The ITC Has Again Made a Final Determination Concluding That Macronix Products Do Not Infringe Atmel's Patent.Business Editors & Legal Writers FREMONT, Calif.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--June 5, 2001 Macronix International Co. Ltd. and Macronix America Inc. (collectively "Macronix") announced that the United States United States, officially United States of America, republic (2005 est. pop. 295,734,000), 3,539,227 sq mi (9,166,598 sq km), North America. The United States is the world's third largest country in population and the fourth largest country in area. International Trade Commission (ITC ITC (Brit) n abbr (= Independent Television Commission) → Fernseh-Aufsichtsgremium ITC n abbr (BRIT) (= Independent Television Commission) → ) issued on June 1, 2001, a final determination in Investigation No. 337-TA-395 in favor of Macronix, finding that (a) Macronix's products do not infringe in·fringe v. in·fringed, in·fring·ing, in·fring·es v.tr. 1. To transgress or exceed the limits of; violate: infringe a contract; infringe a patent. 2. Atmel's letter patent 4,451,903 ("the '903 patent") and (b) Macronix did not violate Section 337 of the Tariff Act. The ITC further ordered that the investigation proceeding against Macronix be terminated and that its ruling be published in the United States' Federal Register. Macronix welcomes the ITC's ruling, which once again confirms the fact that Macronix's products do not infringe, as Macronix has consistently demonstrated during this four-year investigation. The ITC instituted an investigation based upon the complaint filed by Atmel Corp. in March 1997. During the investigation, Macronix has always cooperated in good faith with the ITC in all respects, confident that a full investigation would show that Macronix has not violated vi·o·late tr.v. vi·o·lat·ed, vi·o·lat·ing, vi·o·lates 1. To break or disregard (a law or promise, for example). 2. To assault (a person) sexually. 3. Atmel's patents. The ITC had issued an initial determination in July 1998 ruling that Macronix did not infringe the '903 patent based on all of the evidence and extensive fact-finding. At each stage of the proceedings during the past four-year investigation, the independent ITC authorities who reviewed the substance of the infringement claims lodged by Atmel concluded that Macronix did not infringe. In the ITC's October 2000 final determination issued in its reconsideration proceeding, which issued an exclusion order against the other parties, the ITC still concluded that Macronix was the sole respondent that did not infringe the '903 patent and that Macronix was permitted to continue to import products into the United States. Atmel appealed the ITC finding of Macronix's noninfringement to the Federal Circuit, which issued a decision on Jan. 30, 2001, remanding the case to the ITC for further determination of whether Macronix's products infringed the '903 patent in light of the new patent claim construction announced by the Federal Circuit. The ITC has now ruled once again that Macronix's products do not infringe the '903 patent and that Macronix did not violate Section 337 of the Tariff Act or any other laws. Hence, the sales of Macronix's products, including EPROM EPROM in full erasable programmable read-only memory Form of computer memory that does not lose its content when the power supply is cut off and that can be erased and reused. and Flash, in the United States are lawful Licit; legally warranted or authorized. The terms lawful and legal differ in that the former contemplates the substance of law, whereas the latter alludes to the form of law. A lawful act is authorized, sanctioned, or not forbidden by law. and permissible per·mis·si·ble adj. Permitted; allowable: permissible tax deductions; permissible behavior in school. per·mis . Macronix is one of the leading manufacturers of nonvolatile memories See non-volatile memory. in the industry. Macronix devotes about 10 percent of its revenue to the research and development of more advanced products. Macronix also makes great effort to enforce its intellectual-property rights in order to protect its high-value products and maintain its business advantage. |
|
||||||||||||||||

Printer friendly
Cite/link
Email
Feedback
Reader Opinion