Printer Friendly
The Free Library
14,734,913 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

The Purdue page: Research highlights from Purdue University.


Ask Dr. Jon JON Jonah
JON Jesus of Nazareth
JON Job Order Number
JON Johnston Island, US, Outlying Islands (Airport Code) 
 

Dr. Jon Anton
    Anton may refer to: People
    • Anton, a personal name from the same root as Antonius or Anthony
    • Anton, a mythological son of Hercules created by Mark Antony and from whom he claimed descent
    • Anton Chekhov, a Russian writer
     (also known as "Dr. Jon") is the Director of Benchmark Research at Purdue University Purdue University (pərdy`, -d`), main campus at West Lafayette, Ind.  Center for Customer-Driven Quality. Have a Question? E-mail him at DrjonAnton@BenchmarkPortal.com.

    Q: I am looking for Looking for

    In the context of general equities, this describing a buy interest in which a dealer is asked to offer stock, often involving a capital commitment. Antithesis of in touch with.
     what percentage of the time our reps should be in the available status (ready and awaiting a call, but not on one), and what percentage of the time, actively speaking, on an ACD-directed call. Also, what should a realistic goal be?

    Eileen Dyson Dyson may refer to: People
    • Andre Dyson (b. 1979), American Football player
    • Charles W. Dyson (1861 – 1930), a US Navy Rear Admiral
    • Freeman Dyson (b.
     

    A: The two metrics metrics Managed care A popular term for standards by which the quality of a product, service, or outcome of a particular form of Pt management is evaluated. See TQM.  that you are seeking are Percent Available (the percent of time agents are ready and awaiting a call) and the Percent Occupancy (the percent of time agents are actually working on a call (either in a talk, hold, or after call work state). Percent Available plus Percent Occupancy = 100 percent. Agents are either occupied with call-related work or they are waiting for the next call.

    A realistic target for Percent Occupancy is directly related to two factors, team size and your service level goals. In order to meet a set service goal, you must build a certain amount of Available time into your scheduling process. The larger your team size, the smaller the Percent Available needs to be to reach a given service level goal.

    In most call centers, a reasonable goal for Percent Occupancy will fall between 85 and 95 percent. If your agents are available more than 15 percent of the time, boredom Boredom
    See also Futility.

    Aldegonde, Lord St.

    bored nobleman, empty of pursuits. [Br. Lit.: Lothair]

    Baudelaire, Charles

    (1821–1867) French poet whose dissipated lifestyle led to inner despair. [Fr. Lit.
     will quickly set in and you will see handle times rise and customer satisfaction fall. If your agents are available less than 5 percent of the time, agents will be reaching burnout Burnout

    Depletion of a tax shelter's benefits. In the context of mortgage backed securities it refers to the percentage of the pool that has prepaid their mortgage.
    , as they will have extended periods with no chance to rest. Again, handle times tend to rise and customer satisfaction tends to fall, The average occupancy across the thousands of participants in the Purdue benchmarking
    For the geolocating game, see benchmarking (geolocating). For other uses of the term 'benchmark' see benchmark.


    Benchmarking (also "best practice benchmarking" or "process benchmarking") is a process used in management and particularly strategic
     data base is 76.78 percent. There is clearly room for improvement.
    What is your average actual e-mail response time?
    
    Description of Answer
    
                       Respondents
    
    2 to 6 hours
    Less than 2 hours    23.20%
    22 to 26 hours       12.58%
    6 to 10 hours        12.45%
    10 to 14 hours        8.30%
    26 to 30 hours        6.72%
    14 to 18 hours        4.40%
    18 to 22 hours        4.40%
    
    Note: Table made from bar graph.
    How do you measure quality?
    
    Description of Answer
    
                                   Respondents
    
    By sampling                      51.96%
    Error rate per associate         14.71%
    Other                            13.72%
    We do not measure quality        12.75%
    Error rate per 1000 responses     3.92%
    for center
    Number of e-mails required to     2.94%
    solve one customer request
    
    Note: Table made from bar graph.
    


    We have noticed an ever-increasing interest by contact center managers in best practices related to e-mail management. For that reason, we have launched major initiatives in e-mail benchmarking. The above two graphs demonstrate some interesting results. Notice that the majority of e-mail is responded to in less than 6 hours. This is in spite of in opposition to all efforts of; in defiance or contempt of; notwithstanding.

    See also: Spite
     the fact that when we survey consumers, they are quite happy to have their e-mail answered in 24 hours, or even more. Regarding e-mail quality, the majority of managers seem to sample the e-mail that was sent and perform their quality check there. We would encourage a greater focus on ensuring that each e-mail is answered in one email, i.e., first time final, as we all strive to do in our telephone calls.

    The Purdue benchmark research has been conducted since 1995. Purdue currently holds data for more than 5,400 call centers. To learn about how to participate in some of Purdue University's new benchmark research, please visit www.BenchmarkPortal.com.

    For information and subscriptions, visit www.TMCnet.com or call 203-852.6800.
    COPYRIGHT 2002 Technology Marketing Corporation
    No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
    Copyright 2002, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

     Reader Opinion

    Title:

    Comment:



     

    Article Details
    Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
    Publication:Customer Interaction Solutions
    Geographic Code:1USA
    Date:Apr 1, 2002
    Words:618
    Previous Article:TMC[TM] labs review. (TMC Labs).(PrairieFyre Contact Center Suite 3.0)(Evaluation)
    Next Article:Small Town strategy. (RE: Locations).
    Topics:



    Related Articles
    CHAMP ON THE MOVE.(Brief Article)
    Ask Dr. Jon. (The Purdue Page).(customer service conctact using Web sites)
    Wood veneer seminar set for March 6-7, 2003. (Trends & News).(Brief Article)
    Research highlights from Prudue University. (The Prudue Page).(call centers)(Brief Article)
    The Purdue page.
    Ask Dr. Jon.(The Purdue Page)
    Colorado State University.(Appointments And Promotions)
    Veneer seminar offers display opportunities.(Trends & News)(Brief Article)
    Flies in the Face of Fashion, Mites Make Right, and Other Bugdacious Tales.

    Terms of use | Copyright © 2009 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles