Printer Friendly
The Free Library
5,674,334 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

The Austrian Supreme Court Has Confirmed That the Arbitration Award Dated November 26, 2004 Does Not Affect Vivendi's Rights with Respect to Its Investment in PTC.


PARIS Paris, in Greek mythology
Paris or Alexander, in Greek mythology, son of Priam and Hecuba and brother of Hector. Because it was prophesied that he would cause the destruction of Troy, Paris was abandoned on Mt.
 -- On December 18, 2006 the Austrian Supreme Court delivered a final judgment in the dispute between Vivendi's subsidiary Elektrim Telekomunikacja ("Telco"), Deutsche Telekom Deutsche Telekom AG (ISIN: DE0005557508, FWB: DTE, NYSE: DT, LSE: DEU, TYO: 9496 ) (abbreviated DTAG) is a telecommunications company headquartered in Bonn, Germany. It is the largest telecommunications company in Germany and in the EU.  and Elektrim with respect to the arbitration award An arbitration award (or arbitral award) is a determination on the merits by an arbitration tribunal in an arbitration, and is analogous to a judgment in a court of law.  issued in Austria dated November 26, 2004.

The Supreme Court confirmed that Telco was not a party to that arbitration, which was between DT and Elektrim alone, and therefore that the arbitration award dated November 26, 2004 could not affect Telco's rights. Thus Telco's ownership of 48% of PTC (PTC, Needham, MA, www.ptc.com) Long a world leader in mechanical computer-aided design, manufacturing and engineering software, PTC, through acquisitions and reorganization, has transformed itself into a leading provider of Internet-based B2B solutions for discrete manufacturers.  cannot be challenged on the basis of the Vienna arbitration.

After the arbitration tribunal, the court at first instance and the Vienna Appeal Court, the Austrian Supreme Court is the fourth tribunal to confirm the position taken by Telco and Vivendi, which had throughout been disputed by DT and Elektrim in their attempt to strip Telco of its 48% stake in PTC.

The Supreme Court definitively and unambiguously rejected the interpretation put forward by Deutsche Telekom and Elektrim, according to according to
prep.
1. As stated or indicated by; on the authority of: according to historians.

2. In keeping with: according to instructions.

3.
 which the arbitration was binding on Telco and therefore had the effect of stripping it of its investment in PTC without any compensation being due. This voluntarily erroneous interpretation was based on a extract from the arbitration award to distort its meaning.

DT is the party that commenced the arbitration proceedings which resulted in the award being issued in Vienna in 2004. By bringing their dispute before the Vienna arbitration tribunal, DT and Elektrim undertook that they would abide by and apply in good faith the judgment of the tribunal and its final interpretation by the Austrian Supreme Court.

Deutsche Telekom, which claims to be the owner of the 48% stake in PTC, is now therefore obliged o·blige  
v. o·bliged, o·blig·ing, o·blig·es

v.tr.
1. To constrain by physical, legal, social, or moral means.

2.
 to return it to Telco without delay.

Extracts from the judgment follow:

"Upon the action of the first Defendant [DT] the arbitral tribunal An arbitral tribunal (or arbitration tribunal) is a panel of one or more adjudicators which is convened and sits to resolve a dispute by way of arbitration. The tribunal may consist of a sole arbitrator, or there may be two or more arbitrators  had determined with final and binding effect only against the second Defendant [Elektrim] that the transfer of shares in Polska Telefonia Cyfrowa, established in 1995, from the second Defendant [Elektrim] to the Plaintiff [Telco] was legally ineffective. As regards the Plaintiff [Telco] the arbitral tribunal passed a decision on lack of jurisdiction stating explicitly that in the arbitration proceedings it [the Arbitral Tribunal] thus could not deal with claims asserted by the first Defendant [DT] against the Plaintiff [Telco]"

"In the present case the arbitral ar·bi·tral  
adj.
Of or relating to arbiters or arbitration.

Adj. 1. arbitral - relating to or resulting from arbitration; "the arbitral adjustment of the controversy"; "an arbitrational settlement"
arbitrational
 award has the effect of a final and binding court judgement between the parties. Hence, it follows beyond any doubt that the effect of a final and binding arbitral award - as well as a court judgement - does in principle only extend to the parties" O

"It is a condition precedent condition precedent n. 1) in a contract, an event which must take place before a party to a contract must perform or do their part. 2) in a deed to real property, an event which has to occur before the title (or other right) to the property will actually be in the  to the affirmation of the standing to file an annulment annulment

Legal invalidation of a marriage. It announces the invalidity of a marriage that was void from its inception. It is to be distinguished from dissolution or divorce. To justify annulment, the marriage contract must have a defect (e.g.
 claim against an arbitral award that the arbitral award pursuant to its objective content interferes with the rights of the Plaintiff [Telco] asserting the annulment [of the award]. This is not the case here."

Important disclaimer:

This press release contains forward-looking statements forward-looking statement

A projected financial statement based on management expectations. A forward-looking statement involves risks with regard to the accuracy of assumptions underlying the projections.
 with respect to the financial condition, results of operations, business, strategy and plans of Vivendi. Although Vivendi believes that such forward-looking statements are based on reasonable assumptions, such statements are not guarantees of future performance. Actual results may differ materially from the forward-looking statements as a result of a number of risks and uncertainties, many of which are outside our control, including, but not limited to, the risks described in the documents Vivendi filed with the Autorite des Marches Financiers (French securities regulator) and which are also available in English on our web site (www.vivendi.com). Investors and security holders may obtain a free copy of documents filed by Vivendi with the Autorite des Marches Financiers at www.amf-france.org, or directly from Vivendi. The present forward-looking statements are made as of the date of the present press release and Vivendi disclaims any intention or obligation to provide, update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
COPYRIGHT 2007 Business Wire
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2007, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Publication:Business Wire
Date:Jan 9, 2007
Words:654
Previous Article:mFormation SERVICE MANAGER(TM) Suite Nominated as Finalist for GSM Association Award.
Next Article:Component Orders Rise Again in December.
Topics:



Related Articles
Arbitration for employers: a viable alternative to litigation. (Legal Services Directory)
Workers are blocked, not barred, from court: the Circuit City ruling may seem like a gift to employers seeking to enforce mandatory arbitration...
Congress tackles mandatory arbitration.
Is arbitration right for your company? (Arbitration).
Workers' and voters' rights on court dockets.(CCL report: Center for Constitutional Litigation)
The menace of mandatory arbitration: Arbitration clauses require workers to sign away their rights and take a detour around the courthouse. Although...
Malkin prepares for next round in decade-long Helmsley dispute.(Anthony Malkin managing the case of W and M Properties Inc. with Helmsley-Spear Inc.)
Fighting to end the 'ban litigation' crisis: powerful wrongdoers are trying to deny people an essential constitutional right: access to the courts....
Russian court awards Tamir Sapir $28m in oil dispute.
Illinois high court strikes down class arbitration ban.

Terms of use | Copyright © 2009 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles