The Case Against Standardized Testing.Dynamic intellectual life is being pushed out of schools as testing takes over the curriculum. This constitutes an educational emergency, in the view of Alfie Kohn  This article or section is written like a personal reflection or and may require .Please [ improve this article] by rewriting this article or section in an . , author of The Case Against Standardized Testing. Kohn's format is to ask a series of general questions about standardized tests and respond in detail with his (and others') reasons for opposing this form of testing. On the question of high-stakes testing A high-stakes test is an assessment which has important consequences for the test taker. If the examinee passes the test, then the examinee may receive significant benefits, such as a high school diploma or a license to practice law. , Kohn points out that teaching to the test has radically changed the kind of instruction offered in American schools. He believes teachers feel obliged o·blige v. o·bliged, o·blig·ing, o·blig·es v.tr. 1. To constrain by physical, legal, social, or moral means. 2. to set aside regular curriculum for days or weeks to assist students in learning test-taking skills and to drill them on what it is believed will be asked on the test. Kohn criticizes all standardized tests for ignoring the most important characteristics of a good learner: initiative, creativity, conceptual thinking Conceptual thinking is problem solving or thinking based on the cognitive process of conceptualization --is a process of independent analysis in the creative search for new ideas or solutions, which takes as its starting point that none of the accepted constraints of and judgment, among others. The author also decries the inevitability of the standardized test movement, contending such tests have not always existed and do not exist in other countries. What he is fighting, he says, is "not a force of nature, but a force of politics." Kohn describes situations familiar to school leaders but less known to parents and politicians. This brief but provocative book is a useful refresher course against standardized testing. Right now, it's politically incorrect politically incorrect adj. Disregarding or unconcerned with political correctness. political incorrectness n. Adj. 1. , but certainly worth reading. (The Case Against Standardized Testing, by Alfie Kohn, Heinemann, 361 Hanover St., Portsmouth, N.H. 03801, 2000, 94 pp., $10 softcover soft·cov·er adj. Not bound between hard covers: softcover books; a softcover edition. ) |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Printer friendly
Cite/link
Email
Feedback
Reader Opinion