Printer Friendly
The Free Library
4,547,227 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

The Senate voted to provide federal funding for stem-cell research that involves the destruction of human embryos taken from fertility clinics.


The Senate voted to provide federal funding for stem-cell research that involves the destruction of human embryos taken from fertility clinics. The debate included the usual hyperbole: Senator Lieberman and the editors of the Los Angeles Times claimed that the federal government had a "ban" on such research, and the funding was said to hold the key to curing everything from Alzheimer's disease to juvenile diabetes. The most honest proponents of embryo-destructive stem-cell research, however, are willing to admit two inconvenient truths. The first is that it is exceedingly unlikely that any such research will yield some of the most heavily advertised cures, such as for Alzheimer's. The second is that the embryos that happen to be at fertility clinics are not ideal for their purposes: They need to be able to clone human embryos on which to perform research. As time goes by, our guess is that more and more of them are going to admit a third truth: that it is possible to attain any of these research benefits without destroying human embryos at all. By vetoing this ill-considered legislation, President Bush might buy time for this truth to be generally acknowledged.

COPYRIGHT 2007 National Review, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2007, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:The Week ...
Publication:National Review
Date:May 14, 2007
Words:194
Previous Article:Those Abortion Nuances.(The Week ...)
Next Article:Georgia legislators recently passed a law that would require a woman seeking an abortion to sign a statement indicating whether she had taken the...



Related Articles
Rethink restrictions.(Editorials)(Stem cell research funding needs to be expanded)(Editorial)
Don't veto stem cell bill.(Editorials)(The House measure lifts ban on federal funding)(Editorial)
Creating confusion.(Editorials)(White House tries to derail stem cell legislation)(Editorial)
Siding with science.(Editorials)(Frist comes out in favor of stem cell funding)(Editorial)
Stem sell out.(PUBLIC POLICY)
Stem cell stalemate.(Editorials)(Congress lacks votes to override a Bush veto)(Editorial)
First time for everything.(Editorials)(Bush's first-ever veto will hurt some Republicans)(Editorial)
Stem cell veto only moral thing to do.(Commentary)
For ethical stem-cell research.(PUBLIC POLICY)
Stem cell roadblock.(Editorials)(Bush is likely to veto a bill to expand funding)(Editorial)

Terms of use | Copyright © 2008 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles