The Advocate poll. (reader forum).Reader comments from www.advocate.com * "Although the British tabloids constantly throw out breathless stories at the merest hint of gayness, I think the British people See :
British Overseas Territories are less horrified hor·ri·fy tr.v. hor·ri·fied, hor·ri·fy·ing, hor·ri·fies 1. To cause to feel horror. See Synonyms at dismay. 2. To cause unpleasant surprise to; shock. by the idea than the right-wing fundamentalist Christians who have become such a vocal part of American society." * "There have always been gay rumors regarding the royals, especially Prince Edward Noun 1. Prince Edward - third son of Elizabeth II (born in 1964) Edward Antony Richard Louis, Edward and the queen mother's servants, Since the White House is believed to be predominantly straight and scandal usually spells political death, it would cause more of a stir here." * "With all the half-truths and misinformation mis·in·form tr.v. mis·in·formed, mis·in·form·ing, mis·in·forms To provide with incorrect information. mis that have come from the current administration, the public would probably never hear a word about it," * "The Bush administration has attempted to cozy up with the religious right--a gay rape scandal would not look good in the Bible Belt Bible belt n. Those sections of the United States, especially in the South and Middle West, where Protestant fundamentalism is widely practiced. Bible belt ," Oil "Of course it would be considered more scandalous here--the majority of U.S. society thinks homosexuality is perverse and immoral." In the December 24 issue, readers were asked: Would a gay rape case in the White House be more scandalous than the one currently rocking the royals? No 20% Yes 75% Undecided 5% Note: Table made from pie chart. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||

Printer friendly
Cite/link
Email
Feedback
Reader Opinion