The Winning Argument.The Winning Argument Ronald Waicukauski Paul Mark Sandler JoAnne Epps American Bar Association American Bar Association (ABA), voluntary organization of lawyers admitted to the bar of any state. Founded (1878) largely through the efforts of the Connecticut Bar Association, it is devoted to improving the administration of justice, seeking uniformity of law www.abanet.org/abapubs/home.html 210 pp., $85 Many treatises and articles are dedicated to techniques for arguing cases, but few are as succinct suc·cinct adj. suc·cinct·er, suc·cinct·est 1. Characterized by clear, precise expression in few words; concise and terse: a succinct reply; a succinct style. 2. and focused as The Winning Argument. Although it is only 210 pages, the book--written by three attorneys, one of whom is also a law professor--covers all aspects of preparing and delivering effective arguments at trial. The authors clearly articulate the important principles of persuasion so often taught in trial advocacy programs. They explain that presentations must be goal-directed and address the most persuadable decision-makers. They must be based on reason, appeal to emotion Appeal to emotion is a logical fallacy which uses the manipulation of the recipient's emotions, rather than valid logic, to win an argument. This kind of appeal to emotion is a type of red herring and encompasses several logical fallacies, including: Arguments often cover a wide range of legal and factual issues and may include rhetoric that does little to advance a position. Any point made in argument that doesn't help achieve the goal is wasted. More important, the goals of any argument, and the points made, should focus on those who will decide the case. Not all decision-makers can be persuaded, at least not to the same level of commitment. An argument should resonate res·o·nate v. res·o·nat·ed, res·o·nat·ing, res·o·nates v.intr. 1. To exhibit or produce resonance or resonant effects. 2. with their life experiences, beliefs, and values. When the issue is communicated as an important one, it both captures the listener's attention and gives the listener a feeling of importance--the case is in his or her hands. Plaintiff lawyers must directly state the issues to be decided. They must present facts and logical conclusions that jurors will adopt and use during deliberations. Otherwise, aggressive defense jurors and anti-plaintiff biases will cause the argument to founder. In Chapter 4, "Winning Argments Are Founded on Reasons," the authors review the classic forms of Aristotelian rhetoric: inductive inductive 1. eliciting a reaction within an organism. 2. inductive heating a form of radiofrequency hyperthermia that selectively heats muscle, blood and proteinaceous tissue, sparing fat and air-containing tissues. and deductive reasoning Deductive reasoning Using known facts to draw a conclusion about a specific situation. , generalization, analogy, and causal correlation. While most trial attorneys are familiar with these, even experienced attorneys are sometimes surprised by an opponent's argument. The authors--whose backgrounds include defense work--review methods the defense bar uses to identify fallacies This is a list of fallacies. Formal fallacies Formal fallacies are arguments that are fallacious due to an error in their form or technical structure.
In Chapter 6, "Winning Arguments Appeal to Emotions," the authors acknowledge the power of emotion in persuasion, but they fall short of providing the practical guidance many lawyers need. For example, although they note that attorneys should be sensitive to listeners' feelings, the authors give little direction on how to do so. In all fairness, teaching lawyers how to demonstrate emotional intelligence, subtlety, and restraint may be outside the scope of any book: It must be taught and tested in trial advocacy courses. Nonetheless, the points the authors make serve as valuable reminders that emotion drives decisions and verdicts. In Chapter 7, "Winning Arguments Use the Best Medium for the Message," the authors stress that successful arguments incorporate visual aids visual aids Noun, pl objects to be looked at that help the viewer to understand or remember something that emphasize relevant facts so as to make them memorable. Both the evidence and the visuals must be sequenced to begin and end the argument strongly. This does not mean that trial presentations ought to be merely narrated slide shows. Vivid language, rhythm, metaphors, and silence can all help make an argument memorable and persuasive. Some trial attorneys bristle at Verb 1. bristle at - show anger or indignation; "She bristled at his insolent remarks" bridle at, bridle up, bristle up mind - be offended or bothered by; take offense with, be bothered by; "I don't mind your behavior" the idea of designing and rehearsing an argument. Some believe that spontaneity spon·ta·ne·i·ty n. pl. spon·ta·ne·i·ties 1. The quality or condition of being spontaneous. 2. Spontaneous behavior, impulse, or movement. Noun 1. is their most important asset, that they cannot relate on an emotional level if their arguments are rehearsed. Unfortunately for them, most components of effective argument cannot be produced--consistently--off the cuff. Persuasive argument requires deliberate design and diligent practice. Lawyers who want to improve their arguments can use this book to begin that process. Phillip H. Miller practices law in Nashville, Tennessee “Nashville” redirects here. For other uses, see Nashville (disambiguation). Nashville is the capital and the second most populous city of the U.S. state of Tennessee, after Memphis. . |
|
||||||||||||||||||||

Printer friendly
Cite/link
Email
Feedback
Reader Opinion