The Chernobyl nuclear catastrophe: unacknowledged health detriment.Baverstock and Williams (2006) rightly recommended international long-term studies of all potential health effects among the populations exposed to Chernobyl fallout. In the meanwhile, data on post-Chernobyl health detriment in the former Soviet Union and exposed parts of Europe, including evidence of association with such contamination, are already accessible, mostly electronically. Three mutually consistent findings, in particular, challenge widely publicized conclusions the World Health Organization (WHO 2005a, 2005b) (after approval by the International Atomic Energy Agency International Atomic Energy Agency: see Atomic Energy Agency, International. International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) International organization officially founded in 1957 to promote the peaceful use of nuclear energy. ), and the United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (UNSCEAR UNSCEAR United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiations 2000). First, scientists from the Moscow Kurchatov Institute The Kurchatov Institute (Russian: Роcсийский научный центр presented physical evidence that the dominant sources of energy released by the exploding reactor were not the officially assumed thermal explosions (Fairlie and Sumner 2006) but rather very low-yield nuclear chain reactions in heavy elements, combined with chemical reactions (Checherov 2006). Thus, contrary to the assumed emission of 50 million Ci into the atmosphere (i.e., an estimated 3.5% of the radioactive inventory of the destroyed fuel elements, leaving over 90% of it in the "sarcophagus sarcophagus (särkŏf`əgəs) [Gr.,=flesh-eater], name given by the Greeks to a special marble found in Asia Minor, near the territory of ancient Troy, and used in caskets. "), these scientists conclude a 26-fold larger release of radioactivity, leaving no more than 10-15% of the inventory behind. A 26-fold increase would mean that population exposures from the worldwide fallout was in fact more than an order of magnitude A change in quantity or volume as measured by the decimal point. For example, from tens to hundreds is one order of magnitude. Tens to thousands is two orders of magnitude; tens to millions is three orders of magnitude, etc. larger than assumed by UNSCEAR (2000). This would explain a variety of observed health effects that are not to be expected at currently assumed doses (Committee Examining Radiation Risks of Internal Emitters 2004; Fairlie and Sumner 2006; Glushenko et al. 2006). Second, the WHO accepted the conclusions by UNSCEAR that exposures of populations in the neighboring contaminated contaminated, v 1. made radioactive by the addition of small quantities of radioactive material. 2. made contaminated by adding infective or radiographic materials. 3. an infective surface or object. regions were of the order of 10 mSv, except for higher thyroid doses from [.sup.131.I] (UNSCEAR 2000; WHO 2005a, 2005b). The main contributions to dose in other tissues--externally and internally--have been assumed to come from [.sup.137.Cs] and [.sup.134.Cs], whereas exposures from other radioisotopes, such as [.sup.90.Sr] and [.sup.239.Pu], or other alpha emitters were presumed negligible beyond distances of about 100 km from the plant (Fairlie and Sumner 2006; UNSCEAR 2000; WHO 2005a, 2005b). However, direct biological dosimetry dosimetry /do·sim·e·try/ (do-sim´e-tre) scientific determination of amount, rate, and distribution of radiation emitted from a source of ionizing radiation, in biological d. contradicts these official estimates. Several research teams investigated radiation-specific cytogenic alterations in the lymphocytes Lymphocytes Small white blood cells that bear the major responsibility for carrying out the activities of the immune system; they number about 1 trillion. of about 1,000 exposed persons immediately after the accident and/or some years later (Schmitz-Feuerhake 2006; Schmitz-Feuerhake et al. 2006). The majority of these studies revealed that the rate of unstable and stable chromosome aberrations was about 10-100 times higher than would be expected at UNSCEAR's estimated exposure levels (UNSCEAR 2000). Biological dosimetry is, however, consistent with the evidence for a much larger release of radioactivity in the explosion. Furthermore, multiaberrant cells, characteristic for incorporated alpha emitters, were identified well beyond 100 km from Chernobyl, whereas plutonium particles were found as far away as Norway, contradicting "negligible exposure levels" beyond 100 km [International Physicians for the Prevention of Nuclear War International Physicians for the Prevention of Nuclear War (IPPNW) is a worldwide grouping of 60 national medical organizations. IPPNW uses research, education and advocacy to help prevent nuclear war and encourage the abolition of all nuclear weapons. (IPPNW IPPNW International Physicians for the Prevention of Nuclear War ) 2006; Schmitz-Feuerhake 2006; Schmitz-Feuerhake et al. 2006]. Currently adopted models for Chernobyl dose estimates ignore contributions from alpha emissions even though they are known to have relative biological effectiveness relative biological effectiveness n. A measure of the capacity of a specific ionizing radiation to produce a specific biological effect, expressed relative to a reference radiation, such as radium gamma rays or 200-volt x-rays. (RBE RBE relative biological effectiveness. RBE, n See radiation, biologic effectiveness of, relative. RBE ) about 20 times larger than that of most radioactive beta and gamma radiation (Fairlie and Sumner 2006; International Commission on Radiological Protection The International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) is an advisory body providing recommendations and guidance on radiation protection; It was founded in 1928 by the International Society of Radiology (ISR) and was then called the ‘International X-ray and Radium 1991; UNSCEAR 2000). Third, excess infant (perinatal) mortality and teratogenic effects were observed in Germany, Poland, and the former Soviet Union shortly after the Chernobyl explosion [European Committee on Radiation Risk The European Committee on Radiation Risk (ECRR) is a committee set up in 1997 by the European Green Party, (including Green Party MEPs) to discuss the contents of the European Directive 96/29/EURATOM which sets out the basic standards regarding radiation protection in the European (ECRR ECRR European Committee on Radiation Risk ECRR European Centre for River Restoration ECRR Edinburgh Centre for Rural Research ECRR Eastern Coal Regional Roundtable ECRR Education Counseling and Risk Reduction ECRR European Congress on Research in Rehabilitation ) 2006; Gesellschaft fur Strahlenschutz/ECRR 2006; Korblein 1997, 2003; Scherb et al. 1999; Schmitz-Feuerhake 2006]. Excess malformations, childhood morbidity, and genetic effects were reported from several areas of Central Europe and Turkey (Committee Examining Radiation Risks of Internal Emitters 2004; ECRR 2006; Fairlie and Sumner 2006; Korblein 2006; Scherb 2006; Schmitz-Feuerhake 2006). These post-Chernobyl observations are consistent with those in the United Kingdom, the United States, and West Germany following the atmospheric nuclear bomb tests of the 1950s (Korblein 2004; Whyte 1992). According to the International Commission on Radiological Protection (1991), UNSCEAR (2000), and other radiation authorities, teratogenic effects should not occur below a dose threshold of about 100 mSv. However, official estimates of fetal doses after the Chernobyl explosion, even in the most contaminated regions of Germany, were < 1 mSv (UNSCEAR 2000), far below the presumed safe threshold. Thus, either the fetus is much more sensitive to radiation than officially assumed, or the estimated post-Chernobyl fetal doses are far too low (which is consistent with considerably higher radioactive releases), or, most likely, there is a combination of both. In the absence of scientifically convincing evidence rebutting such challenges to official assessments of the physical events and long-term human consequences of the Chernobyl catastrophe, the Precautionary Principle in public health issues (Goldstein 1999; Kriebel et al. 2001) requires that these unwelcome findings be no longer ignored in "state of knowledge" reviews (Brenner et al. 2003; National Research Council 2006), in "assessments of the health consequences" (Baverstock and Williams 2006), and in official radiation protection standards. The author declares he has no competing financial interests. Rudi H. Nussbaum Department of Physics and Environmental Sciences Portland State University Portland, Oregon E-mail: D4RN@odin.pdx.edu REFERENCES Baverstock K, Williams D. 2006. The Chernobyl accident 20 years on: an assessment of the health consequences and the international response. Environ Health Perspect 114:1312-1317. Brenner DJ, Doll R, Goodhead DT, Hall EJ, Land CE, Little JB, et al. 2003. Cancer risks attributable to low doses of ionizing radiation i·on·i·zing radiation n. High-energy radiation capable of producing ionization in substances through which it passes. Ionizing radiation : assessing what we really know. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100(24):13761-13766; doi: 10.1073/pnas.2235592100 [Online 10 November 2003]. Checherov KP. 2006. On the physical nature and parameters of the explosion (energy release of physical and chemical reactions in the accident processes development) in block 4 of the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant [Abstract]. In: International Congress: Chernobyl-20 Years Later. Berlin:Gesellschaft fur Strahlenschutz/European Committee on Radiation Risks, 18.0-18.3. Available: http://www.strahlentelex.de/20_Jahre%20_nach_Tschernobyl_Abstracts_GSS (storage) GSS - Group-Sweeping Scheduling. _Berlin-Charite_2006.pdf [accessed 20 September 2006]. Committee Examining Radiation Risks of Internal Emitters. 2004. Committee Examining Radiation Risks of Internal Emitters (CERRIE CERRIE Committee Examining Radiation Risks of Internal Emitters ) Homepage. Available: http://www.cerrie.org [accessed 20 September 2006]. ECRR (European Committee on Radiation Risk). 2006. Chernobyl 20 Years On; The Health Effects of the Chernobyl Accident. Aberystwyth, UK:Green Audit Press. Available: http://www.euradcom.org/publications/chernobylebook.pdf [accessed 20 September 2006]. Fairlie I, Sumner D. 2006. The Other Report on Chernobyl (TORCH). Berlin, Brussels, Kiev:Greens/EFA in the European Parliament. Available: http://www.chernobylreport.org/torch.pdf [accessed 6 April 2007]. Gesellschaft fur Strahlenschutz/ECRR (European Committee on Radiation Risks). 2006. International Congress: Chernobyl-20 Years Later, Berlin, Germany, 3-5 April 2006. Available: http://www.strahlentelex.de/20_Jahre%20_nach_Tschernobyl_Abstracts_GSS_Berlin-Charite_2006.pdf [accessed 20 September 2006]. Glushenko AI, Suskov II, Baleva LS, Sipyagina AE, Checherov KP. 2006. The radiation-ecological and medicalgenetic consequences of the Chernobyl disaster after 20 years and the prognosis for the future [Abstract]. In: International Congress: Chernobyl-20 Years Later. Berlin:Gesellschaft fur Strahlenschutz/European Committee on Radiation Risks, 23-24. Available: http://www.strahlentelex.de/20_Jahre%20_nach_Tschernobyl_Abstracts_GSS_Berlin-Charite_2006.pdf [accessed 20 September 2006]. Goldstein BD. 1999. The precautionary principle and scientific research are not antithetical an·ti·thet·i·cal also an·ti·thet·ic adj. 1. Of, relating to, or marked by antithesis. 2. Being in diametrical opposition. See Synonyms at opposite. [Editorial]. Environ Health Perspect 107:A594-A595. International Commission on Radiological Protection. 1991. 1990 Recommendations of the ICRP ICRP International Commission on Radiological Protection ICRP International Commission on Radiation Protection (Stockholm, Sweden) ICRP Indonesian Committee on Religion and Peace ICRP Intensive Cognitive Rehabilitation Program . Ann ICRP 21(1-3):1-201. IPPNW. 2006. The Health Effects of Chernobyl. Meta analysis. Berlin:International Physicians for the Prevention of Nuclear War and Gesellschaft fur Strahlenschutz. Available: http://www.ippnw-europe.org/ [accessed September 2006]. Korblein A. 1997. Perinatal mortality in Germany following the Chernobyl accident. Radiat Environ Biophys 36:3-7. Korblein A. 2003. Strontium strontium (strŏn`shēəm) [from Strontian, a Scottish town], a metallic chemical element; symbol Sr; at. no. 38; at. wt. 87.62; m.p. 769°C;; b.p. 1,384°C;; sp. gr. 2.6 at 20°C;; valence +2. fallout from Chernobyl and perinatal mortality in Ukraine and Belarus. Radiats Biol Radioecol 43(2):197-202. Korblein A. 2004. Perinatal mortality in West Germany following atmospheric nuclear tests. Arch Environ Health 59(11):604-609. Korblein A. 2006. Infant mortality (hardware) infant mortality - It is common lore among hackers (and in the electronics industry at large) that the chances of sudden hardware failure drop off exponentially with a machine's time since first use (that is, until the relatively distant time at which enough mechanical after Chernobyl [Abstract]. In: International Congress: Chernobyl-20 Years Later. Berlin:Gesellschaft fur Strahlenschutz/European Committee on Radiation Risks, 35. Available: http://www.strahlentelex.de/20_Jahre%20_nach_Tschernobyl_Abstracts_GSS_Berlin-Charite_2006.pdf [accessed 20 September 2006]. Kriebel D, Tickner J, Epstein P, Lemons J, Levins R, Loechler EL, et al. 2001. The precautionary principle in environmental science. Environ Health Perspect 109:871-876. National Research Council. 2006. Health Risks from Exposure to Low Levels of Ionizing Radiation: BEIR BEIR Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiations VII Phase 2. Washington, DC:National Academy Press. Available: http://www.nap.edu/books/030909156X/html [accessed 20 September 2006]. Scherb H. 2006. Statistical analysis of genetic effects after the Chernobyl disaster [Abstract]. In: International Congress: Chernobyl-20 Years Later. Berlin:Gesellschaft fur Strahlenschutz/European Committee on Radiation Risks, 37-39. Available: http://www.strahlentelex.de/20_Jahre%20_nach_Tschernobyl_Abstracts_GSS_Berlin-Charite_2006.pdf [accessed 20 September 2006]. Scherb H, Weigelt E, Bruske-Hohlfield I. 1999. European stillbirth Stillbirth Definition A stillbirth is defined as the death of a fetus at any time after the twentieth week of pregnancy. Stillbirth is also referred to as intrauterine fetal death (IUFD). proportions before and after the Chernobyl accident. Int J Epidemiol 28:932-940. Schmitz-Feuerhake I. 2006. Radiation-induced effects in humans after in utero in utero (in u´ter-o) [L.] within the uterus. in u·ter·o adj. In the uterus. in utero adv. exposure: conclusions from findings after the Chernobyl accident. In: Chernobyl 20 Years On; The Health Effects of the Chernobyl Accident. Aberystwyth, UK:Green Audit Press, 105-116. Available: http://www.euradcom.org/publications/chernobylebook.pdf [accessed 6 April 2006]. Schmitz-Feuerhake I, Hoffmann W, Pflugbeil S. 2006. How reliable are the dose estimates for populations contaminated by Chernobyl fallout? A comparison of results by physical reconstruction and biological dosimetry [Abstract]. In: International Congress: Chernobyl-20 Years Later. Berlin:Gesellschaft fur Strahlenschutz/European Committee on Radiation Risks, 21. Available: http://www.strahlentelex.de/20_Jahre%20_nach_Tschernobyl_Abstracts_GSS_Berlin-Charite_2006.pdf [accessed 20 September 2006]. UNSCEAR. 2000. Annex J: Exposures and effects of the Chernobyl accident. In: Sources and Effects of Ionising Radiation; United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation. UNSCEAR 2000 Report to the General Assembly with Scientific Annexes. Volume II: Effects. New York New York, state, United States New York, Middle Atlantic state of the United States. It is bordered by Vermont, Massachusetts, Connecticut, and the Atlantic Ocean (E), New Jersey and Pennsylvania (S), Lakes Erie and Ontario and the Canadian province of :United Nations: 451-566. Available: http://www.unscear.org/docs/reports/annexj.pdf [accessed 6 April 2007]. WHO. 2005a. Health Effects of the Chernobyl Accident and Special Health Care Programmes. Available: http://www.who.int/entity/ionizing_radiation/a_e/chernobyl/-EGH%20Master%20file%202005.08.24.pdf [accessed 20 September 2006] WHO. 2005b. Chernobyl: The True Scale of the Accident: 20 Years Later a UN Report Provides Definitive Answers and Ways to Repair Lives. Available: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/news/releases/2005/pr38/en/index.html [accessed 6 April 2007]. Whyte RK. 1992. First day neonatal mortality since 1935: reexamination re·ex·am·ine also re-ex·am·ine tr.v. re·ex·am·ined, re·ex·am·in·ing, re·ex·am·ines 1. To examine again or anew; review. 2. Law To question (a witness) again after cross-examination. of the Cross hypothesis. BMJ BMJ n abbr (= British Medical Journal) → vom BMA herausgegebene Zeitschrift 304:343-346. The correspondence section is a public forum and, as such, is not peer-reviewed. EHP EHP abbr. 1. effective horsepower 2. electric horsepower is not responsible for the accuracy, currency, or reliability of personal opinion expressed herein; it is the sole responsibility of the authors. EHP neither endorses nor disputes their published commentary. |
|
||||||||||||||||
Printer friendly
Cite/link
Email
Feedback
Reader Opinion