Members of some sects claiming to be today the descendants of Elohim, it is worth to know what they mean by Elohim.The Elohim
Members of some sects claiming to be today the descendants of Elohim, it is worth to know what they mean by Elohim.
According to them, elohim are divine creatures originating from other planets or galaxies and who have come on earth, in ancient times, with their high intelligence, so that to bring up men to civilisation by building up, for example, the ziggurats in Mesopotamia, or the pyramids in Egypt or elselwere, and by teaching them language, mathematics, astronomy, and finally all the sciences known by men of that time, as it is proved by the numerous documents exhumed so far by archaeologists in Egypt, Mesopotamia, the land of Nascas, the land of Mayas, of Aztecs, of Incas etc. etc.
In brief, all we know and admire of ancient civilisations comes from the Elohim, themselves being divine creatures coming from others parts of the cosmos than the earth planet.
As for members of the sects who pretend originate from them, because themselves are, according to them, of the same race, they are now living on earth to continue the work of their ancestors, namely by cloning (or trying to do it) men so that to create a new manking, this one being suppposed to be similar to that embodied by the divine creatures named Elohim.
Having said that, the word elohim belongs to an old sabean religion in which the elohim are themselves constellations instead of human creatures with flesh and bones.
Whatever are the name of extraterrestrials (elohim, nephilim, angels, annunaki, eons with ethereal body, etc), all of them, because being stars or constellations having come down, from the heights of the celestial hemisphere into its southern counterpart (we simplify, here, our reasoning, in order to be more clear), appear, to men living on earth and who are observing the sky during nighttime, as men of divine essence having setlle down on earth from the cosmos.
Indeed, by looking att the sky during the night, we may observe that the ground of the celestial planisphere locates, in terms of altitude, as low as the earth planet itself.
And because some of the constellations who regularily come «on earth », from the heights of the celestial planisphere, have a human shape, they look like men when the latter are extraterrestrials coming on earth from the cosmos with their OVNI or the soucoups.
As for those who observed the sky and the movements of planets and constellations during the nighttime, and who will make of their religion a sabean one, they were, in antiquity, nomads journeying during the night, with family and herd, because of the hot temperature of the daytime.
And because themselves, nomads travellers, were observing the travelling stars during the night, they will, by the time, identified themselves with stars and constellations moving in the sky.
As for the nation or the community they formed altogether on earth, instead of remaining permanently in a home land which did not exist at tha time insofar their members were nomads, it was relying on the god who, in the sky, symbolized alliance between the nomads living on earth and the rest of universe.
And here is the trick : the god of this nation was, at a specific time in history of men, a planet or a constellation.
And if we may prove, by studying the comparative mythology, that this god was the Leo Major, in the sabean religion, at some stage of its devolopment, this Leo will be replaced by the Centaur, in the role of king of gods, gods who are here constellations moving on the celestial planisphere.
Anyway, insofar nomads of that time identified themselves with stars or constlellations, the latter, by coming down very low, on the celestial planisphere, from a starting position remaining in the very heights of the latter, look like extraterrestrials when these arrive on earth from another planet or galaxy.
In other world, the same stars which come down on earth during their moving on or around the celestial planisphere (before returning to its top), hese stars are the elohim or the nephilim mentioned in the Bible.
As for the god himself whose name is Elohim, He is the chief of the celestial army (a chief whose name is Yahveh as well in the yahwist version of the Old Testament of the Bible).
As for men with flesh and bones who are adoring Yahweh at that time, they are nomads, as we have said above, nomads moving, with family and herd, inside a territory which spread, at that time, from Egypt to Arabia by passing by the desert of Sinai and Palestine of that time.
Having said that, when today or during of the antiquity time, some scholars make of Abraham an astrologer, that Abraham, instead of being a man with flesh and bones, is a constellation named Centaur, a Centaur who was considered as a magician as well as an astrologer by worshippers of the old sabean religion.
And because the astrologer named Abraham lives momentarily in Egypt, he teaches, he, Centaur, astrology to a Pharaoh who is nothing else (or nobody else), in the old sabean religion, than the Hydra constellation.
And Pharaoh is learning rudiments of astrology when other constellations belonging to the divine army (an army whose celestial guide is Yahveh, or Elohim, or Shaddaï), join the Hydra into the southern part of the celestial planisphere (itself, Hydra, leaving that country after having been tought astrology by a Centaur whose name is here Abraham).
And when the constellation named Centaur, instead of being representated by Abraham, is representated by the Christ of the New Testament, nstead of teaching astrology to a Pharaoh embodiyng the Hydra, it (or he) celebrates the Cena with his disciples before being crucified.
And because the mythical Jesus appears, in apocryphal texts, like an eon, those who are responsible for the christian dogma, inside the New Cathololic Church, will expel these texts out of the Canon and retain, in it, only the texts named today Gospels and some others, all of them making of Jesus a man with flesh and bones whose divine nature has enabled him to ressuscite from the dead after himself has been crucified by the Romans or by the Jews.
In other words, the responsible for the dogma, inside the new roman and catholic Church, is now condemning, as heretics, those who, under the name of Gnostics, have identified Jesus Christ with a celestial eon which body is made of ether, and those who, under the name of Arianists, have seen in Jesus a man with flesh and bones who have become divine after his crucifixon (assuming he became divine in that circumstance).
In brief, responsible of the new religion are now accusing worshippers of the old ones to adore many gods instead of adore the Unique God, a God who, by appearing respectively to Abraham, Jacob, Moses, and many others, has made of their religion a revealed one, and of themselves creatures tied for the rest of their life to this personal god who has appeared to them at a very moment of their life.
In brief, if apocryphal texts are not being part of the Canon of the Church, the reason is that their content is not pure enough (in the sense they do not glorify the God Father and His unique Son, as well as they do not make of Mary the mother of Jesus by the Holy Spirit, a Jesus perceived by Christians as the unique Son both of God and the Virgin Mary.
Instead of it, these texts focuse on the relation of Jesus with Mary Magdalene on one side, and with his own brothers on the other side.
And because theologians of the new religion will erase all traces of the old sabean religion, Jesus, instead of being, under the name of Christ, a eon belonging to the superior part of the cosmos (or, in other words, a divine figure who, insofar his body looks like ether, lives only as a spirit), has become, in mind of Christians, a man with divine power.
And since we evoke eons, we may note that the latter were planets and constelllations in the old sabean religion. And because that religion was relying on mysteres, only initiated people knew its real content.
As for the authors of sacred texts, they had hidden (to non initiated people) that very aspect of their religion by using an esoteric language which eveals its astral dimension only through onomastic (or that is the same, through the study of the names of the actors taking part to stories told in these texts).
In the case of Jesus, the eon embodied by him (and which belongs here to the sabean religion) refers to the Centaur constellation.
But because the Catholic Church will eradicate the old sabean religion, in the new religion, Jesus, instead of being the Centaur constellation, is (or has become, historically speaking), in mind of Christians, a man with flesh and bones whose figure is immediately divine.
In other words, that Jesus, insteaf of being, either a constellation, or a simple man, or a man having become divine after his death on earth, is, in mind of Christians, a divine creature since the very beginning, that is to say, since he has come down on earth from the sky so that to save men by being himself crucified, a Jesus who leaves then the earth to rejoin His Father in the eternal heavens.
Let us precise that such perception of theology does not exist until the time of emperor Constantine.
Before that time, indeed, christians theologians consider, with Paul, that the divine Jesus (a Jesus whose name is now Christ) exists only since the time of his resurrection.
In this respect, we may consider that the theology of Paul remains more on side of the Gnostics than on side of the Canon of the Roman Catholic Church.
As for Constantine, when making of christianity the first state religion of the roman empire, he has taken account of the cult of Mithra, the latter being, at that time, the first and main concurrent of the christian religion inside the roman empire.
And if mithracism was indeed a religion with mysteries, the new christian religion will, as for it, eliminate, of its canon, all traces of esoterism, with the result that the image of an ethereal Christ has now disappeared from the scene, itself beeing replaced by an iconograyphy showing Jesus as a man with flesh and bones.
But if the man named Jesus-Christ exists, indeed, on iconography, and is therefore perceived like that by his worshippers, the real Jesus (i.e. the one having been living as a man in old Palestine), nobody knows him, today, for having not been living at his time. As for people who lived, in Palestina, at his time, we have no witnesses from them, except the ones originating from the apostles themselves of Jesus.
To return to the sabean religion, we have seen, above, that the god with man profile is, in that religion, the Centaur, a Centaur who was the first man, under the name, respectively of Manu, in the vedic religion, of Manes, in the old egyptian religion, and of Adam, in the Old Testament of the Bible.
And whereas the Bootes is, in that religion, the Man from Upside, the Centaur is the man from Downside.
Having said that, we may also see in the Centaur both the Man from Upside and Downside.
Such a duality has explained by the fact that the constellation, instead of remaining in the south part of the celestial planisphere, travels on and around the planisphere during its yearly trip.
And here is the trick : when the Centaur leaves the heights of the celestial planisphere to come down to a place of the planisphere which, by remaining in the very south, confonds itself with the earth, he has the same attitude as the Christ when the latter comes on earth to save men, or, on the contrary, to punish these men for having listened to Satan or when they have condemned himself, Jesus, to a death penalty when gathering in front of the Sanhedrin.
But here again, when these men listen to Satan, they embody, in the old sabean religion, constellations wich are now remaining next to the Dragon, or next the Hydra, or next to the clouds of the Milky Way, when remaining behind the northern border of the celestial planisphere.
And the same remark is available as far as the Ante Christ is concerned.
Indeed, in the sabean version of Apocalypse, this one embodies the Hydra constellation.
The Hydra is the Ante Christ for the same reason that the Christ is a Centaure which (or whose) destiny is to follow the Hydra on the celestial planisphere.
[We may note, at that point, that the Morning Star embodied by Quetzalcoatl (we are here in the atzec mythology), was more likely the Rigel star of the Centaur than the Rigel star of Orion (or, other variant, than the planet Venus ? although we may conclude, with scholars, that Quetzalcoatl himself had ? by a process named transubstantiation- become the Venus planet after having lived on earth as a man, and after having died there]
As for the Apocalypse itself, such an event consists, in the sabean religion, in the return of the Centaur on earth, himself having disappeared, when named Quetzalcoatl, in a place of the celestial planisphere locating both oversee and in the east.
And because the earth (which embodies, in the astral religion, the southern part of the celestial planisphere) is now occupied by the Hydra and its fellowship Sextant, Crater and Corvus, the return of the Centaur to that place, and the concomitant departure of the Hydra and its fellowship from the latter, is synonymous of purification.
And because men and women are here constellations, the latter are, one more time, visible in the southern part of the celestial planisphere.
In short, the same constellations which looked like pure eons when invisible on the celestial planisphere, have recovered their body by making themselves visible into its visible counterpart.
Above, we have said that there are no direct witnesses, about the existence of a divine man named Jesus having been living in old Palestine at the time of Augustus or Tiberius, except those collocated in the Bible itself. And we have seen that the latter originate first from the Apostles themselves of Jesus.
Now, what is to be emphasized on, is the fact that these Apostles were, in the old sabean religion, constellations as well.
And because Jesus himself is, there, the Centaur, his followers are constellations wich follow the Centaur during their respective moving on the planisphere.
So, when christian theologians, talking about the Gospels, say that they have been written, either by the Apostles themselves, or by people who knew them personaly, or finally by people (who are here scholars) who have collocated, in the Gospels, all the witnesses regarding the live of Jesus and his apostles, insofar themselves, apostles, are, in the sabean religion, constellations, the scholars having written down the live of Jesus, were adoring, at that time, a sabean religion.
But the crucial point is elsewhere. Indeed, when we learn what the life of Jesus consists in, through the witnesses of his Apostles, since the latter are constellations, and since Jesus in now on an earth represented now by Palestine, it means that the Centaur embodied by him remains now in the southern part of the celestial planisphere, and it means, as well, as that the apostles embody constellations which remain at the same time in the visible part of the celestial planisphere.
Having said that, the Fathers of the Church, as we have pointed it out above, had, about religion in general and Jesus in particular, a totally different position.
Indeed, they have considered that Jesus is both a divine man and the second member of a Trinity composed respectively of God Father, of His Unique Son and of the Holy Spirit.
And because of it, they will condemn, as heretic, all references to docetism, arianism, sabeism, etc, which were at that time part of religion.
Let us precise that we are at a period, in history of religion, during which the partisans of the new religion (which relies here monotheism - itself, monotheism, presupposing, in the case of Christianity, that the Divinity is represented by a Trinity in which Jesus Christ occupies, as the Unique Son of God Father, the second place), are fighting against the partisans of an old religion relying on polytheism, and beyond that, on the fact that gods and men were, in the sabean variant of that old religion, planets and constellations.
Having said that, the positive contribution of Christianity remains in the fact that Jesus Christ, who is the piliar of that religion, is symbolizing love, piece and misericorde on earth, all things belonging to a God Father remaining anywhere in the sky and who has sent His Unique Son on earth to save men.
And here is the main difference between the god of the Christians (a god name Christos) and Mithra : if the god Christos has indeed affinities with Mithra, himself, Christ, expresses love and charity instead of symbolizing the conquered sun.
Similar remark is available by comparing the christianity with the Judaism. If Christianity is undoubfully the elder son of Judaism (in the same way that France was the elder daughter of the Church at the collapsing of the Roman empire), the god of Christians symbolizes love, as well charity and mercy, all over the world, compared with a Yahveh who is, according to the Old Testament, focusing on his own proteges. And if He was giving attention to other peoples, it was to chasty them or to show them (when, for exemple, it is about Pharaon and Egyptians ) His great power.
Having said that, when Jesus, to return to him and to Christianity which himself is the Logos or the Verb of, when Jesus is crucified to save men, he embodies, in the old sabean religion, a Centaur who, remaining invisible on the celestial planisphere, has not yet saved men (who are here creatures with flesh and bones living on earth).
These men need to been saved for a very reason : they remain, at that very moment, under the influence of the Hydra constellation (itself being embodied by the Serpent of Creation in the adventures of Adam and Eve), or, other scenario, under that of the Dragon.
To summarize our discussion, when members of some sects of our times talk about the elohim, the latter are constellations moving on the celestial planisphere.
And because some of these constellations come down very low, on the planisphere, it is as if themselves were visiting, under the name of Elohim (or Eons, or Annunaki, or Nephtilim, or anything else), the earth and its inhabitants, at that very moment.
We hope that that brief plunge into the origins of Christianity was not superfluous for those who believe that the elohim are their ancestors, and for the doctors of a christian religion who, nowadays, know little about the sabean religion which was prevailing everywhere at a specific period of antiquity, before being supplanted by Christianity (a christianity relying here, as far as theology is concerned, on the code defined by the Fathers of the Church).
So long ladies and gentlemen!
For further information, consult