Printer Friendly
The Free Library
22,725,466 articles and books

The 1997 water rights settlement between the state of Montana and the Chippewa Cree tribe of the Rocky Boy's Reservation: the role of community and of the trustee.



I.

INTRODUCTION

Established on September 7, 1916 "for Rocky Boy's Band of Chippewas and ... other homeless Indians,"(1) the Rocky Boy's Reservation is home to over 3,000 Tribal members. The Reservation's annual population growth rate is in excess of three percent.(2) The Reservation has an estimated seventy percent unemployment. Forty-nine percent of the population lives below the poverty line.(3) Although economically dependent on agriculture and ranching, the Reservation's irrigable ir·ri·ga·ble  
adj.
That can be irrigated: irrigable desert. 
 land receives only twelve inches of precipitation precipitation, in chemistry
precipitation, in chemistry, a process in which a solid is separated from a suspension, sol, or solution. In a suspension such as sand in water the solid spontaneously precipitates (settles out) on standing.
 per year.(4)

Water right settlement negotiations began in 1992 among the Chippewa Cree The Chippewa Cree Tribe is a mixed group of Native Americans in Montana, among the last to come into the state. They are descended from Cree that had come south from Canada, and from Chippewa that had moved west from the Turtle Mountains in North Dakota.  Tribe of the Rocky Boy's Reservation, the State of Montana and the United States United States, officially United States of America, republic (2005 est. pop. 295,734,000), 3,539,227 sq mi (9,166,598 sq km), North America. The United States is the world's third largest country in population and the fourth largest country in area.  as part of the state-wide adjudication The legal process of resolving a dispute. The formal giving or pronouncing of a judgment or decree in a court proceeding; also the judgment or decision given. The entry of a decree by a court in respect to the parties in a case.  of water rights. The State held an initial public meeting to inform off-Reservation(5) water users of negotiations at which several hundred citizens expressed concern that the process could not effectively consider their needs. A few expressed their desire for termination of the Reservation and their belief that government representatives were part of an undefined conspiracy.

On January 9, 1997, the Tribal Council This page is about the administrations of Native American tribes and Canadian First Nations peoples. For details about Tribal Council on CBS's Survivor, please see Tribal Council (Survivor)

A Tribal Council
 of the Chippewa Cree Tribe of the Rocky Boy's Reservation passed a resolution approving the water rights compact between the Tribe and the State of Montana, thus settling the Tribe's claims to water within the State of Montana. The Compact passed the Montana Senate The Montana Senate is the upper house of the Montana State Legislature, the state legislative branch of the U.S. state of Montana. The body is composed of 50 senators, and, since the state general elections of November 2004, has had a Democratic majority.  on a 50-0 vote, and the Montana House of Representatives The Montana House of Representatives is, with the Montana Senate, one of the two houses of the Montana Legislature. Composed of 100 members, the House elects its leadership every two years.  on a vote of 91-8. Despite Rocky Boy's Reservation location in an area that has experienced fractious frac·tious  
adj.
1. Inclined to make trouble; unruly.

2. Having a peevish nature; cranky.



[From fraction, discord (obsolete).
 race relations race relations
Noun, pl

the relations between members of two or more races within a single community

race relations nplrelaciones fpl raciales

 for over 100 years, it received the broad-based support of the Tribe, off-Reservation irrigators on all drainages shared with the Reservation, including downstream irrigators on the heavily used Milk River, surrounding communities, local legislators, county commissioners, and rural water users who, as an outgrowth of the Compact, have joined with the Tribe to solve the drinking water drinking water

supply of water available to animals for drinking supplied via nipples, in troughs, dams, ponds and larger natural water sources; an insufficient supply leads to dehydration; it can be the source of infection, e.g. leptospirosis, salmonellosis, or of poisoning, e.g.
 quality and supply problems in the region as a whole. On April 14, 1997, Montana Governor Marc Racicot Marc F. Racicot (IPA pronunciation: [ˈɹɑsko] like "Roscoe") (born July 24, 1948) is a United States Republican Party politician and lobbyist. He was the governor of Montana from 1993 until 2001.  signed the Compact into State law.(6)

The United States Department of the Interior The United States Department of the Interior (DOI) is a Cabinet department of the United States government that manages and conserves most federally owned land. These responsibilities are different from other countries' Interior Departments or ministries, which tend to focus  ("Interior") opposed the Compact, despite involvement in the negotiations.(7) Some individuals regarded the federal opposition as a failure of the United States to fulfill ful·fill also ful·fil  
tr.v. ful·filled, ful·fill·ing, ful·fills also ful·fils
1. To bring into actuality; effect: fulfilled their promises.

2.
 its trust responsibilities. Others saw the federal stance as symptomatic symptomatic /symp·to·mat·ic/ (simp?to-mat´ik)
1. pertaining to or of the nature of a symptom.

2. indicative (of a particular disease or disorder).

3.
 of a breakdown in the federal process for participation in negotiations to settle Indian reserved For the vast tract created by the Royal Proclamation of 1763 in Canada and the United States see: Indian Reserve (1763)

In Canada, an Indian reserve is specified by the Indian Act as a "tract of land, the legal title to which is vested in Her Majesty, that has been
 water rights.(8) To most observers it is merely another example of the inability of Interior to effectively participate in the negotiation of Indian water rights settlements under the rigid, and to some, inappropriate guidelines guidelines,
n.pl a set of standards, criteria, or specifications to be used or followed in the performance of certain tasks.
 set forth in the Criteria and Procedures for Negotiation of Water Rights Settlements.(9) Furthermore, Congress has not ratified rat·i·fy  
tr.v. rat·i·fied, rat·i·fy·ing, rat·i·fies
To approve and give formal sanction to; confirm. See Synonyms at approve.
 a single Indian Water Rights Settlement during the Clinton administration Noun 1. Clinton administration - the executive under President Clinton
executive - persons who administer the law
. The failure of the federal government to effectively participate in and support settlement discussions calls into question its ability to fulfill its role as trustee to the many Indian Tribes INDIAN TRIBE. A separate and distinct community or body of the aboriginal Indian race of men found in the United States.
     2. Such a tribe, situated within the boundaries of a state, and exercising the powers of government and, sovereignty, under the national
 still struggling to settle their water rights.(10)

This paper is an exploration of the Compact, the process that led to this historic agreement, and the breakdown in the federal participation.

II.

THE LEGAL MEASURE OF RESERVED WATER RIGHTS ASSOCIATED WITH INDIAN RESERVATIONS

Allocation of water for use on private land and on public land that has not been reserved for a specific purpose is governed, in general, by state law.(11) However, the federal government may reserve waters under federal law and, in doing so, exempt them from appropriation The designation by the government or an individual of the use to which a fund of money is to be applied. The selection and setting apart of privately owned land by the government for public use, such as a military reservation or public building.  under state law.(12) In 1908 the United States Supreme Court United States Supreme Court: see Supreme Court, United States.  held that the federal government reserved water by implication when it reserved land for the Fort Belknap Indian Reservation The Fort Belknap Indian Reservation is an Indian reservation in north-central Montana, USA. It is shared, ironically, by two groups of Native Americans who have been historically enemies of each other, the Assiniboine and the Gros Ventre tribes.  as water was necessary to fulfill the agricultural purposes of that Reservation.(13)

Federal law determines the volume and scope of reserved water rights.(14) Determinations are made based on the historic documents associated with a treaty, executive order, or statute creating the reservation.(15) The purpose for which the reservation was established determines the quantity of water reserved.(16) Courts generally focus analysis of reserved water rights on either agricultural or fisheries fisheries. From earliest times and in practically all countries, fisheries have been of industrial and commercial importance. In the large N Atlantic fishing grounds off Newfoundland and Labrador, for example, European and North American fishing fleets have long  purposes.(17) Although tribes have often asserted a "homeland" purpose, courts have either rejected this approach(18) or considered a quantification quan·ti·fy  
tr.v. quan·ti·fied, quan·ti·fy·ing, quan·ti·fies
1. To determine or express the quantity of.

2.
 of reserved water for agriculture to be of a sufficient quantity to take into account future needs and thus implicitly provide sufficient water for a homeland purpose.(19)

However, the major legal and factual difficulty faced by the courts in considering reserved water rights disputes has not been that of purpose, but instead the measure of the water right necessary to fulfill that purpose. For example, in a dispute over allocation of water in the Colorado River Colorado River

River, south-central Argentina. Its major headstreams, the Grande and Barrancas rivers, flow southward from the Andes Mountains and meet to form the Colorado near the Chilean border. It flows southeastward across northern Patagonia and the southern Pampas.
 between Arizona and California, the United States asserted claims for reserved water rights on behalf of five Indian Reservations.(20) In adopting a "practicably irrigable acreage" ("PIA pi·a
n.
The pia mater.



pial adj.
") approach the Court accepted the findings of the Special Master rejecting Arizona's proposal to quantify Quantify - A performance analysis tool from Pure Software.  reserved rights on a "reasonably foreseeable fore·see  
tr.v. fore·saw , fore·seen , fore·see·ing, fore·sees
To see or know beforehand: foresaw the rapid increase in unemployment.
 needs" basis -- a standard that would have tied the quantification of the rights to population projections.(21)

The Court had the opportunity to revisit re·vis·it  
tr.v. re·vis·it·ed, re·vis·it·ing, re·vis·its
To visit again.

n.
A second or repeated visit.



re
 the PIA standard when it granted certioari on the quantification of the reserved water rights of the Shoshone and Bannock Bannock (băn`ək), Native North Americans who formerly ranged over wide territory of the N Great Plains and into the foothills of the Rocky Mts. They were concentrated in S Idaho.  Tribes of the Wind River Reservation. However, following recusal recusal n. the act of a judge or prosecutor being removed or voluntarily stepping aside from a legal case due to conflict of interest or other good reason. (See: recuse)  of Justice O'Connor from the case, an evenly divided Court simply affirmed af·firm  
v. af·firmed, af·firm·ing, af·firms

v.tr.
1. To declare positively or firmly; maintain to be true.

2. To support or uphold the validity of; confirm.

v.intr.
 the lower court's use of the PIA standard.(22) Thus, the PIA standard remains the basis on which most parties evaluate their risks should litigation An action brought in court to enforce a particular right. The act or process of bringing a lawsuit in and of itself; a judicial contest; any dispute.

When a person begins a civil lawsuit, the person enters into a process called litigation.
 occur.

A court has never considered the appropriate measure of a reserved water right when the PIA standard leaves a tribe with too little water to irrigate ir·ri·gate
v.
To wash out a cavity or wound with a fluid.
 sufficient land for even its current needs and when water supply is insufficient to provide a reliable source for drinking water for anticipated population growth.(23) Such is the case on the Rocky Boy's Reservation. Agricultural land is limited and water supply consists of high spring runoff Runoff

The procedure of printing the end-of-day prices for every stock on an exchange onto ticker tape.

Notes:
If the "tape is late" then it can take a long time to print off all the closing prices.
 and very low stream flows during the remainder of the year.

III.

RESERVED VERSUS APPROPRIATIVE WATER RIGHTS

Similar to most Western states, Montana follows the doctrine of prior appropriation.(24) A water right exists to the extent of application of water to a beneficial use.(25) In times of shortage, allocation occurs on the basis of priority.(26) The right of the earliest appropriator on a stream is satisfied first. Junior appropriators take the remaining water, if any. This approach leads, eventually, to full appropriation on most streams, and over appropriation in water-short years. Private parties generally initiate allocation in water short years; senior rights place a "call" on the river to prevent diversion by upstream junior water users.(27)

Reserved water rights are defined by federal, not state, law.(28) The Colorado Supreme Court The Colorado Supreme Court is the highest court in the U.S. state of Colorado. It consists of a Chief Justice and six Associate Justices. Powers and duties
Appellate jurisdiction
 summarized the basic incompatibilities between reserved and state-based water rights by noting the following attributes of a reserved water right:
   (1) the right may be created without diversion or beneficial use; (2) the
   priority of the right dates from the time of the land withdrawal and not
   from the date of appropriation; (3) the right is not lost by nonuse; and
   (4) the measure of the right is quantified only by the amount of water
   reasonably necessary to satisfy the purposes of the reservation.(29)


Appropriative and reserved rights are based on two fundamentally distinct policy objectives. The doctrine of prior appropriation seeks to protect, and therefore encourage, development of water.(30) This approach was adopted in the late 1800's when the West was focused on resource exploitation, particularly mining.(31) Necessary to economic development of these arid ar·id  
adj.
1. Lacking moisture, especially having insufficient rainfall to support trees or woody plants: an arid climate.

2.
 regions was protection of water development investments.(32) Thus, a policy of "first in time, first in right" arose. Prior appropriation was not designed to promote community through sharing of scarce resources, nor to provide for long-term sustainable use Sustainable use is the use of resources at a rate which will meet the needs of the present without impairing the ability of future generations to meet their needs. The concept was notably put forth by the Brundtland Commission in 1987. See also
  • http://www.iucn.
 by incorporating planning for future needs. In contrast, the recognition of current and future rights that will accommodate changing need is fundamental to reserved water rights. These rights recognize that a reservation is a finite area in which people intend to settle for generations.

The West has changed since the adoption of prior appropriation law. Water users now view their ranches and communities as the family home for generations to come. Many off-Reservation water users feel that reserved rights that accommodate future needs are inequitable. However, they fail to recognize that the inequity is the result of the state law of prior appropriation, not of the federal law of reserved water rights.

Tribes also see inequities. The clear criteria for quantification of state-based rights may afford greater protection on a practical, daily basis than the vague standards which define unquantified reserved rights. A quantified right is more readily enforced and protected.

In practice, reserved and prior appropriation water rights Prior appropriation water rights, sometimes known as the "Colorado Doctrine", is a system of allocating water rights from a water source that is markedly different from Riparian water rights.  are only compatible to the extent that the reserved water is developed immediately following creation of a reservation. The right to assert a senior priority date when exercising new, previously unquantified uses long after a reservation was created flies in the face of the most fundamental practical feature of prior appropriation -- that junior water users take the river as they find it and can assume all senior rights are accounted for in the observed stream flow.(33) Even though the Winters Doctrine arose in 1908, that the United States did not begin actively to assert reserved water rights on behalf of Indian Tribes until the 1960's, and is only now resolving the quantification of many of those rights aggravates, this tension between people.(34) In the intervening period, population growth and water development in the West has exploded ex·plode  
v. ex·plod·ed, ex·plod·ing, ex·plodes

v.intr.
1. To release mechanical, chemical, or nuclear energy by the sudden production of gases in a confined space:
.

Because watershed watershed, elevation or divide separating the catchment area, or drainage basin, of one river system or group of river systems from another system or group of systems. The term is also often used synonymously with drainage basin.  divides were ignored when political boundaries were drawn, reservations and private land owners rely on shared water resources. Thus, the legal distinctions between reserved water rights and state-based water rights become mired mire  
n.
1. An area of wet, soggy, muddy ground; a bog.

2. Deep slimy soil or mud.

3. A disadvantageous or difficult condition or situation: the mire of poverty.

v.
 in conflict over use, jurisdiction, and concerns of inequity. With the goal of establishing a system in which reserved and state-based water rights can be fully exercised in a shared watershed with minimal conflict, States and Tribes have come to negotiate a means of water allocation and dispute resolution. The following section provides background on the framework established by the State of Montana to encourage negotiated solutions.

IV.

MONTANA GENERAL STREAM ADJUDICATION AND FRAMEWORK FOR NEGOTIATION

Montana is a headwater head·wa·ter  
n.
The water from which a river rises; a source. Often used in the plural.

Noun 1. headwater - the source of a river; "the headwaters of the Nile"
 state for the Columbia, Missouri
This article is about the U.S. city in the state of Missouri. For other uses, see Columbia (disambiguation).


Columbia (IPA: /kə.lʌm.bi.ə) is the fifth largest city in Missouri and the largest city in central Missouri.
 and Hudson Rivers Hudson River

River, New York, U.S. Originating in the Adirondack Mountains and flowing for about 315 mi (507 km) to New York City, it was named for Henry Hudson, who explored it in 1609. Dutch settlement of the Hudson valley began in 1629.
. The State contains twenty-eight percent federal or Tribal land, sixty-nine percent of which is reserved.(35) Of the eighty-five adjudication subbasins(36) in the State, seventy contain claims for reserved water rights(37) Adjudication of water rights associated with these lands is complicated by various factors: checkerboard checkerboard

the pattern of a chess or draft board; used in many circumstances to display the results of mixing a specific number of variables. The variables are listed in columns designated along the horizontal border and the same or different variables in lines along the vertical
 non-Indian ownership of fee land within Indian Reservations; private diversions of water within national forests; pre-existing dams within wilderness areas Broadly, a wilderness area is a region where the land is left in a state where human modifications are minimal; that is, as a wilderness. It might also be called a wild or natural area. (Very low or immaterial human impact or "footprint. ; rivers that form the boundaries to national parks This is a list of national parks ordered by nation. Africa
See also:
  • Algeria
  • Botswana
  • Chad
  • Ethiopia
  • Gabon
  • Kenya
  • Madagascar
  • Morocco
  • Mozambique
  • Namibia
 and Indian reservations and as a result, also form the boundaries to private land; and streams that have headwaters in areas of private land ownership before flowing on to a reservation. Many of the attributes of reserved water rights associated with these complex situations have not been defined by any court. States have attempted to quantify reserved water rights in order to provide notice to existing water users of the potential magnitude of development of future senior tribal uses. To attempt this quantification, a state must join the United States in a suit for adjudication of its reserved water rights and the reserved water rights it holds in trust for the benefit of various Indian tribes. Without an express waiver The voluntary surrender of a known right; conduct supporting an inference that a particular right has been relinquished.

The term waiver is used in many legal contexts.
 of sovereign immunity The legal protection that prevents a sovereign state or person from being sued without consent.

Sovereign immunity is a judicial doctrine that prevents the government or its political subdivisions, departments, and agencies from being sued without its consent.
 by Congress, joinder The union in one lawsuit of multiple parties who have the same rights or against whom rights are claimed as coplaintiffs or codefendants. The combination in one lawsuit of two or more causes of action, or grounds for relief.  of the United States in a suit would not be possible.(38) In 1952, as a rider on the Department of Justice Appropriations Act,(39) Congress passed the McCarran Amendment(40) allowing the United States to be joined in a state adjudication of water rights.(41)

The U.S. Supreme Court subsequently held that the McCarran waiver extends to suits to adjudicate adjudicate (jōō´dikāt´),
v
 reserved water rights.(42) The Court has further held that, although jurisdiction to adjudicate reserved water rights is not exclusive in state court, the policy of McCarran -- to avoid piecemeal piecemeal

patchy, e.g. necrosis of the liver in which groups of hepatocytes are separated by small groups of inflammatory cells and fine, fibrous septa following extension of the inflammatory process beyond the limiting plate.
 adjudication -- counsels in favor of dismissal of federal litigation in deference to a state adjudication in progress.(43) The Court held that waiver of immunity under McCarran extends specifically to a general adjudication involving "`all of the rights of various owners on a given stream.'"(44)

The Montana Water Use Act(45) established a state-wide general adjudication for all state-based water rights in existence prior to July 1, 1973,(46) and for all federal and Indian reserved water rights(47) Water appropriations made under State law after July 1, 1973 must adhere to adhere to
verb 1. follow, keep, maintain, respect, observe, be true, fulfil, obey, heed, keep to, abide by, be loyal, mind, be constant, be faithful

2.
 the permit system established by the Water Use Act.(48) All permits issued prior to completion of the adjudication in the basin containing the water source identified by the permit are provisional.(49) The amount of water in a provisional permit may be reduced or modified on finalization Writing the table of contents (TOC) on a recordable CD or DVD disc. The finalization process ensures that the disc can be played back on most CD and DVD players. See disc-at-once.  of the adjudication.(50) Concurrent with the initiation of the state adjudication, the United States filed suits in federal district court to quantify the reserved water rights associated with the seven Indian Reservations in the State of Montana.(51) Montana sought dismissal of the federal suits in favor of the state adjudication.(52) The United States Supreme Court held that dismissal of the federal suits without prejudice Without any loss or waiver of rights or privileges.

When a lawsuit is dismissed, the court may enter a judgment against the plaintiff with or without prejudice. When a lawsuit is dismissed without prejudice
 is appropriate in deference to state adjudication.(53) The Court further held that states have the authority to assert concurrent jurisdiction The authority of several different courts, each of which is authorized to entertain and decide cases dealing with the same subject matter.

State and federal courts possess concurrent jurisdiction over particular civil lawsuits, such as an action to declare a state law
, pursuant to McCarran, provided that the state proceeding is adequate to adjudicate reserved water rights.(54) The Montana Supreme Court The Montana Supreme Court is the highest court in the U.S. state of Montana. It is established and its powers defined by Article VII of the 1972 Montana Constitution. It is primarily an appellate court which reviews civil and criminal decisions of Montana's trial courts of general  subsequently found the Montana Water Use Act facially adequate to adjudicate federal reserved water rights.(55) It remains to be seen if the Montana adjudication is adequate as applied.(56) Should application of the Water Use Act be found inadequate, the federal cases may be resumed. In the meantime Adv. 1. in the meantime - during the intervening time; "meanwhile I will not think about the problem"; "meantime he was attentive to his other interests"; "in the meantime the police were notified"
meantime, meanwhile
, the settlement of the reserved rights may render the issue of adequacy moot An issue presenting no real controversy.

Moot refers to a subject for academic argument. It is an abstract question that does not arise from existing facts or rights.
.

As part of the 1979 amendments to the Montana Water Use Act, the Montana legislature established the Montana Reserved Water Rights Compact Commission ("Commission").(57) The Commission is charged with negotiating water rights "compacts for the equitable division and apportionment The process by which legislative seats are distributed among units entitled to representation; determination of the number of representatives that a state, county, or other subdivision may send to a legislative body. The U.S.  of waters between the state and its people and the several Indian tribes claiming reserved water rights within the state."(58) The Commission is also authorized au·thor·ize  
tr.v. au·thor·ized, au·thor·iz·ing, au·thor·iz·es
1. To grant authority or power to.

2. To give permission for; sanction:
 to negotiate with the federal government for settlement of reserved water rights associated with non-Indian federal reservations.(59) The Commission acts on behalf of the State and its citizens as a whole. It does not represent the interests of individual water users.(60) The policy of the State of Montana is to conduct negotiations with Indian tribes on a government-to-government basis.(61)

Negotiated compacts must be ratified by the State legislature A state legislature may refer to a legislative branch or body of a political subdivision in a federal system.

The following legislatures exist in the following political subdivisions:
.(62) After ratification The confirmation or adoption of an act that has already been performed.

A principal can, for example, ratify something that has been done on his or her behalf by another individual who assumed the authority to act in the capacity of an agent.
, State law requires entry of a compact in the Montana Water Court which then proceeds to consider the rights of individual water users claiming water in the State adjudication and to enter the negotiated water right in a final decree final decree n. another name for a final judgment. In states where there are interlocutory decrees of divorce (in the hope that a further wait may lead to reconciliation), followed several months later by the actual divorce, the second order is called a final decree,  in which it is integrated with other water rights in the basin.(63) At this stage, individual water users may object to the compact. If any objection is sustained, the court may declare the compact void.(64) The court may not alter the terms of a compact without the written consent of the parties.(65) Therefore, it is in the best interest of all parties to fully consider individual water users' rights and interests during the negotiation process. The Commission's approach to public involvement and the public impact on negotiations is discussed below.

Montana's adherence to a policy of negotiation rather than litigation can be attributed, among other things, to concern for water rights obtained and investments made since creation of a particular federal or Indian reservation, the unique federal attributes of reserved water rights, and the difficulty of integrating the reserved water rights with appropriations made pursuant to State law where private or State interests share a watershed with a reservation. By establishing a clear policy in favor of negotiation, the State of Montana provides a forum to resolve conflicts with practical solutions. Of equal or greater importance, the process of negotiation establishes a dialogue that may open the door to efficient resolution of disputes over water use that arise after the adjudication is complete.

In addition, Indian and federal reservations receive direct benefits from turning undefined water claims into defined water rights. Indian reservations often obtain the means to develop water rights or to receive payment in lieu of Instead of; in place of; in substitution of. It does not mean in addition to.  development.(66) Non-Indian federal reservations, such as national parks or forests, obtain recognition and quantification of rights that may be difficult to protect without precise definition. This is particularly true in the case of instream flow rights.(67)

V.

THE MONTANA - CHIPPEWA CREE COMPACT

A. The Rocky Boy's Reservation

1. The Land Base(68)

The Rocky Boy's Reservation is located in the Bearpaw Mountains with portions extending onto the plains between the mountains and the Milk River in north-central Montana. Historically, the area was part of the large territory north of the Missouri and Musselshell Rivers The Musselshell River is a tributary of the Missouri River, approximately 292 miles (470 km) long, in central Montana in the United States. It rises in several forks in the Crazy, Little Belt, and Castle mountains in central Montana.  designated for the Blackfeet Nation, including the Piegan, Blood, Blackfeet, and Gros Ventres Gros Ventres

(French; “Big Bellies”)

North American Indian group living in north-central Montana, U.S. Known to the Blackfoot as Atsina, they call themselves Ah-ah-nee-nin, meaning “White Clay People.
 Tribes, in a treaty negotiated in 1855.(69) Plains Cree Chief Broken Arm was among the signatories to the treaty,(70) although historians have concluded that he was only present as a witness and that the Cree Tribe was excluded from the peace treaty.(71) Out of this larger territory a Reservation for the Blackfeet, Gros Ventre Gros Ventre (grō văN`trə) [Fr.,=big belly], name used by the French for two quite distinct Native North American groups. One was the Atsina, a detached band of the Arapaho, whose language belongs to the Algonquian branch of the , Piegan, Blood, and River Crow Tribes was established north of the Missouri and Marias Rivers The Marias River is a tributary of the Missouri River, approximately 210 mi (338 km) long, in the U.S. state of Montana. It is formed in the Blackfeet Indian Reservation in Glacier County, in northwestern Montana, by the confluence of the Cut Bank Creek and the Two Medicine River.  on April 15, 1874.(72)

The United States established the Fort Assiniboine
For the fort in Montana, USA, see Fort Assinniboine.


Fort Assiniboine is a historic Hudson's Bay Company trading post in Alberta, Canada, north-west of Edmonton, situated on the Athabasca River at Highway 33.
 military reservation within the large Reservation on March 4, 1880 to protect the non-Indian citizens in the area and to keep peace among the Tribes.(73) A portion of the Fort later became the Rocky Boy's Reservation. On May 1, 1888, the larger reservation was fragmented into three smaller reservations: the Blackfeet, Fort Belknap for the Assiniboine and Gros Ventre, and Fort Peck peck: see English units of measurement.  for the Assiniboine and Sioux.(74) Fort Assiniboine remained as a separate military reservation. Land not included in the new reservations returned to the public domain and was open to homestead.(75) The military reservation was periodically diminished in size to open land to settlement.(76)

On February 11, 1915, Congress authorized the Secretary of the Interior to survey Fort Assiniboine for disposal.(77) The survey was to identify: (1) land suitable for agriculture to be opened for settlement; (2) coal land to be opened for settlement with coal resources reserved to the United States; and (3) timber land to be disposed pursuant to the timber laws.(78) On September 16, 1916, in response to petitions by the leaders of the Chippewa and Cree Tribes in the area, Congress amended the 1915 Act to set aside a 56,035 acre portion of the land for the Rocky Boy's Reservation, specifically designating it for the "Rocky Boy's Band of Chippewas and such other homeless Indians in the State of Montana as the Secretary of the Interior may see fit to locate thereon there·on  
adv.
1. On or upon this, that, or it.

2. Archaic Following that immediately; thereupon.

Adv. 1. thereon - on that; "text and commentary thereon"
on it, on that
."(79) The Reservation contained none of the land in the former military reservation identified as suitable for irrigated agriculture.(80)

The Reservation has been expanded through acquisition and reservation several times since its creation in 1916. The first addition to the Rocky Boy's Reservation was a 556.83 acre area on the southern boundary, added on May 14, 1935.(81) The land was described as "mountainous moun·tain·ous  
adj.
1. Having many mountains.

2. Resembling a mountain in size; huge: mountainous waves.


mountainous
Adjective

1.
 and timbered tim·bered  
adj.
1. Covered with trees; wooded.

2. Made of or framed by timbers, especially exposed timbers.

Adj. 1.
 ... not attractive to homesteaders," but of the type that "can be used beneficially for Indian purposes."(82)

The Indian Reorganization Act Indian Reorganization Act, legislation passed in 1934 in the United States in an attempt to secure new rights for Native Americans on reservations. Its main provisions were to restore to Native Americans management of their assets (mostly land); to prevent further , passed on June 18, 1934, authorized acquisition of lands for Indians.(83) Pursuant to this authority, a 156,000 acre area on the western border of the Reservation was designated as a maximum purchase area for addition of land to Rocky Boy's Reservation.(84) In 1938 the Bureau of Indian Affairs The Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) is an agency of the federal government of the United States within the Department of the Interior charged with the administration and management of 55.7 million acres (87,000 sq.  ("BIA BIA
abbr.
Bureau of Indian Affairs
") purchased roughly 35,500 acres within this area from private landholders for $288,000.(85) The 1930's were difficult times for farmers and ranchers. Exchanges of letters between landowners and the BIA indicate that there were more willing sellers than appropriations for land purchase.(86) The letters also indicate that much of the land was marginal for agricultural purposes.(87)

On March 28, 1939, Congress withdrew all public domain land within the 156,000 acre maximum purchase area and added it to the Reservation.(88) This amounted to roughly 2000 acres of small, scattered Scattered

Used for listed equity securities. Unconcentrated buy or sell interest.
 tracts.(89) The Senate Report accompanying this bill states that purchase of additional acreage within the maximum 156,000 acre area would depend on future appropriations.(90)

An exchange of letters between the Assistant Commissioner of Indian Affairs and the representative of Montana's homeless Indians suggests that land acquisition adjacent to the Reservation in the 1930's was intended to (1) allow expansion of the cattle industry for existing residents of the Reservation; and (2) provide land for settlement of homeless Chippewa Cree and other Montana Indians.(91) The United States held the initial purchases in trust for the Chippewa Cree and other homeless Indians. The purchases were only added to the Reservation in response to agreement with the Chippewa Cree Tribe to enroll more landless land·less  
adj.
Owning or having no land.



landless·ness n.

Adj. 1.
 Indians.(92) In 1958, Congress designated the land for the exclusive use of the Chippewa Cree Tribe of the Rocky Boy's Reservation.(93)

The Tribe and the United States have made several additions to the Reservation since the 1930's. Mineral interests within the purchase area were transferred from the United States to the United States in trust for the Tribe on May 21, 1974.(94) The acquisitions and additions to the Reservation since 1934 contain almost the entire irrigable agricultural base on the Reservation.(95)

2. The Water Supply

In addition to having a limited agricultural land base, the Rocky Boy's Reservation is located in an area of scarce water supply. The region is arid. Annual precipitation averages twelve inches in the Reservation area suitable for growing hay. Snowpack snow·pack  
n.
An area of naturally formed, packed snow that usually melts during the warmer months.



snowpack  

1.
 in the Bearpaw Mountains, which receive an average of thirty inches of precipitation per year, contributes to high spring runoff. The two drainages arising on the Reservation are Big Sandy Creek Big Sandy Creek

A river rising in central Colorado and flowing about 322 km (200 mi) east-northeast and southeast to the Arkansas River.
 and its tributaries and Beaver Creek Beaver Creek may refer to numerous places, mainly stream and towns. The USGS database records 658 waterways and 19 populated places using the name in the United States and numerous others using related forms like Beaver Creek Ditch, Beaver Creek Swamp, Beaver Creek Lake, Beaver . Grazing grazing,
n See irregular feeding.


grazing

1. actions of herbivorous animals eating growing pasture or cereal crop.

2. area of pasture or cereal crop to be used as standing feed. See also pasture.
 and growing hay are the primary land uses. Both creeks flow through Reservation and private farm and ranch land before reaching the Milk River. Off the Reservation, individuals hold irrigation irrigation, in agriculture, artificial watering of the land. Although used chiefly in regions with annual rainfall of less than 20 in. (51 cm), it is also used in wetter areas to grow certain crops, e.g., rice.  claims for approximately 8500 acres in the Big Sandy Creek drainage and 3600 acres in the Beaver Creek drainage.

Beaver Creek has three small storage reservoirs, Two are downstream from the Reservation and one on the Reservation, The reservoirs store spring runoff and, in most years, provide flow year around. As a result, some sprinkler irrigation, if well managed, is considered economically feasible on the Beaver Creek drainage. The upper reaches of Beaver Creek also contain an important trout trout: see salmon.
trout

Any of several prized game and food fishes of the family Salmonidae, native to the Northern Hemisphere but widely introduced elsewhere. Though most species inhabit cool fresh waters, a few (called sea trout; e.g.
 fishery. Hill County Park follows the Creek for approximately fourteen miles from the Reservation down-stream. The Montana Department of Fish, Wildlife and Parks has instream flow rights on this portion of the stream.

Big Sandy Creek follows the bed of the ancestral ANCESTRAL. What relates to or has, been done by one's ancestors; as homage ancestral, and the like.  Missouri River Missouri River

River, central U.S. The longest tributary of the Mississippi River, it rises in the Rocky Mountains of southwestern Montana. It flows east to central North Dakota and south across South Dakota, forming sections of the South Dakota–Nebraska boundary, the
 which, prior to glaciation, flowed north and east along the course of the present day Milk River.(96) As a result, Big Sandy Creek is a small stream flowing in the deposits of a very large river. This feature, combined with high snowpack and limited precipitation in the summer and fall, means streamflow Streamflow, or channel runoff, is the flow of water in streams, rivers, and other channels, and is a major element of the water cycle. It is one component of the runoff of water from the land to waterbodies, the other component being surface runoff.  on Big Sandy Creek may cease altogether in the late irrigation season of August to September when the stream disappears into its bed of sediments.(97) With the exception of a small reservoir on the Reservation on Box Elder box elder: see maple.
box elder

Hardy and fast-growing tree (Acer negundo), also called ash-leaved maple, of the maple family, native to the central and eastern U.S.
 Creek, a tributary to Big Sandy Creek,there are no reservoirs to hold back spring flows and augment aug·ment  
v. aug·ment·ed, aug·ment·ing, aug·ments

v.tr.
1. To make (something already developed or well under way) greater, as in size, extent, or quantity:
 late season irrigation. The limited water supply does not justify investment in full service irrigation systems such as pivots.(98) Most farmers get by with flood irrigation, if, and when, water is available.(99) Alternating between drought and flood, water supply is either sufficient for everyone or so limited that no one benefits. Moderate years in which irrigators with senior rights would have the right to irrigate at the expense of junior water users are rare.(100) In late summer when irrigation is impractical im·prac·ti·cal  
adj.
1. Unwise to implement or maintain in practice: Refloating the sunken ship proved impractical because of the great expense.

2.
, ranchers primarily rely on stream flow to water stock.

B. The Compact

1. The Negotiation Process

Negotiations of Indian reserved water rights in Montana involve three parties: the Tribe, the Commission, and the United States as trustee for the Tribe. Each party is governed by its own laws and rules for participation in a proceeding. The initial step in negotiation is to discuss the basic elements of the process and attempt to integrate the constraints CONSTRAINTS - A language for solving constraints using value inference.

["CONSTRAINTS: A Language for Expressing Almost-Hierarchical Descriptions", G.J. Sussman et al, Artif Intell 14(1):1-39 (Aug 1980)].
 each party brings to the table. The most important process elements addressed in the Rocky Boy's negotiations were: (1) exchange and use of information; (2) media contacts; and (3) public participation.

a. Exchange and Use of Information

Quantification of Indian water rights requires collection and analysis of technical data on subjects such as soil composition, water supply, land status, climate, topography topography (təpŏg`rəfē), description or representation of the features and configuration of land surfaces. Topographic maps use symbols and coloring, with particular attention given to the shape and elevations of terrain. , viable crop types, and the economics of irrigation. In contrast to litigation, which focuses on historic documents concerning the purposes of the reservation and the irrigability of land, the focus in negotiation is prospective. The needs and future plans of the tribe for sustained development Sustained development refers to economic growth which continues at a steady pace, leading to the ever-increasing general prosperity of a population. This is typically held to require a free market economy.

[1] References

1. ^ George W.
 or resource preservation and the needs of nearby water users to protect their investments drive the solutions. Thus, settlement also requires analysis of conflicting water use, impacts of new development, and analysis of ideas for solutions to water supply problems.

Each technical variable has a range of possible values. If each party were to collect and analyze its own data, negotiation would become mired in efforts to resolve technical issues rather than focus on the issues of policy that negotiators must address. To avoid this pitfall pit·fall  
n.
1. An unapparent source of trouble or danger; a hidden hazard: "potential pitfalls stemming from their optimistic inflation assumptions" New York Times.
, the Commission tries to encourage joint efforts at technical work among the parties. Negotiators then discuss issues of policy from a common database.

Parties would not be comfortable with this open exchange of information and ideas if they might subsequently be used against them should negotiations fail. At the initial stage in the process, the Commission's practice is to negotiate a Memorandum of Understanding A Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) is a legal document describing a bilateral or multilateral agreement between parties. It expresses a convergence of will between the parties, indicating an intended common line of action and may not imply a legal commitment.  ("MOU (Minutes Of Usage) A metric used to compute billing and/or statistics for telephone calls or other network use. ") which includes provisions covering exchange and use of information. The MOU with the Chippewa Cree Tribe and the United States provides that information, including statements and technical data and analysis exchanged in the course of negotiations, are governed by Rule 408 of the Montana and Federal Rules of Evidence The Federal Rules of Evidence generally govern civil and criminal proceedings in the courts of the United States and proceedings before U.S. Bankruptcy judges and U.S. magistrates, to the extent and with the exceptions stated in the rules. Promulgated by the U.S.  preventing use of such information in litigation against the party generating it.(101) Thus, the parties may engage in joint technical work on issues such as water supply and put forward ideas for settlement without concern that their efforts could be used against them should litigation become necessary.

b. Media Contacts

Contact with the media can be highly sensitive Adj. 1. highly sensitive - readily affected by various agents; "a highly sensitive explosive is easily exploded by a shock"; "a sensitive colloid is readily coagulated"  in negotiations. The MOU requires consultation among the parties prior to initiating contact with the media. In response to concerns raised after contacts were initiated by the press with individual parties following negotiating sessions, the parties developed a custom of preparing a joint press release following each Rocky Boy's negotiation to ensure that a unified interpretation of the meeting was presented. This had the collateral benefit of forcing the parties to review in written form and to reach agreement on the substance of a meeting.

c. Public Involvement

Water rights negotiations occur at the government level. In Montana, private water users do not have a seat at the table. Nevertheless, an open process that invites public scrutiny is essential to the negotiation of a viable compact. Local support is essential to obtaining the required legislative ratification. Furthermore, there must be a high level of local understanding, acceptance, and even ownership for smooth implementation of a compact. Finally, individuals who live within a watershed have the greatest knowledge of water supply. Their help in designing and evaluating solutions is essential to the process. They alone know what solutions they can live with.

In addition, pursuant to Article II, Section 9 of the Montana Constitution The Montana Constitution is the primary legal document providing for the self-governance of the U.S. State of Montana. It establishes and defines the powers of the three branches of the government of Montana, and the rights of its citizens. , State law requires that meetings of "all public bodies or agencies" of the state must be open to the public.(102) The Commission is considered to be one of the "public bodies" of the state. While other parties may not be subject to similar open meetings laws, the participation of the Commission in negotiations can only take place within the open meetings requirements of State law. The Chippewa Cree Tribe and the United States agreed to open all negotiations to the public. The Commission published and mailed notice to interested individuals one to two weeks prior to each negotiating session.

The process of public involvement in the Rocky Boy's negotiations evolved from an initial highly contentious public meeting to a close working relationship with individual water users adjacent to the Reservation. As the process evolved, the Commission moved increasingly into the role of facilitator, acting as a conduit conduit /con·du·it/ (kon´doo-it) channel.

ileal conduit  the surgical anastomosis of the ureters to one end of a detached segment of ileum, the other end being used to form a stoma on the
 between water users and the Tribe, and assisting in the design of solutions. The Commission also took the lead in applying for State grants to fund the solutions agreed to in the Compact. The involvement of water users who irrigate in drainages shared with the Reservation shaped these solutions.(103)

As it became apparent that the solution to the Tribe's drinking water needs lay in the importation of water, a separate process evolved in which the Tribe and rural water systems off the Reservation began working together with State assistance to try to solve the drinking water problems of the region as a whole. The involvement of rural water systems in these efforts is an on-going process and continues to have a substantial impact on efforts to seek Congressional approval for the Compact.

On October 29, 1992, the Commission held an initial public meeting in Havre, Montana Havre (IPA [hævɚ]) is a city in Hill County, Montana, United States, said to be named after the city of Le Havre in France.[1][2] The area was originally known as Bullhook Bottoms.  to inform the public that negotiations had started, how the public might comment, and that the Tribe had made an initial proposal for settlement. Approximately 250 concerned citizens attended -- a large turnout considering less than fifty individuals had filed claims for water on the two drainages that are shared with the Reservation. During the meeting statements from members of the public included requests that the Reservation be terminated, opinions that the Reservation was not legally established, and declarations that government employees had no business "taking" people's water and "giving" it to the Indians.

The Tribe's originally proposed transfer of all State lands within the 1939 purchase area to the Tribe as part of the State contribution to settlement fueled the controversy among local citizens. Ranchers with grazing leases on State land considered this proposal to be a threat to their livelihood. In addition, to provide sufficient water for both drinking water and irrigation needs, the Tribe's proposal called for dams on most drainages arising on the Reservation. An extremely expensive solution to the Tribe's water needs, the dams would have serious impacts on water users claiming rights senior to establishment of the Reservation. Downstream water users with rights perfected prior to establishment of the Reservation would have likely challenged this solution in Water Court. Because of the late establishment of the Reservation, there was considerable risk that the court would find the off-Reservation claims to be senior and thus void the Compact.

As an outgrowth of that first public meeting, a private non-profit corporation, Bear Paw (jargon) bear paw - The Vulcan nerve pinch for SGI computers. The five key keyboard combination resets the graphics subsystem, including the window manager.  Resources Alliance ("BPRA BPRA Business Premises Renovation Allowance
BPRA Business Process Reengineering and Analysis
"), was formed by local citizens to monitor and to influence negotiations. Membership in BPRA included water users, landowners, and concerned citizens. The BPRA did not represent the three ranches with senior water rights on Big Sandy Creek and its tributaries. Commission members and staff met frequently with representatives of BPRA. However, to ensure that comment was obtained from all interested water users, to diffuse diffuse /dif·fuse/
1. (di-fus´) not definitely limited or localized.

2. (di-fuz´) to pass through or to spread widely through a tissue or substance.


dif·fuse
adj.
 some of the rhetoric characteristic of early meetings with BPRA, and to focus comment on water-related issues specific to each drainage, the Commission began a process of meeting with individual water users, ranch by ranch.

2. Compact Water Allocation

The Compact allocates to the Tribe 10,000 acre-feet of water from surface and groundwater sources on the Reservation. A portion of the water right reflects a quantification of water necessary to maintain and enhance existing fish and wildlife habitat. Existing stock use is also quantified. Water for new irrigation on land acquired on Big Sandy Creek and its tributaries after 1934 will be made available through expansion of the Tribe's existing reservoir on Box Elder Creek. Water for new recreational uses on the original 1916 Reservation on Beaver Creek, including snow making for the Tribe's ski area in the Bearpaw Mountains, golf course watering, and enhancement of fisheries will be made available through expansion of the Tribe's existing fifty-five acre-feet reservoir on the East Fork East Fork is the name of the following places in the United States of America:
  • East Fork, Arizona
  • East Fork, Pennsylvania
  • East Fork, California
  • East Fork State Park, Ohio
See also East Fork Township, a disambiguation page
 of Beaver Creek to a capacity of 665 acre-feet.(104)

In addition to the allocation of water arising on the Reservation, the Compact includes an agreement between the Tribe and the State to seek an allocation by Congress to the Tribe of 10,000 acre-feet from Lake Elwell, a Bureau of Reclamation Reclamation

A claim for the right to return or the right to demand the return of a security that has been previously accepted as a result of bad delivery or other irregularities in the delivery and settlement process.
 project with abundant water available for contracting which is located approximately fifty miles west of the Reservation.(105)

The Compact does not limit the type of use of the Tribal water right and recognizes the jurisdiction of the Tribe to administer its own water. In compacts negotiated to date, Montana has not disputed jurisdiction over tribal water or the discretion of a tribe to put that water to its best use.(106) Nevertheless, because Montana's political boundaries do not follow watershed boundaries, this clean division between State and Tribal jurisdiction on paper can be difficult to implement. Recognizing these difficulties, the State and the Tribe agreed to allocate water as a block, rather than by priority, and established a forum for resolution of disputes arising between water users on and off the Reservation.

Most western states, including Montana, allocate water in times of shortage in order of priority of the date of development.(107) In dry years, junior priority water users must curtail cur·tail  
tr.v. cur·tailed, cur·tail·ing, cur·tails
To cut short or reduce. See Synonyms at shorten.



[Middle English curtailen, to restrict
 or cease water use so that senior rights are satisfied. This requires close monitoring of stream flow and coordination of diversion.

To avoid daily administration between the Reservation and off-Reservation water users in dry years, the Years, The

the seven decades of Eleanor Pargiter’s life. [Br. Lit.: Benét, 1109]

See : Time
 Compact allocates water as a block for each tributary on which there is both private and Reservation land. The Compact eliminates priority administration between the Tribe and other water users. Provided the Tribe is using water within its allocation, water users off the Reservation agreed not to assert priority over the Tribe's water.(108) Similarly, provided that water users off the Reservation are using water within the amount of their right, the Tribe agreed not to assert priority over state-based rights.(109) It is much simpler to determine whether diversions are within a specified limit than whether there is sufficient water to satisfy all claims in a water-short year, and, if not, whether curtailment Curtailment

The act of contracting or reducing operations of a company in the hope of bringing it financial or operational stability. This management technique is often used when a company has grown too fast and is unable to effectively manage its operations.
 of junior uses will provide any benefit to senior water rights. Block allocation minimizes the interaction necessary and, therefore, the potential interference with the jurisdiction of each sovereign to manage its water.

The factors considered in designing the administration between the Tribal water right and state-based rights are similar to those considered in an equitable apportionment.(110) While the U.S. Supreme Court has rejected the concept of "equitable apportionment" in quantification of Indian reserved water rights,(111) negotiation gave the parties the flexibility to revisit this issue. The result is a quantification of the Tribal water right that follows the Court's guidance by falling within the range of possible practicably irrigable acreage outcomes, but administers that water right as a block allocation or apportionment.(112)

The water supply on the Rocky Boy's Reservation fluctuates from season to season and year to year. As a result, the factors considered by the Commission and the Tribe in designing the administration of water between water users on and off the Reservation are similar to those considered by the Supreme Court in an equitable apportionment. Thus, the presence of return flow was considered a mitigating factor in determining the impact of Tribal irrigation on downstream water use. The parties considered the waste resulting from carriage loss(113) in determining whether releases from Tribal reservoirs is an appropriate means to protect senior downstream water users. Coordination of storage on and off the Reservation is used to maximize efficiency. The factors considered in administering the water right as a block were also used to prevent any impact on potential senior water rights.

The measures taken to administer the water allocation as a block and to protect potentially senior water users are as follows. First, to give effect to the allocation by preventing further demands on a short water supply, the drainages are closed to new permits for water use under state law. Second, the Compact calls for release of water from enlarged reservoirs on the Reservation to mitigate impacts on downstream water use. Two ranches off the Reservation currently rely on high spring flows from Box Elder Creek to irrigate. Enlargement enlargement,
n an increase in size.

enlargement, Dilantin,
n.pr See hyperplasia, gingival, Dilantin.

enlargement, idiopathic,
n
 of the Tribe's reservoir on Box Elder Creek will allow storage of spring run-off for the Tribe, but will impact spring irrigation on these ranches. The Tribe has agreed to release a pool of stored water for use on the ranch closest to the enlarged reservoir. To minimize the amount of release necessary, the State will provide a grant to install a pipeline to replace the existing ditch ditch (ditching),
n the undesirable loss of tooth substance in the region of a restoration margin (usually gingival).
 for conveyance The transfer of ownership or interest in real property from one person to another by a document, such as a deed, lease, or mortgage.


conveyance n.
 of the water.(114) Without this improvement in conveyance efficiency, a much larger release would be necessary. Release of stored water for the ranch farther downstream would be highly inefficient. Instead, a State grant will allow renovation of the existing diversion and conveyance structure to allow use of water at the lower stream flow predicted to occur once storage is enlarged on the Reservation.

Third, the Compact calls for a release from the Tribe's reservoir to maintain late season water quality for senior downstream stock watering. Irrigation is minimal on Lower Big Sandy Creek. However, ranchers rely heavily on stream flow to water stock. Return flow from use of stored spring runoff to irrigate on the Reservation could actually improve stream flow during late summer, when the unregulated Adj. 1. unregulated - not regulated; not subject to rule or discipline; "unregulated off-shore fishing"
regulated - controlled or governed according to rule or principle or law; "well regulated industries"; "houses with regulated temperature"

2.
 flow of Big Sandy Creek often disappears into its bed of sand and gravel deposited by the ancestral Missouri River.(115) However, soils in the area are locally saline saline /sa·line/ (sa´len) (sa´lin) salty; of the nature of a salt; containing a salt or salts.

normal saline , physiological saline physiologic saline solution.
. Ranchers expressed concern that return flows could degrade TO DEGRADE, DEGRADING. To, sink or lower a person in the estimation of the public.
     2. As a man's character is of great importance to him, and it is his interest to retain the good opinion of all mankind, when he is a witness, he cannot be compelled to disclose
 water quality beyond suitability for stock. Adding to this concern, the Tribe's development plan calls for mixing of saline groundwater with surface water to supplement irrigation, thereby increasing the total salts on the land. Furthermore, to accomplish the groundwater mixing, the Tribe's plan called for temporary storage of surface water in ponds. To mitigate potential impacts on water quality of saline return flow, application of saline water Saline water is a general term for water that contains a significant concentration of dissolved salts (NaCl). The concentration is usually expressed in parts per million (ppm) of salt. , and saline seep A saline seep is formed through excess water entering into the ground, which eventually raises the water table. This movement causes the groundwater to flow down slope and flow through subsoil. Eventually the salt in the groundwater discharges on the soil surface. ,(116) the Tribe agreed to hold a pool of water in the enlarged reservoir for release at the request of downstream water users in late summer. The water is designated for maintenance of stream flow and water quality and cannot be diverted di·vert  
v. di·vert·ed, di·vert·ing, di·verts

v.tr.
1. To turn aside from a course or direction: Traffic was diverted around the scene of the accident.

2.
 by water users.

Fourth, coordinated use of reservoirs on and off Reservation on Beaver Creek will mitigate impacts on downstream senior water rights. Increased storage and diversion from Beaver Creek on the Reservation could impact downstream irrigators with a senior right to divert di·vert  
v. di·vert·ed, di·vert·ing, di·verts

v.tr.
1. To turn aside from a course or direction: Traffic was diverted around the scene of the accident.

2.
 from natural stream flow. Yet release of water from the small reservoir on the Reservation to these irrigators would be highly inefficient due to carriage loss, and would prevent realization of the Tribe's development plan. Lower Beaver Creek Reservoir, owned by Hill County and located down-stream from the Reservation, had contract water available for irrigation when contracts were renewed in 1996. The State entered an Option to Purchase contract water for release to mitigate impacts from development of the Tribe's right. In effect,this transfers any call for water by senior water users from the Tribe's diversions to Lower Beaver Creek Reservoir.

Fifth, the Compact protects instream flows in Beaver Creek. The Tribe, State and Hill County are mutually interested in maintaining the health of the trout fishery in upper Beaver Creek. The Tribe and the Montana Department of Fish, Wildlife and Parks agreed jointly to study the availability of water to maintain minimum in-stream flows. Pending completion of the study, the Tribe agreed to release water to maintain a critical flow of one cubic feet per second A cubic foot per second (also cfs, cusec and ft³/s) is an Imperial unit / U.S. customary unit volumetric flow rate, which is equivalent to a volume of 1 cubic foot flowing every second. , a release which may be necessary in winter and in late summer of some years to prevent fish kill.

Finally, the Compact provides that any change in water use by the Tribe from the uses specified must be accomplished without impact on off-Reservation water users. The Tribe has discretion to determine what measures to take to prevent impact, including release of water from reservoirs and modification in use of water on the Reservation. In addition, on Beaver Creek the Tribe must use water only within a specified net depletion. Thus, if the new use consumes a larger percentage of the water diverted, the Tribe must reduce its diversion.

3. Dispute Resolution

Jurisdiction over issues arising both on and off a reservation is generally a matter of dispute.(117) State, Tribal, or Federal courts are all jurisdictional possibilities. The U.S. Supreme Court has not considered whether the McCarran Amendment waiver of sovereign immunity for the adjudication of water rights extends to administration of that water right.(118)

In general, courts retain jurisdiction over adjudicated water rights. Thus it is reasonable to conclude that Congress addressed both adjudication and administration when it considered the McCarran Amendment.(119) Under this reasoning, the State court would have jurisdiction. Nevertheless, it is also true that a waiver of sovereign immunity will be viewed narrowly, and must be express.(120) Under this argument, the State court might not have jurisdiction. As a practical matter, addressing jurisdictional issues when a dispute arises inhibits timely resolution of the dispute. The irrigation season is short in Montana. The appeals process, whether in federal, State, or Tribal court, is long. To an irrigator irrigator,
n dental tool used to force liquid through a given area for irrigation; features a soft tube that draws liquid from a contained source. See also irrigation.
 with a head gate opening on a dry stream, questions of jurisdiction are simply another barrier to a solution. Negotiation allows governments to avoid jurisdictional issues and to design instead a practical solution that recognizes local needs.

To avoid the issue of jurisdiction and to provide a forum in which both the State and the Tribe have a voice, the Compact establishes a Compact Board to hear disputes. The Board has one Tribal appointee APPOINTEE. A person who is appointed or selected for a particular purpose; as the appointee under a power, is the person who is to receive the benefit of the trust or power. , one State Appointee, and a third member selected by the other two. The Board has jurisdiction to hear disputes concerning interpretation of the Compact or disputes arising between a user of the Tribal water and a user of a state-based water right.

Waivers of sovereign immunity are necessary to bring the State, Tribe, or United States into Compact Board proceedings. The State and Tribe agreed to such waivers. The United States Department of Justice “Justice Department” redirects here. For other uses, see Department of Justice.
The United States Department of Justice (DOJ) is a Cabinet department in the United States government designed to enforce the law and defend the interests of the United States
 ("Justice") opposes waivers of sovereign immunity in general, and has opposed waiver of sovereign immunity for the United States for Compact Boards in previous Montana settlements.(121) Viewing federal policy allowing waiver of sovereign immunity for the Tribe, but not the United States in its capacity as trustee, as inconsistent, the State and the Tribe did not draft the Compact to reflect the position of the Department of Justice. Instead, the State and the Tribe drafted the Rocky Boy's Compact to allow Congress to determine the appropriate policy.(122) Assuming Justice's stance -- to protect the United States from being drawn into suit -- is appropriate, the general rule of avoidance The rule of avoidance was a rule employed in the Sui Dynasty in China for the appointment of officials. A system similar to this was adopted by Emperor Akbar of the Mughal Empire to prevent corruption and favoritism.  of waiver of sovereign immunity should not apply in the special case of trusteeship. The forum for dispute resolution agreed to by the State and the Tribe becomes merely advisory when the trustee cannot be joined. Furthermore, it leaves the Tribe no recourse if the United States as trustee refuses to assist it in a Compact Board proceeding. The State and the Tribe hope Congress will see the validity of their argument for waiver of the immunity of the United States.(123)

D. The Drinking Water System

Through efforts to quantify the Reservation water rights, it became clear that the existing domestic water supply on the Reservation is deficient de·fi·cient
adj.
1. Lacking an essential quality or element.

2. Inadequate in amount or degree; insufficient.



deficient

a state of being in deficit.
 in both quality and supply.(124) When the Indian Health Service The Indian Health Service (IHS) is an Operating Division (OPDIV) within the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services responsible for providing federal health services to American Indians and Alaska Natives.  developed the system it relied on the fractured Fractured is the Industrial Music band created by Canadian Nick Gorman in 2003. Located in Toronto Canada, his self produced release CD-R demo entitled Contami-Nation caught the attention of European label Dependent Records, who signed them.  volcanic rocks rocks which have been produced from the discharges of volcanic matter, as the various kinds of basalt, trachyte, scoria, obsidian, etc., whether compact, scoriaceous, or vitreous.

See also: Volcanic
 that form the Bear Paw Mountains The Bear Paw Mountains (aka The Bears Paw Mountains) are a small island-mountain range in North-Central Montana, USA, located approximately 10 miles South of Havre. Mt. Baldy, which rises nearly 7,000 feet above sea-level, is the highest peak in the range.  as an aquifer aquifer (ăk`wĭfər): see artesian well.
aquifer

In hydrology, a rock layer or sequence that contains water and releases it in appreciable amounts.
.(125) The aquifer has proven inadequate. Wells frequently shut down and community water supplies have been periodically turned off.(126) Surface water as an alternative source is not available in reliable enough quantities to satisfy both irrigation and domestic needs.(127) Efforts to solve this problem evolved beyond the scope of Compact negotiations and are now being addressed in a separate, though related, process. That process is without precedent in both its character and level of tribal-non-tribal cooperation.(128)

Due to the limited and unreliable nature of the on-Reservation water supply, the Tribe and the State became convinced that alternative sources of supply must be considered if the Tribe was to receive adequate and safe drinking water. The discussion turned to off-Reservation water sources. An off-Reservation irrigator suggested importing domestic water through construction of a rural water supply system as a solution.

Many communities near the Reservation face similar drinking water problems.(129) Because groundwater in the area is both limited and of poor quality, communities have constructed small rural water systems to pipe surface water to households that would otherwise be forced to haul water.(130) Nine municipal systems and fifteen rural water systems in the area serve populations ranging from seventy and 10,500 people.(131) As a result of changes in Safe Drinking Water Act The Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) is a United States federal law passed by the U.S. Congress on December 16, 1974. It is the main federal law that ensures safe drinking water for Americans. (132) standards, obsolescence ob·so·les·cent  
adj.
1. Being in the process of passing out of use or usefulness; becoming obsolete.

2. Biology Gradually disappearing; imperfectly or only slightly developed.
, and increases in population or service area, each of the systems faces the need for major modifications or repairs in the next ten years.(133)

To determine if these various rural water and municipal systems could be combined with the Tribe's to achieve safe drinking water, the following questions had to be answered: (1) is there a process for analyzing the feasibility of a large regional rural water system in which both the Tribe and the off-Reservation communities could be represented?; (2) is it technically feasible to serve an area covering roughly 6000 square miles A square mil is a unit of area, equal to the area of a square with sides of length one mil. A mil is one thousandth of an international inch. This unit of area is usually used in specifying the area of the cross section of a wire or cable.  with a single regional water system?; and (3) are there economic and water quality benefits to combining the existing systems into a single regional water system?

The Tribe and the off-Reservation systems have found a way to work together. As community and rural water systems began to express an interest in working with the Chippewa Cree to solve regional drinking water problems, the Commission realized that design and implementation of a regional water system was beyond its expertise. More importantly, the Commission, authorized to settle reserved water rights, could not adequately represent the interests of the off-Reservation communities. At a meeting facilitated by the Commission between the Tribe and the off-Reservation systems, an Ad Hoc Committee ad hoc committee A committee formed with the purpose of addressing a specific issue or issues, which theoretically is disbanded once its raison d'etre is finished  was formed, consisting of three Tribal members and three system members, to coordinate a feasibility study "A Feasibility Study" is an episode of the original The Outer Limits television show. It first aired on 13 April, 1964, during the first season. It was remade in 1997 as part of the revived The Outer Limits series with a minor title change.  for a regional water system.

In response to a joint request from Governor Marc Racicot, the Tribe, the Commission, and the feasibility study The analysis of a problem to determine if it can be solved effectively. The operational (will it work?), economical (costs and benefits) and technical (can it be built?) aspects are part of the study. Results of the study determine whether the solution should be implemented.  committee, Senators Burns (R-MT) and Baucus (D-MT) and former Congressman Williams (D-MT) obtained a $300,000 supplemental appropriation to the 1996 EPA EPA eicosapentaenoic acid.

EPA
abbr.
eicosapentaenoic acid


EPA,
n.pr See acid, eicosapentaenoic.

EPA,
n.
 budget for the feasibility study.(134) The Ad Hoc Committee, the Montana Department of Natural Resources Many sub-national governments have a Department of Natural Resources or similarly-named organization:
Australia
  • Queensland Department of Natural Resources and Mines
Canada
  • Natural Resources Canada
 and Conservation, and the Commission obtained an additional $80,000 in State funding for the feasibility study, and $100,000 for project coordination and other expenses from the 1997 Montana Legislature.(135)

With these resources, the Ad Hoc Committee agreed to select an engineer. The Ad Hoc Committee meets approximately once per month for progress reports on the study. The Committee has begun the process of discussing the ownership, maintenance and construction of the system. The Committee has also begun the process of transmitting information to interested communities and rural water systems to provide them a basis for consideration of whether to pursue the proposed regional system.

The feasibility study was scheduled for completion in the fall of 1997.(136) The unprecedented effort the Tribe and off-Reservation communities have undertaken to determine the feasibility of a regional system will have benefits regardless of the outcome. Although definitive answers to the questions of technical and economic feasibility will not be available until the feasibility study is completed, the proposed system does appear reasonable when compared to other regional systems authorized by Congress. The Rocky Boy's/North Central Regional Water Supply System proposes to solve the regional problem by utilizing the existing infrastructure. The value of the existing distribution systems, funded primarily through loans, is part of the local contribution to cost and significantly reduces the total amount of new funding necessary.

The Department of the Interior was not satisfied with the focus of the study. Although it may be feasible for the region as a whole, Interior is not convinced that it is the best alternative for service to the Reservation. Among other things, Interior objected to the fact that water sources on the Reservation were rejected as a source at an early stage. These sources were rejected on the basis of inadequate water supply.

Interior also indicated that the importation of water to the Reservation may be beyond the scope of the settlement of reserved water. As discussed above, quantification of reserved water rights is limited by supplies available on the Reservation. Courts have not addressed the situation at Rocky Boy's where need exceeds supply.(137) Without a showing of Congressional intent, tribal need alone would not be likely to give rise to a reserved water right for imported water. However, the State and the Tribe have argued that, in the absence of an adequate supply, there is a trust obligation on the part of the United States to provide water to meet basic needs.(138) The difficulties encountered in federal participation on this issue and on Compact negotiations in general are detailed in the next section.

VI.

FEDERAL PARTICIPATION

President Bush articulated the Federal Government's policy to negotiate settlement of Indian water rights claims and to establish guidelines to determine appropriate settlement contributions in 1989.(139) The President's statements recognized the difficulty of applying "hard-and-fast rules" to determine settlement contributions in light of complex issues, and committed the Administration to "establishing criteria and procedures to guide future Indian land and water claim settlement negotiations."(140)

Pursuant to President Bush's statements, the Department of the Interior published Criteria and Procedures for federal participation in Indian water rights settlements.(141) The Criteria and Procedures were never submitted for comment to those they most affect, i.e. tribes and states. Interior has recently opened a dialogue with Tribes to discuss the settlement process, but has not indicated a willingness to revisit the Criteria and Procedures or to include states in the dialogue. The Clinton Administration continues to follow the Criteria and Procedures.

Two major weaknesses in the Criteria and Procedures have led to a hiatus hiatus /hi·a·tus/ (hi-a´tus) [L.] an opening, gap, or cleft.hia´tal

aortic hiatus  the opening in the diaphragm through which the aorta and thoracic duct pass.
 in participation and approval of settlements by Interior: (1) participation procedures delay federal decisions on positions until a settlement concept is completed, thus preventing federal input to the formulation of a solution; and (2) the criteria for determining federal settlement contribution focuses on the United States' legal exposure to a resource claim by the Tribe, rather than the need, merit and feasibility of projects associated with a settlement as trustee.

A. Procedures for Federal Participation in Negotiations

The Criteria and Procedures provides guidelines for federal participation in negotiations. The Federal Government participates in negotiations through a local federal team composed of representatives of various Bureaus within the Department of the Interior and a representative of the Department of Justice. However, all decisions are made through the Working Group on Indian Water Rights Settlements, composed of Assistant Secretaries and a Counselor to the Secretary in Washington D.C.(142) The Criteria and Procedures requires an evaluation of all positions, assessment of the value of the claim, and allocation of contributions by the local team before the Federal Government may make any representations on likely positions.(143) Considerable effort is spent in considering a settlement's precedential prec·e·den·tial  
adj.
1. Of, relating to, or constituting a precedent.

2. Having precedence.

Adj. 1. precedential
 impact on other settlements.

This delay in formulating a federal position decisions is in direct conflict with the dynamic necessary for a successful negotiation in which participation must be active, flexible and timely to be effective. In a negotiation, new avenues for resolving problems are explored on almost a daily basis. Each new settlement concept triggers a re-evaluation of positions thought settled and identifies new issues collateral to the new solution. Negotiators must have the ability and authority to respond substantively to new proposals. Positions and necessary financial contributions to settlement are in flux flux

In metallurgy, any substance introduced in the smelting of ores to promote fluidity and to remove objectionable impurities in the form of slag. Limestone is commonly used for this purpose in smelting iron ores.
 until a final settlement is reached. A delicate balance between competing interests is achieved. By the time Interior is prepared to respond, there are generally too many interests in compromises already reached for States and Tribes to alter their positions in response to federal feed-back.

In the Rocky Boy's negotiations, the Federal Government delayed comment on specific issues of water allocation on the Reservation for two years because the final cost figures for importing drinking water to the Reservation were unknown.(144) Official federal comments were not made until the Compact was before the State legislature for ratification.(145) At that time Interior opposed the settlement.(146) Interior's focus on its role in protecting federal funds Federal Funds

Funds deposited to regional Federal Reserve Banks by commercial banks, including funds in excess of reserve requirements.

Notes:
These non-interest bearing deposits are lent out at the Fed funds rate to other banks unable to meet overnight reserve
 rather than its role as trustee caused the Federal Government to miss the opportunity to influence or contribute to the resolution of specific issues concerning water allocation on drainages arising on the Reservation.

B. Criteria for Federal Contribution to Settlement

The criteria for determining contributions to settlement provide that "Federal contributions to a settlement should not exceed the sum of ... calculable cal·cu·la·ble  
adj.
1. That can be calculated or estimated: calculable odds.

2. Readily relied on; dependable: a calculable assistant.
 legal exposure [and] Federal trust or programmatic pro·gram·mat·ic  
adj.
1. Of, relating to, or having a program.

2. Following an overall plan or schedule: a step-by-step, programmatic approach to problem solving.

3.
 responsibilities ... [that] cannot be funded through a normal budget process."(147) In practice, Interior's primary focus has been on litigation exposure. Valuing a settlement by assessing litigation exposure is a standard approach in civil litigation. Is it cheaper to settle or to litigate? However, this is not an appropriate approach when the settling party is the trustee.(148)

Federal litigation exposure in water settlements is measured, in part, by the value of the resource that the United States allegedly failed to protect. As such, a resource-rich Tribe may settle for as much water as it could possibly need and receive the economic means to develop that water by obtaining the value of the water it gives up. In contrast, a resource-poor Tribe must settle for a water supply already insufficient to meet basic needs and receives insufficient economic means to develop even that supply because it has nothing to give up.

The Rocky Boy's Reservation is land and water poor. Documents and legislative history associated with the original establishment of the Reservation and acquisition of Reservation land reveals the lack of irrigable land.(149) Even the small quantity of water -- 10,000 acre-feet per year -- agreed to in the Compact(150) will not be available in dry years. Under the Criteria and Procedures, once a reservation is established in an area with too little water for survival, it cannot be remedied. This outcome gives rise to the question: is it appropriate for the trustee to value its assistance toward Reservation water development in terms of the value of the resource base rather than by the needs of the Reservation and the merits of the project? Interior's focus on legal exposure rather than trustee responsibility prevents a three party exploration of this question. This result is particularly inequitable when the documents associated with the reservation's establishment and expansion indicate federal recognition of the inadequacy of the land and water base.

The focus on litigation exposure caused Interior to focus criticism on the aspect of negotiations addressing the Tribe's drinking water needs at the expense of providing input to efforts to resolve conflicts between water use on and off the Reservation. The State and Tribe concluded early in negotiations that Reservation water supply is inadequate to meet both agricultural and drinking water needs.(151) Furthermore, the wide fluctuations in water supply between years of drought and abundance render Reservation supplies more suitable for agriculture because of its higher tolerance for shortage.

The Department of the Interior initially suggested that the enlarged reservoir in Box Elder Creek be used to meet domestic needs rather than to expand irrigation. Interior believed its proposal cost less and was more readily justified by litigation exposure than the cost of importing drinking water.(152) The State and the Tribe feel that this least-cost approach would be devastating dev·as·tate  
tr.v. dev·as·tat·ed, dev·as·tat·ing, dev·as·tates
1. To lay waste; destroy.

2. To overwhelm; confound; stun: was devastated by the rude remark.
 to the Reservation. At the present population growth rate,(153) existing Reservation agriculture would eventually need to be retired and the system would eventually become inadequate to serve the Tribe's drinking water needs.(154) In the meantime, the agricultural economic base of the Reservation would have been destroyed.

In response to these concerns, Interior proposed to purchase hay for the Reservation on an on-going basis. Replacing agriculture with an on-going subsidy may be the least expensive means to meet the Tribe's needs, but it is also contrary to (1) the federal policy of Indian self-determination, (2) the federal policy toward development of irrigated lands in the west in general, and (3) the Federal Criteria and Procedures on Indian Water Rights Settlements.

The current federal policy favoring Indian self-determination ended the 1943-61 era policy of termination of federal assistance to Tribes, and repudiated the practice of paternalism paternalism (p·terˑ·n .(155) The notion that a tribe should forego its primary source of jobs and self-sufficiency and permanently accept federal assistance in order to have safe drinking water flies in the face of this repudiation See non-repudiation. .

Cost as the basis for retiring agriculture and replacing it with federal assistance is also contrary to the policies that have governed the relations between the federal government and the predominantly pre·dom·i·nant  
adj.
1. Having greatest ascendancy, importance, influence, authority, or force. See Synonyms at dominant.

2.
 non-Indian western irrigators since the passage of the Reclamation Act in 1902.(156) In passing the Reclamation Act, Congress fully recognized that it was using federal subsidies to achieve social goals.(157) Although in light of environmental consequences, the magnitude of those subsidies and their wisdom may be subject to question today,(158) it is inequitable to draw the line on new development of agriculture at the point it crosses into Indian country Indian country or Indian Country
n.
1. Indian Territory.

2. Federal reservation lands under Native American tribal jurisdiction.
. Drawing a line in subsidizing an agrarian society An agrarian society is one that is based on agriculture as its prime means for support and sustenance. The society acknowledges other means of livelihood and work habits but stresses on agriculture and farming, and was the main form of socio-economic organization for most of  in the west that just happens to be at the Reservation boundary speaks poorly for our society.

Trading economic development for drinking water is also contrary to the Criteria and Procedures for Indian Water Rights Settlements. The Criteria and Procedures specifically state that, in addition to seeking release of claims against the United States and appropriate cost share on settlement, the United States' goals of the negotiating settlements include "participat[ing] in water settlements consistent with the Federal Government's responsibilities as trustee to Indians [and seeing that] Indians obtain the ability as part of each settlement to realize value from confirmed water rights resulting from settlement."(159) How can a settlement that either ignores basic drinking water needs or requires relinquishment RELINQUISHMENT, practice. A forsaking, abandoning, or giving over a right; for example, a plaintiff may relinquish a bad count in a declaration, and proceed on the good: a man may relinquish a part of his claim in order to give a court jurisdiction.  of all economic value from water to meet those needs be consistent with these goals?

The Department of the Interior's response to these arguments was to suggest that irrigated hay land and appurtenant appurtenant adj. pertaining to something that attaches. In real property law this describes any right or restriction which goes with that property, such as an easement to gain access across the neighbor's parcel, or a covenant (agreement) against blocking the  water rights be purchased off the Reservation to replace retired irrigated land on the Reservation. However, the only parcel for sale large enough to serve the need was over an hour's drive from the Reservation on the Milk River. It was unlikely that the Tribe could employ members to work the land. Furthermore, the Milk River is the site of a major Reclamation Project and forms the northern boundary of the Fort Belknap Indian Reservation. The water rights issues between the Fort Belknap Reservation and other Milk River water users are more complex than those associated with the Rocky Boy's Reservation and are several years from settlement. Had the Chippewa Cree agreed to the purchase of land on the Milk River, they would have bought themselves, as part of their water rights settlement, a major water dispute.

Importantly, settlements achieved in states where water has a high dollar value(160) have misled mis·led  
v.
Past tense and past participle of mislead.
 tribes into believing that water rights settlements can answer more needs than possible given federal budget constraints A Budget Constraint represents the combinations of goods and services that a consumer can purchase given current prices and his income. Consumer theory uses the concepts of a budget constraint and a preference ordering to analyze consumer choices. . In Montana, water has very limited value as a commodity. For example, the refusal of irrigators to renew contracts from Lower Beaver Creek Reservoir that made water available for purchase by the State, was due to the "high" cost of $10.50 per acre-foot.(161) The Tribal water right from on-Reservation sources marketed at this rate would bring in $105,000 per year, or roughly $35 per capita [Latin, By the heads or polls.] A term used in the Descent and Distribution of the estate of one who dies without a will. It means to share and share alike according to the number of individuals. . Tribes in Montana, faced with the reality of a limited market, turn to the federal government with the hope of a settlement equivalent to those reached in areas with high value water. The federal government allocates funds between the many tribes. Problems with the federal Criteria and Procedures aside, it is not likely, under the agenda of a balanced budget Balanced budget

A budget in which the income equals expenditure. See: budget.


balanced budget

A budget in which the expenditures incurred during a given period are matched by revenues.
, that the expectations of tribes will be realized. Nevertheless, the limited funds available could be allocated in a more equitable manner if need, rather than resource wealth, drove the analysis.

VII.

CONCLUSION

Negotiation of the water rights settlement between the State of Montana and the Chippewa Cree Tribe of the Rocky Boy's Reservation brought ranchers and Tribal members to agreement despite generations of mistrust. Yet the United States, as trustee for the Tribe, was unwilling to participate through portions of the process and unable, until October 1997, to accept the final agreement. Why?

Partial answers can be found in the rigid application of the Criteria and Procedures by the Department of the Interior, in the inequity of placing greater value on settlement with Tribes who have more to begin with, in the reality of low value water in areas of limited population, and the reality of limited federal funds. But to truly understand the problem and offer constructive ideas for change, one must contrast the ranch-by-ranch, drainage-by-drainage process employed by the Commission and the Tribe and the policy or national level decision making of the Department of the Interior. It is the difference between solving problems at the level of community rather than government. The common ground between two ranchers, one Tribal, one non-Tribal, trying to make a living on the same water-short drainage, in a climate with winter temperatures dipping to minus forty degrees Fahrenheit, with children on the same high school basketball team, will generally exceed that between a Tribal Council person and a State or Federal employees who work at the policy level. Local ranchers will also have a better understanding of water supply and water use on that drainage. Finally, the tribal rancher will best understand the differences between the non-Indian and Tribal cultures, because he or she must function in both cultures.

By working at the community level, discussions focused on underlying concerns and interests rather than legal principles. Commission staff, the Tribe, and ranchers were able to design solutions to protect water quality, and improve efficiencies and use of storage, without reducing the 10,000 acre-foot quantification sought by the Tribe. In response to an objection to the proposed Tribal water right, a focus on underlying concerns identified water quality impacts and the timing of water use as the real issues. The actual amount of water sought by the Tribe became a secondary issue. The process of addressing underlying concerns resulted in a high level of local support when the Compact was presented to the legislature for ratification.(162)

Resolution of disputes at the community level places design of solutions in the hands of those who best understand the details of water use and supply on a drainage. It brings to the table Tribal and non-Tribal individuals who face common problems and must live with the solutions to those problems. Finding solutions to water shortage in improved efficiency and coordinated use of storage was only possible because time was devoted to working stream-by-stream and ranch-by-ranch. Ultimately, the answers lay in the solutions suggested by those who live with the water supply problems on a daily basis.

Re-vamping substantive policy toward Indian water rights settlements is necessary, but insufficient. A fundamental change in process and shift in the locus of decision making needs to occur. Natural resource issues are complex and site specific, with all the variables in the natural, sociological and political worlds at play. Only by focusing our dialogue at the watershed level can we find the unique solutions possible in each particular place. This can be done by shifting the power to design solutions to those who must live with them every day. A clear policy in favor of site specific solutions should diminish the federal concern that a solution in one area may set precedent with inappropriate consequences in another area.

The United States can only truly fulfill its role as trustee by empowering Tribes to seek their own solutions. Only by focusing our discussion of water related issues on the watershed as a whole, rather than limiting our view due to artificial political boundaries, can we find solutions that meet the needs of all interested parties. Only by recognizing that Tribal members, even though governed by a separate sovereign, also participate at the level of the community in which they live, a community that generally crosses the Reservation boundary, can we find common ground.

(1.) Act Providing for the Opening of the Fort Assinniboire Military Reservation, Pub. L. No. 261, 39 State. 739 (1916).

(2.) MSE-HKM Engineering, Municipal, Rural and Industrial Water Supply System Needs Assessment, Rocky Boy's Indian Reservation 21-26 (prepared for Bureau of Reclamation) (Jan. 1996) (manuscript on file with Author) [hereinafter here·in·af·ter  
adv.
In a following part of this document, statement, or book.


hereinafter
Adverb

Formal or law from this point on in this document, matter, or case

Adv. 1.
 "Municipal, Rural and Industrial Water Supply System"].

(3.) Id. at 27-28. Unemployment rate obtained from a personal communication with Jim D. Morsette of the Tribal Office.

(4.) Compact with the Chippewa Cree Tribe of the Rocky Boy's Reservation: Montana Reserved Water Rights Compact Commission (1997) (unpublished paper) (manuscript on file with author)[hereinafter "Commission Staff Technical Report"].

(5.) Throughout this document the term "off-Reservation" will be used rather than "non-Indian," to refer to water users and other interest groups outside the Reservation boundaries. Off-Reservation water users in Montana often include Native Americans: In fact, one of the senior off-Reservation water users who sought protection of his state-based water right in the Rocky Boy's negotiations is a member of the Chippewa Cree Tribe and was recently elected to Tribal chair.

(6.) S. 337, 55th Legis. Sess. (Mont. 1997).

(7.) Letter from James Pipkin, Counselor to the Secretary of the Interior, to Senator Lorents Grosfield, Chairman of the Montana Senate Natural Resources Committee (Feb. 14, 1997) (on file with author).

(8.) See, e.g., Senate OKs Chippewa-Cree Water Pact, GREAT FALLS TRIBUNE The Great Falls Tribune is a daily morning newspaper printed in Great Falls, Montana. Its Sunday circulation is 36,763, with 33,434 on weekdays. The Great Falls Tribune won the Pulitzer Prize for explanatory journalism in 2000 for a yearlong series on alcoholism. , Feb. 25, 1997, at 1B.

(9.) Discussions of concerns with the federal process are a yearly topic at the Indian Water Rights Settlement Conference sponsored by the Western States Water Council and the Native American Rights In the United States, persons of Native American descent occupy a unique legal position. On the one hand, they are U.S. citizens and are entitled to the same legal rights and protections under the Constitution that all other U.S. citizens enjoy.  Fund. The Criteria and Procedures for Negotiation of Water Rights Settlements set forth in 55 Fed. Reg. 9,223 (1990), were promulgated prom·ul·gate  
tr.v. prom·ul·gat·ed, prom·ul·gat·ing, prom·ul·gates
1. To make known (a decree, for example) by public declaration; announce officially. See Synonyms at announce.

2.
 by Interior under the Bush administration and are still followed under the Clinton administration.

(10.) As this paper goes to press, new leadership in the Interior Office on Indian Water Rights Settlements has broken this stalemate stale·mate  
n.
1. A situation in which further action is blocked; a deadlock.

2. A drawing position in chess in which the king, although not in check, can move only into check and no other piece can move.

tr.v.
 and federal legislation ratifying the Compact and authorizing $50 million in appropriations has been agreed to by all three parties. The Montana delegation plans to introduce the bill to Congress this year. Nevertheless, the federal process under the Criteria and Procedures remains in place and stands as a barrier to Tribes and off-Reservation water users who seek to manage and share their scarce water resources.

(11.) California Oregon Power Co. v. Beaver beaver, either of two large aquatic rodents, Castor fiber and Castor canadensis, known for their engineering feats. They were once widespread in N and central Eurasia except E Siberia, and in North America from the arctic tree line to the S United  Portland Cement portland cement

Binding agent of present-day concrete. It is a finely ground powder made by burning and grinding a limestone mixed with clay or shale. Its inventor, Joseph Aspdin (1799–1855), patented the process in 1824, naming the material for its resemblance to the
 Co., 295 U.S. 142, 158 (1935) (holding that the effect of the 1866 Mining Act as amended in 1870, the 1877 Desert Lands Act, and the 1891 Act governing right-of-way for canals and reservoirs for public lands and reservations, was to sever TO SEVER, practice. When defendants who are sued jointly have separate defences, they may in general sever, that is, each one rely on his own separate defence; each may plead severally and insist on his own separate plea. See Severance.  the water right from the public land leaving it available for appropriation under local law.) See also, United States v. Rio Grande Rio Grande, city, Brazil
Rio Grande (rē` grän`dĭ), city (1991 pop.
 Irrigation Col, 174 U.S. 690, 706 (1899) (stating with respect to the same Acts that "the obvious purpose of Congress was to give its assent An intentional approval of known facts that are offered by another for acceptance; agreement; consent.

Express assent is manifest confirmation of a position for approval.
, so far as the public lands were concerned, to any system, although in contravention A term of French law meaning an act violative of a law, a treaty, or an agreement made between parties; a breach of law punishable by a fine of fifteen francs or less and by an imprisonment of three days or less. In the U.S.  to the common law rule [of riparian rights riparian rights: see water rights. ], which permitted the appropriation of those waters for legitimate industries."); Cf. Federal Power Comm See comms. . v. Oregon, 349 U.S. 435, 448 (1955) (Pelton Dam case) (held that the same Acts do not apply to reserved land, only to public land defined as land subject to private appropriation and disposal under public land laws.)

(12.) Winters v. United States, 207 U.S. 564, 577 (1908).

(13.) Id. at 576.

(14.) Arizona v. San Carlos Apache Noun 1. San Carlos Apache - an Apache language
Apache - the language of the Apache
 Tribe, 463 U.S. 545, 571 (1983); Cappaert v. United States, 426 U.S. 128, 145 (1976); Colorado River Water Conservation Dist. v. United States, 424 U.S. 800, 813 (1976); United States v. District Court for Eagle County, 401 U.S. 520, 526 (1971).

(15.) "To identify the purposes for which the Colville Reservation was created, we consider the document and circumstances surrounding its creation, and the history of the Indians for whom it was created. We also consider their need to maintain themselves under changed circumstances." Colville Confederated Tribes v. Walton, 647 F.2d 42, 47 (9th Cir. 1981).

(16.) United States v. New Mexico New Mexico, state in the SW United States. At its northwestern corner are the so-called Four Corners, where Colorado, New Mexico, Arizona, and Utah meet at right angles; New Mexico is also bordered by Oklahoma (NE), Texas (E, S), and Mexico (S). , 438 U.S. 696, 700 (1978); Cappaert, 426 U.S. at 141; Winters, 207 U.S. at 576.

(17.) See, e.g., Arizona v. California Arizona v. California may refer to one of several United States Supreme Court cases:
  • Arizona v. California, 283 US 423 (1931)
  • Arizona v. California, 292 US 341 (1934)
  • Arizona v. California, 298 US 558 (1936)
  • Arizona v. California, 373 US 546 (1963)
  • Arizona v.
, 373 U.S. 546, 600 (1963) (accepting the conclusion of the Special Master that quantification of the water necessary to irrigate the practicably irrigable acreage on the Reservations is an appropriate method to determine the water necessary for present and future needs); Winters, 207 U.S. at 576 (holding that the Fort Belknap treaty of May 1, 1888, was intended to change the habits of the Tribes into "pastoral and civilized civ·i·lized  
adj.
1. Having a highly developed society and culture.

2. Showing evidence of moral and intellectual advancement; humane, ethical, and reasonable:
 people," and thus, reserving water for that purpose). See also, United States v. Adair, 723 F.2d 1394, 1410 (9th Cir. 1984) (finding that the continuation of traditional hunting and fishing was a primary purpose of the Reservation and that water was reserved for this purpose); Walton, 647 F.2d at 48 (finding that one purpose of the Reservation was to preserve and replace fishing grounds).

(18.) In re the General Adjudication of all Rights to Use of Water in the Big Horn Big Horn is a tall peak in the Cascade Range in Washington, USA. At 2438+ meters (8,000 feet) in elevation, it is the highest point in Lewis County, Washington.[1] Big Horn, one of the Goat Rocks, is the second highest point on the ridge west of Mt.  River System, 753 P.2d 76, 94-97 (Wyo. 1988) (rejecting the finding of the Special Master that treaty language stating "[t]he Indians herein named agree ... they will make said reservations their permanent home," indicated that a primary purpose of the Reservation was to provide a permanent homeland).

(19.) Walton, 647 F.2d at 47-48 (holding that "one purpose for creating this reservation was to provide a homeland for the Indians to maintain their agrarian society" and then concluding that the amount of water necessary to irrigate all practicably irrigable acreage is the appropriate measure of water for that purpose).

(20.) Arizona, 373 U.S. at 595.

(21.) Id. at 600-601. The relevant discussion occurs in the Report of the Special Master to the United States Supreme Court, Dec. 5, 1960, at 262.

(22.) Wyoming v. United States, 492 U.S. 406, 407 (1989). Interestingly, on the opening of Justice Marshall's papers to the public by the Library of Congress, a draft majority opinion written by Justice O'Connor was discovered. Although the draft opinion accepted the PIA standard for the quantification of reserved water rights for agricultural reservations, Justice O'Connor would have required the addition of a new step in the analysis for those lands that have not been historically irrigated: a determination "of the reasonable likelihood that future irrigation projects, necessary to enable lands which have never been irrigated to obtain water, will actually be built." The analysis suggested by Justice O'Connor would include an assessment of the likelihood of funding for new irrigation, the needs of the particular reservation, and the existence of a market for the products of the new irrigation. Wyoming v. United States, U.S. Supreme Court Second Draft Opinion No. 88-309, at 17-18, Justice O. Connor, June 1989 (available in the Manuscript Division of the Library of Congress, papers of Justice Marshall Justice Marshall:
  • Could refer to John Marshall, Chief Justice of the United States Supreme Court
  • Could refer to Thurgood Marshall, Associate Justice of the United States Supreme Court
). The draft dissenting opinion dissenting opinion n. (See: dissent)  argued strongly that the willingness of the Government to fund a particular program should not be the measure of a reserved water right. Wyoming v. United States, U.S. Supreme Court Second Draft Opinion No. 88-309, dissenting opinion of Justice Brennan Justice Brennan could refer to:
  • William J. Brennan, Jr., former Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States
  • Gerard Brennan, former Chief Justice of Australia, current Justice of the Court of Final Appeal of Hong Kong
.

(23.) Justice O'Connor raised the issue in the unpublished draft opinion in Wyoming v. United States, stating:
   The PIA standard is not without defects. It is necessarily tied to the
   character of the land, and not to the current needs of the Indians living
   on reservations. For example, an agricultural reservation that has only a
   small amount of irrigable land may be awarded very limited reserved water
   rights even if it has a large population.


Wyoming v. United States, U.S. Supreme Court Second Draft Opinion No. 88-309 at 11. However, the question posed in Wyoming was whether the quantification was too large and thus exceeded the Tribes' reasonable needs, not whether the PIA quantification was insufficient. Thus, Justice O'Connor did not develop the analysis of the treatment of a resource poor Reservation.

(24.) MONT. CODE ANN. [sections] 85-2-401(1) (1995); Mettler v. Ames Realty realty n. a short form of "real estate." (See: real estate)


REALTY. An abstract of real, as distinguished from personalty. Realty relates to lands and tenements, rents or other hereditaments. Vide Real Property.
 Co., 61 Mont. 152, 160 (1921).

(25.) MONT. CODE ANN. [sections] 85-2-301 (1) (1995).

(26.) MONT. CODE ANN. [subsections] 85-2-401 and 406(1) (1995).

(27.) See, e.g., Mont. Code Ann. [sections] 85-2-406 (1995) (providing for district court supervision of water distribution on petition by a water user).

(28.) Arizona v. San Carlos Apache Tribe, 463 U.S. 545, 571 (1983); Cappaert, 426 U.S. at 145; Colorado River Water Conservation Dist., 424 U.S. 800, 813 (1976); United States v. District Court for Eagle County, 401 U.S. 520, 526 (1971).

(29.) United States v. Jesse, 744 P.2d 491, 494 (Colo. 1987) (citing The National Water Commission, Water Policies for the Future: Final Report to the President and to the Congress, 464 (1973)). Note, however, that "the right is not lost by nonuse" is stated in the 9th Circuit opinion, Colville Confederated Tribes v. Walton, 647 F.2d 42, 51 (9th Cir. 1981). This issue has not been addressed by the U.S. Supreme Court.

(30.) Coffin v. Left Hand Ditch Co., 6 Colo. 443, 446-447 (1882); Irwin v. Phillips, 5 Cal. 140, 146 (1855).

(31.) Irwin, 5 Cal. at 146.

(32.) Coffin, 6 Colo. at 446; Irwin, 5 Cal. at 146.

(33.) Arizona v. California, 373 U.S. 546, 600-601 (1963) (adopting the solution of the Special Master to quantification of water reserved for present and future agricultural purposes -- i.e. the quantity that is necessary for all practicably irrigable acreage on the reservation); Conrad Inv. Co. v. United States, 161 F. 829, 832 (9th Cir. 1908) (holding that the water reserved by treaty for the Blackfeet Reservation is for both present and future needs).

(34.) See, e.g., Arizona, 373 U.S. at 546.

(35.) U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, ECONOMIC AND STATISTICS ADMINISTRATION, BUREAU OF THE CENSUS Noun 1. Bureau of the Census - the bureau of the Commerce Department responsible for taking the census; provides demographic information and analyses about the population of the United States
Census Bureau
, STATISTICAL ABSTRACT OF THE UNITED STATES The Statistical Abstract of the United States is a publication of the United States Census Bureau, an agency of the United States Department of Commerce. Published annually since 1878, the statistics describe social and economic conditions in the United States.  1993 219, tbl. 358 (113th ed., 1993).

(36.) MONT. CODE ANN. [sections] 3-7-102, (1997) identifies four water divisions in the State. Within those four divisions, the Montana Water Court recognizes eighty-five sub-basins for purposes of adjudication.

(37.) Based on claims filed with the Montana Water Court for purposes of the state-wide general stream adjudication.

(38.) Thus, the U.S. Supreme Court in United States v. Mitchell, 445 U.S. 535,538 (1980), stated that:
   [I]t is elementary that `[t]he United States, as sovereign, is immune from
   suit save as it consents to be sued.... and the terms of its consent to be
   sued in any court define that court's jurisdiction to entertain suit.'
   United States v. Sherwood, 312 U.S. 584, 586 (1941). A waiver of sovereign
   immunity `cannot be implied but must be unequivocally expressed.' United
   States v. King, 395 U.S. 1, 4 (1969).


(39.) 66 Stat. 560, [subsections] 208(a)-(c) (1952).

(40.) 43 U.S.C. [sections] 666(a)(1994). The relevant text of the McCarran Amendment states that:
   Consent is given to join the United States as a defendant in any suit (1)
   for the adjudication of rights to the use of water of a river system or
   other source, or (2) for the administration of such rights, where it
   appears that the United States is the owner of or is in the process of
   acquiring water rights by appropriation under State law, by purchase, by
   exchange, or otherwise, and the United States is a necessary party to such
   suit. The United States, when a party to any such suit, shall (1) be deemed
   to have waived any right to plead that the State laws are inapplicable or
   that the United states is not amenable thereto by reason of its
   sovereignty, and (2) shall be subject to the judgments, orders, and decrees
   of the court having jurisdiction....


Id.

(41.) Although a tribe may voluntarily intervene in a state adjudication, McCarran does not waive To intentionally or voluntarily relinquish a known right or engage in conduct warranting an inference that a right has been surrendered.

For example, an individual is said to waive the right to bring a tort action when he or she renounces the remedy provided by law for such
 the immunity of tribes.

(42.) United States v. District Court for Eagle Co., 401 U.S. 520, 524 (1971).

(43.) Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United States Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United States, 424 U.S. 800 (1976)[1], was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States created a new doctrine of abstention, in order to prevent duplicative litigation between state and federal , 424 U.S. 800, 819 (1976).

(44.) Dugan v. Rank, 372 U.S. 609, 618 (1963) (quoting S. Rep. No. 755, 82d. Cong., 1st Sess., at 9 (1951)).

(45.) See generally Mont. Code Ann. 85-2 (1995).

(46.) Mont. Code Ann. [subsections] 85-2-211 to 243 (1995).

(47.) Mont. Code Ann. [subsections] 85-2-701 to 705 and [sections] 85-2-228 (1995).

(48.) Mont. Code Ann. [sections] 85-2-301 (1995).

(49.) Mont. Code Ann. [sections] 85-2-313 (1995).

(50.) Id.

(51.) United States v. Adsit, filed by the United States and consolidated with Northern Cheyenne v. Tongue River Tongue River  

A river, about 396 km (246 mi) long, rising in northern Wyoming and flowing generally northeast to the Yellowstone River in southeast Montana.
 Water Users Assn., filed by the Tribe, CV-75-20BLG BLG Bulk Liquids and Gases
BLG Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
BLG Boys Like Girls (band)
BLG Bremer Lagerhaus-Gesellschaft AG (Bremen, Germany)
BLG Betalactoglobulin
 (Dist. Ct. Mont.), asserting the claims of the Northern Cheyenne Tribe of the Northern Cheyenne Reservation on the Tongue River and the Crow Tribe of the Crow Reservation on Rosebud Creek, dismissed Nov. 29, 1979; United States v. Big Horn Low Line Canal, CV-75-34BLG (Dist. Ct. Mont.), asserting the claims of the Crow Tribe of the Crow Reservation on the Tongue, Big Horn and Little Bighorn Little Bighorn, river, c.90 mi (145 km) long, rising in the Bighorn Mts., N Wyo., and flowing north to join the Bighorn River in S Mont. On June 25–26, 1876, Sioux and Cheyenne warriors defeated the forces of Col. George Custer in the Little Bighorn valley.  Rivers and on Pryor, Sage, Tullock and Sarpy Creeks, dismissed Nov. 29, 1979; United States v. Aageson, CV-79-21-GF (Dist. Ct. Mont.), asserting the claims of the Blackfeet Tribe of the Blackfeet Reservation, the Chippewa Cree Tribe of the Rocky Boy's Reservation, the Sioux and Assiniboine Tribes of the Fort Peck Reservation and the Gros Ventre and Assiniboine Tribes of the Fort Belknap Reservation in the Milk and St. Marys River
This article is about the river in Oregon. For the river in Illinois, see Marys River (Illinois)
Marys River (formerly Mary's River, and sometimes still spelled this way) is a tributary of the Willamette River in western Oregon, starting near
 basins, filed 4-5-79, dismissed Nov. 29, 1979; United States v. Aasheim, CV-79-40BLG (Dist Ct. Mont.), asserting the claims of the Sioux and Assiniboine Tribes of the Fort Peck Reservation on Poplar Poplar, city, England
Poplar, former metropolitan borough, SE England. See Tower Hamlets.
poplar, in botany
poplar: see willow.
, Muddy, Wolf, Little Wolf Little Wolf is a fairly common name among American Indians. More than one Cheyenne chief bore the name, an early example being a Southern Cheyenne chief who participated in a famous horse-stealing raid (c. 1830) on the Comanches with Yellow Wolf.  and Tule tu·le  
n.
1. Any of several bulrushes of the genus Scirpus, growing in marshy lowlands of the southwest United States.

2. tu·les Northern California Marshy or swampy land.
 Creeks, dismissed Nov. 29, 1979; United States v. AMS AMS - Andrew Message System  Ranch, CV-79-22GF (Dist. Ct. Mont.); Asserting the claims of the Blackfeet Tribe of the Blackfeet Reservation on the Marias River, dismissed Nov. 29, 1979; United States v. Abell, CV-79-33M (Dist. Ct. Mont.), asserting the claims of the Salish and Kootenai Tribes of the Flathead Reservation on the Flathead River Flathead River

River, southeastern British Columbia, Canada, and western Montana, U.S. Rising in the MacDonald Range, it flows south for 240 mi (385 km) across the Canada-U.S. boundary into Montana.
, dismissed Nov. 29, 1979; dismissals upheld in Arizona v. San Carlos Apache Tribe, 463 U.S. 545 (1983).

(52.) Northern Cheyenne v. Tongue River Water Users, 484 F.Supp. 31 (D.C. Mont. 1979) (dismissing the federal suit) rev'd sub nom. Northern Cheyenne v. Adsit, 668 F.2d 1080, 1082 (9th Cir. 1982).

(53.) Arizona v. San Carlos Apache Tribe, 463 U.S. 545 (1983).

(54.) Id. at 570.

(55.) Montana v. Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes, 712 P.2d 754, 768 (Mont. 1985).

(56.) Id.

(57.) Mont. Code Ann. [sections] 2-15-213(1)(1995).

The Commission consists of:
   (a) two members of the house of representatives appointed by the speaker,
   each from a different political party;

   (b) two members of the senate appointed by the president, each from a
   different political party;

   (c) four members designated by the governor; and

   (d) one member designated by the attorney general.


MONT. CODE ANN. [sections] 2-15-213(2) (1995).

(58.) MONT. CODE ANN. [subsections] 85-2-701(2) and 702 (1995).

(59.) MONT. CODE ANN. [sections] 85-2-703 (1995).

(60.) See MONT. CODE ANN. [sections] 2-15-212 (1995) (indicating that "the commission is acting on behalf of the governor").

(61.) This policy has been articulated by Montana Governor Racicot in numerous oral presentations.

(62.) MONT. CODE ANN. [sections] 85-2-702(2) (1995).

(63.) MONT. CODE ANN. [sections] 85-2-702(3) (1995).

(64.) MONT. CODE ANN. [sections] 85-2-233(6) (1995).

(65.) MONT. CODE ANN. [subsections] 85-2-234(2) & 85-2-702(3) (1995).

(66.) See e.g., MONT. CODE ANN. [sections] 85-20-301 (1995) ("Northern Cheyenne-Montana Compact"); Settlement Act, Pub. L. No. 102-374, 106 Stat. 1186 (1992); Fort Hall Indian Water Rights Act, Pub. L. No. 101-602, 104 Stat. 3059 (1990); Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community Water Rights Settlement Act, Pub. L. No. 100-512, 102 Stat. 2549 (1988).

(67.) See, e.g., MONT. CODE ANN. [sections] 85-20-401 (1995) ("National Park Service - Montana Compact").

(68.) Extensive research on the history of the Chippewa Cree in Montana by the Commission staff historian, Joan Specking, is the source for most of the information summarized under "The Land Base" (manuscript on file with the author).

(69.) Treaty with the Blackfoot Indians, 11 Stat. 657 (1855).

(70.) Id. at 662

(71.) Floyd Sharrock & Susan R. Sharrock, History of the Cree Indian Territorial Expansion from the Hudson Bay Hudson Bay, inland sea of North America, c.475,000 sq mi (1,230,000 sq km), c.850 mi (1,370 km) long and c.650 mi (1,050 km) wide, E central Canada. Hudson Bay and James Bay (its southern extension) and all their islands border Nunavut Territory, Manitoba, Ontario,  Area to the Interior Saskatchewan and Missouri Plains, in AMERICAN INDIAN American Indian
 or Native American or Amerindian or indigenous American

Any member of the various aboriginal peoples of the Western Hemisphere, with the exception of the Eskimos (Inuit) and the Aleuts.
 ETHNOHISTORY eth·no·his·to·ry  
n.
The study of especially native or non-Western peoples from a combined historical and anthropological viewpoint, using written documents, oral literature, material culture, and ethnographic data.
: NORTH CENTRAL AND NORTHEASTERN INDIANS 307 (1974).

(72.) Act to Establish a Reservation for Certain Indians in the Territory of Montana, 18 (part III) Stat. 28 (1874).

(73.) The boundaries of the Fort were established by Executive Order on March 4, 1880 and were found defective and reprinted on June 28, 1881. General Orders and Circulars, 1876-1881, Dept. of Dakota, Vol. 208, General Field Order No. 8, June 28, 1881, RG 94, Adjunctant General Field Office, National Archives National Archives, official depository for records of the U.S. federal government, established in 1934 by an act of Congress. Although displeasure concerning the method of keeping national records was voiced in Congress as early as 1810, the United States continued , Washington D.C.

(74.) Act to Ratify ratify v. to confirm and adopt the act of another even though it was not approved beforehand. Example: An employee for Holsinger's Hardware orders carpentry equipment from Phillips Screws and Nails although the employee was not authorized to buy anything.  and Confirm on Agreement with the Gros Ventre, Piegen, Blood, Blackfeet, and River Crow Indians in Montana, 25 Stat. 113 (1888).

(75.) Id.

(76.) Executive Order of May 2, 1888, reduced the reservation to 704,000 acres. Executive Order of September 25, 1888. Executive Order of October 9, 1891, turned certain areas over to the Secretary of the Interior for disposal, leaving approximately 220,000 acres. The military reservation was authorized for further reduction by Act of April 18, 1896, 29 Stat. 95 (1896).

(77.) Act Authorizing Secretary of the Interior to Survey the Lands of the Abandoned Fort Assinniboine
For the fort in Alberta, Canada, see Fort Assiniboine.


Fort Assinniboine, a fort in the U.S. state of Montana, was built in 1879, in the aftermath of the Black Hills War and the disastrous defeat of U.S.
 Military Reservation, Pub. L. No. 244, 38 Stat. 807 (1915).

(78.) Id.

(79.) Act Providing for the Opening of the Fort Assinniboire Military Reservation, Pub. L. No. 261, 39 Stat. 739 (1916).

(80.) General Orders and Circulars, No. 85 Headquarters of the Army, October 22, 1981.

(81.) Act to Add Certain Public Domain Land in Montana to the Rocky Boy Indian Reservation The Rocky Boy Indian Reservation is an Indian reservation of the Chippewa-Cree tribe located in the U.S. state of Montana. The smallest reservation in the state, it was created in 1916 and is located in Hill County and Chouteau County in northern Montana about , Pub. L. No. 55, 49 Stat. 217, 218 (1935).

(82.) S. Rep. 308 (1935) (quoting letter to the Chairman of the Committee on Indian Affairs from the Secretary of the Interior).

(83.) Act to Conserve and Develop Indian Lands, Pub. L. No. 583, 48 Stat. 984 (1934).

(84.) Rocky Boy's Preliminary Project Plan for Land Acquisitions Under the Indian Reorganization Act (1938) (available at the National Archives, Pacific NW Region, Fort Belknap Indian Agency, Land Acquisitions Project Files, 1937-47, Box 396). The actual outlines of the maximum purchase area were not articulated until 1939 in a report accompanying an Act of Congress. See infra [Latin, Below, under, beneath, underneath.] A term employed in legal writing to indicate that the matter designated will appear beneath or in the pages following the reference.


infra prep.
 note However, it appears that the area arose from the recommendations of a group of federal officials who met in Great Falls Great Falls, city (1990 pop. 55,097), seat of Cascade co., N central Mont., second largest city in the state, at the confluence of the Missouri and Sun rivers and near the falls that give the city its name; inc. 1888.  in 1936 to discuss the needs of Montana's landless Indians. See Letter from Superintendent Wooldridge to the Commissioner of Indian Affairs, (Dec. 10, 1936).

(85.) S. REP. No. 105, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. (1939). This area was not added to the Reservation until November 26, 1947, when the Assistant Secretary of the Interior signed the proclamation An act that formally declares to the general public that the government has acted in a particular way. A written or printed document issued by a superior government executive, such as the president or governor, which sets out such a declaration by the government.  transferring the land in response to an agreement with the Chippewa Cree Tribe to enroll more landless Indians.

(86.) Rocky Boy's Preliminary Project Plan, supra A relational DBMS from Cincom Systems, Inc., Cincinnati, OH (www.cincom.com) that runs on IBM mainframes and VAXs. It includes a query language and a program that automates the database design process.  note 82.

(87.) Id.

(88.) Act to Add Certain Public Domain Land in Montana to the Rocky Boy Indian Reservation, Pub. L. No. 13, 53 Stat. 552 (1939). The maximum purchase

area referred to in this Act appears to encompass the same area identified for purchase in 1938. However, because the purchase area boundary was first referred to by Congress in this Act, it is often referred to as the "1939 Boundary." Although never recognized by Congress as anything more than a purchase area boundary, the Tribal Constitution, approved by the Secretary of the Interior, designates this boundary as the "Reservation Boundary." Considerable private land remains within this boundary. This difference in perception caused considerable concern among area ranchers and led to significant delays in negotiations.

(89.) S. REP. No. 105, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. (1939).

(90.) Id.

(91.) Letter from Assistant Commissioner of Indian Affairs, William Smith William Smith may refer to: People
  • William Smith (c. 1872–1941), Master of the SS Sauternes, English merchant seaman killed in World War II
  • William Smyth (1460–1514), English Bishop of Lincoln
  • William Smith (actor) (born 1934)
, to Sherman Smith Sherman Smith (born November 1, 1954 in Youngstown, Ohio) is a former professional American football player who played running back for eight seasons for the Seattle Seahawks and San Diego Chargers. , representative of Montana's homeless Indians (April 13, 1940).

(92.) See Addition of Certain Lands to Rocky Boy's Indian Reservation, Montana, Fed. Reg. Doc. 43-2629, Proclamation of the Assistant Secretary of the Interior, November 26, 1947, adding the land to the Reservation. See also Letter from Sherman Smith, representative of Montana homeless Indians, to Senator Wheeler (Mar. 22, (1940) (seeking aid in enjoining en·join  
tr.v. en·joined, en·join·ing, en·joins
1. To direct or impose with authority and emphasis.

2. To prohibit or forbid. See Synonyms at forbid.
 transfer of purchased land to the Reservation); Letter from the Chippewa Cree Tribe of Rocky Boy's to the Commissioner of Indian Affairs (January 30, 1946) (on file with author) (stating that the Tribe had adopted 25 additional families as requested).

(93.) Act to Designate des·ig·nate  
tr.v. des·ig·nat·ed, des·ig·nat·ing, des·ig·nates
1. To indicate or specify; point out.

2. To give a name or title to; characterize.

3.
 the Beneficiary of the Equitable Title to Land Purchased by the United States and Added to the Rocky Boy's Indian Reservation, Pub. L. No. 85-773, 72 Stat. 931, (1958).

(94.) Pub. L. No. 93-285, 88 Stat. 142 (1974).

(95.) Supra note 4.

(96.) Frank Swenson, Geology and Ground-Water Resources of the Lower Marias Irrigation Project Montana, USGS USGS United States Geological Survey (US Department of the Interior)  WATER SUPPLY PAPER 1460-B (1957).

(97.) Municipal, Rural and Industrial Water Supply System, supra note 2, at 11.

(98.) Commission Staff Technical Report, supra note 4.

(99.) Id.

(100.) Id.

(101.) FED. R. EVID. 408 and MONT. R. EVID. 408 (1997) state that:
   Evidence of (1) furnishing or offering or promising to furnish, or (2)
   accepting or offering or promising to accept, a valuable consideration in
   compromising or attempting to compromise a claim which was disputed as to
   either validity or amount is not admissible to prove liability for or
   invalidity of the claim or its amount. Evidence of conduct or statements
   made in compromise negotiations is likewise not admissible. This rule does
   not require exclusion of any evidence otherwise discoverable merely because
   it is presented in the course of compromise negotiations. This rule also
   does not require exclusion when the evidence is offered for another
   purpose, such as proving bias or prejudice of a witness, negativing a
   contention of undue delay, or proving an effort to obstruct a criminal
   investigation or prosecution.


(102.) MONT. CODE ANN. [sections] 2-3-203(1) (1997).
   RIGHT TO KNOW. NO person shall be deprived of the right to examine
   documents or to observe the deliberations of all public bodies or agencies
   of state government and its subdivisions, except in cases in which the
   demand of individual privacy clearly exceeds the merits of public
   disclosure.


MONT. CODE ANN. [sections] 2-3-203(1) (1997).

(103.) It is important to note that the late establishment of the Rocky Boy's Reservation made it possible that the reserved rights would be Considered by a court to be junior to many of the early private Appropriations in the area. Thus, in this particular negotiation, public Support was not only necessary to gain legislative approval, but to ensure That the compact would be acceptable to water users claiming a senior Right. Without that support senior water users might raise a valid objection To the Compact in Water Court.

(104.) The federal legislation includes authorization of $4 million for enlargement of East Fork Reservoir, and $13 million for enlargement of the reservoir on Box Elder Creek.

(105.) Memorandum from the Bureau of Reclamation Project Manager in Billings, Montana, to the Regional Director (Nov. 4, 1993) (copy on file with author). The letter says that 389,695 acre-feet of active storage exists in Lake Elwell, also referred to as Tiber Dam. Only 7,948 acre-feet are allocated by contract for irrigation. By agreement with the Montana Department of Fish, Wildlife and Parks, the Bureau of Reclamation releases water from Lake Elwell to maintain a 500 cfs minimum flow to maintain fisheries on the Marias River. The memorandum indicates that the available water in Lake Elwell is probably between 100,000 and 250,000 acre-feet if the minimum flow is to be maintained. It should also be noted that the Blackfeet Tribe has water rights claims on the Marias River upstream from Lake Elwell, but did not express concerns when the Rocky Boy's Compact was presented to the Montana Legislature. The federal legislation agreed to in February, 1998 by the Tribe the State, and the Departments of the Interior and Justice, includes the 10,000 acre-foot allocation from Lake Elwell.

(106.) See, e.g., Fort Peck - Montana Compact, MONT. CODE ANN. [sections] 85-20-201(1995); Northern Cheyenne - Montana Compact MONT. CODE ANN. [sections] 85-20-301 (1995); But cf., In re Big Horn River System 835 P.2d 273, 279-281 (Wyo. 1992). In a ruling with multiple concurring con·cur  
intr.v. con·curred, con·cur·ring, con·curs
1. To be of the same opinion; agree: concurred on the issue of preventing crime. See Synonyms at assent.

2.
 and dissenting opinions, the Wyoming Supreme Court The Wyoming Supreme Court is the highest court in the U.S. state of Wyoming. The Court consists of a Chief Justice and four Associate Justices. Each Justice is appointed by the Governor of Wyoming for an eight-year term.  agreed with the State of Wyoming that the Tribes do not have the right to change the use of their water right without regard to State law, and that the State Engineer, not the Tribal Water Agency, has authority to administer water on the Reservation. It should be noted that, because the Rocky Boy's Reservation was never allotted al·lot  
tr.v. al·lot·ted, al·lot·ting, al·lots
1. To parcel out; distribute or apportion: allotting land to homesteaders; allot blame.

2.
, the settlement does not address the issue of jurisdiction over non-Indian water rights within Reservation boundaries. Settlement discussions or litigation with the Blackfeet, Crow, and Confederated Salish and Kootenai, will face this issue.

(107.) MONT. CODE ANN. [sections] 85-2-401 (1995).

(108.) Although most Reservations in Montana were created early in the territory's history and, therefore, carry senior rights, the late creation of the Rocky Boy's Reservation renders its priority date both junior to and senior to rights on shared water sources. It should be noted, however, that the Tribe presented a theory on which it would have the senior right. The Tribe argued that it could "tack" its water right to the early right of the military reservation thereby obtaining an 1880 priority date. Although the Commission did not accept the theory because all irrigated land associated with the military reservation was opened to homestead rather than included in the Indian Reservation, and felt it would subject the Compact to a possible valid challenge in Water Court, the uncertainty provided an incentive to both parties to seek a solution that would avoid the issue of priority by protecting both the Tribe's water uses and that of potentially senior water users.

(109.) In times of shortage, downstream irrigators may not object to water use on the Reservation as long as such use is within the Tribe's allocation. New storage on the Reservation allows the Tribe to store water during spring run-off, thus reducing the likelihood of shortage in dry years. This approach was acceptable to down-stream irrigators.

(110.) Although priority is a "guiding principle," the following factors are relevant in an equitable apportionment:
   physical and climatic conditions, the consumptive use of water in the
   several sections of the river, the character and rate of return flows, the
   extent of established uses, the availability of storage water, the
   practical effect of wasteful uses on downstream areas, [and] the damage to
   upstream areas as compared to the benefits to downstream areas if a
   limitation is imposed on the former.


Colorado v. New Mexico, 459 U.S. 180 (1982) (quoting Nebraska v. Wyoming, 325 U.S. 589 (1945)).

(111.) The Court stated that reserved water rights are instead "governed by the statutes and Executive Orders creating the reservation." Arizona v. California, 373 U.S. 546, 597 (1963).

(112.) It is also important to note that, although negotiation provides considerable flexibility, under State law the Water Court may void the Compact if a valid objection is raised. MONT. CODE ANN. [sections] 85-2-233(6) (1995).

(113.) "Carriage loss" means loss during conveyance of water due to evapotranspiration evapotranspiration

Loss of water from the soil both by evaporation from the soil surface and by transpiration from the leaves of the plants growing on it. Factors that affect the rate of evapotranspiration include the amount of solar radiation, atmospheric vapor pressure,
 and seepage.

(114.) Chippewa Cree Tribal Water Rights Settlement Implementation Projects Fund Grant Application, submitted to the Renewable Resource Noun 1. renewable resource - any natural resource (as wood or solar energy) that can be replenished naturally with the passage of time
natural resource, natural resources - resources (actual and potential) supplied by nature
 Grant and Loan Program by the Montana Reserved Water Rights Compact Commission (unpublished, May 1996, copy on file with author). Grant approved in H.R. 6, 55th Legis. Sess. (Mont. 1997) (codified cod·i·fy  
tr.v. cod·i·fied, cod·i·fy·ing, cod·i·fies
1. To reduce to a code: codify laws.

2. To arrange or systematize.
 at MONT. CODE ANN. [sections] 85-20-601 (1997)).

(115.) See Swenson, supra note 96.

(116.) The hydrostatic head Noun 1. hydrostatic head - the pressure at a given point in a liquid measured in terms of the vertical height of a column of the liquid needed to produce the same pressure  from such storage has been known to force salts into the groundwater in a phenomena common in the area and known as saline seep. Scott Brown Scott Brown may refer to:
  • Scott Brown (DJ)
  • Scott Brown (Scottish footballer)
  • Scott Brown (English footballer)
  • Scott Brown (Welsh footballer)
  • Scott P. Brown, a Massachusetts state senator
, Rocky Boy Tribe Proposed Irrigation Impact-Groundwater Study, Montana Salinity Control Salinity control relates to controlling the problem of soil salinity and reclaiming salinized agricultural land.

The aim of soil salinity control is to to prevent soil degradation by salinization and reclaim already salty (saline) soils (see also land reclamation) Soil reclamation
 Association (May 1996) (unpublished paper) (on file with author).

(117.) See, e.g., In re Big Horn River System, 835 P.2d at 279, 281, note 106 (Wyo. 1992).

(118.) States point to the language in the McCarran Amendment "for the administration of such rights," to support their argument. 43 U.S.C. [sections] 666 (1994). The United States and Tribes assert that law is limited by the phrase "where it appears that the United States is the owner of or is in the process of acquiring water rights by appropriation under State law." Id.

(119.) See, e.g., MONT. CODE ANN. [sections] 85-2-406 (1995); Nebraska v. Wyoming, 325 U.S. 589, 655 (1945).

(120.) See supra note 38.

(121.) The Northern Cheyenne Compact ratified by the State legislature included a waiver of sovereign immunity for the State, Tribe, and United States for Compact Board proceedings. MONT. CODE ANN. [sections]85-20-301 (1995). Under pressure from the Department of Justice, the State and Tribe agreed to remove the waiver for the United States from the federal bill ratifying the Compact. Northern Cheyenne Indian Reserved Water Rights Settlement Act of 1992, Pub. Law No. 102-374, 106 Stat. 1186 at 1192 (Sept. 30, 1992).

(122.) Water Rights Compact, Apr. 15, 1997, Mont.-Chippewa Cree Tribe of the Rocky Boy's Reservation, art. IV, sect. D18), MONT. CODE ANN. [sections] 85-20-601 (1997) (providing: "[t]he parties agree that only Congress can waive the immunity of the United States. The participation of the United States in the proceedings of the Compact Board shall be as provided by Congress.").

(123.) The federal bill agreed to in February, 1998 by the State, Tribe, Interior and Justice does not expressly waive the sovereign immunity of the United States. It leaves open the possibility that the McCarran Amendment waiver is broad enough to cover the administration and dispute resolution agreed to in the Compact.

(124.) "Municipal, Rural and Industrial Water Supply System Needs Assessment, Rocky Boy's Indian Reservation." Prepared for the Bureau of Reclamation by MSE-HKM Engineering, January 1996.

(125.) Id.

(126.) Id.

(127.) Commission Staff Technical Report.

(128.) As the area covered by the feasibility study expanded, it grew beyond the focus of the settlement of reserved water rights. The federal bill for ratification of the Compact does not include a regional system. Instead, it includes $1 million for further study of alternatives to import drinking water to the Reservation, including the regional system. A bill seeking authorization for a regional system may be introduced to Congress separately at a later date.

(129.) Montana Rural Water Systems, Inc. helped identify the problems faced by many of the existing systems. MRWS MRWS Managing Radioactive Waste Safely
MRWS Mentally Retarded Welfare Society (Andhra Pradesh, India) 
 is a non-profit affiliate of National Rural Water Systems, Inc., and is "dedicated to safe drinking water for all Montanans." It provides technical and planning assistance to small communities and rural areas for development and maintenance of rural water systems.

(130.) MSE-HKM Engineering, Draft North Central Montana Central Montana is the region of Montana near Great Falls, describing more or less the area east of the main belt of the Rockies west of the Musselshell River, and north from White Sulphur Springs to the Hi-Line.  Regional Water System Needs Assessment 3 (May 19, 1997).

(131.) Id. at Table 2.

(132.) 42 U.S.C. [subsections] 300f to 300j-26.

(133.) Id. at 26.

(134.) Omnibus omnibus: see bus.  Consolidated Rescissions and Appropriations Act of 1996, Pub. Law No. 101-134, H.R. Report 104-537, Title III Title III Program is a U.S. Federal Grant Program to improve education History
The Title III Program began as part of the Higher Education Act of 1965, which sought to provide support to strengthen various aspects of the schools through a formula grant program to accredited,
 - Independent Agencies, Environmental Protection Agency Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), independent agency of the U.S. government, with headquarters in Washington, D.C. It was established in 1970 to reduce and control air and water pollution, noise pollution, and radiation and to ensure the safe handling and  - Environmental Programs and Management (1996).

(135.) H.R. 2, 55th Legis. Sess. (Mont. 1997).

(136.) As of March, 1998, a final draft of the feasibility study had not been completed.

(137.) It should be noted that the inadequacy in water supply at Rocky Boy's is the result of a dry climate and limited drainage area, not non-Indian development.

(138.) Interior has recently reversed this position and recognized the need for imported drinking water. The federal bill includes a statement that imported water is necessary to serve the drinking water needs of the Tribe. In addition, the federal bill will authorize To empower another with the legal right to perform an action.

The Constitution authorizes Congress to regulate interstate commerce.


authorize v. to officially empower someone to act. (See: authority)
 $1 million to look at additional alternatives for supply of drinking water to the Reservation.

(139.) In his statements on signing the "Puyallup Tribe of Indians Settlement Act of 1989," President Bush stated:
   The Administration expects to continue to work toward settlement of
   legitimate Indian land and water rights claims to which the Federal
   Government is a party. ... Indian land and water rights settlements involve
   a complicated blend of law, treaties, court decisions, history, social
   policies, technology, and practicality. These interrelated factors make it
   difficult to formulate hard-and-fast rules to determine ... In recognition
   of this difficulties, this Administration is committed to establishing
   criteria and procedures to guide future Indian land and water claim
   settlement negotiations including provision for Administration
   participation in such negotiations.


George Bush, 1 Pub. Papers 771, 772 (June 21, 1989).

(140.) Id.

(141.) 55 Fed. Reg. 9,223 (1990).

(142.) Id.

(143.) 55 Fed. Reg. 9,224 (1990).

(144.) Written Testimony submitted to the Montana Senate Natural Resources Committee on SB 337, by Chris Tweeten, Chairman, Montana Reserved Water Rights Compact Commission, 1997 Legislative Session.

(145.) Letter from James Pipkin, Counselor to the Secretary of the Interior, to Senator Lorents Grosfield, Chairman Senate Natural Resources Committee, Montana Legislature, of February 14, 1997, and attachments. See also, Supplemental testimony of Chris Tweeten, Chairman of the Montana Reserved Water Rights Compact Commission, submitted to the Senate Natural Resources Committee, Montana Legislature, February 17, 1997, documenting two years of requests from the Chippewa Cree Tribe and the Compact Commission seeking Interior participation in negotiations. The Montana Legislature meets for ninety days once every two years, thus, several weeks of delay in Compact finalization would have postponed approval by the State to 1999.

(146.) As noted above, in February 1998 Interior and Justice agreed to federal legislation ratifying the Compact and appropriating funds for its implementation, including water development on the Reservation.

(147.) 55 Fed. Reg. 9,223 (1990).

(148.) The role of the "trustee" is referred to in the context of federal policy, not the legal interpretations of that role.

(149.) H.R. REP. No. 626, 64th Cong., 1st Sess. (1916) (report on amendment increasing the amount of land to be set aside for the Rocky Boy's Reservation).

(150.) Compare, Fort Peck Compact quantification: 1,050,472 acre feet. MONT. CODE ANN. [sections] 85-20-201 (1995); with Northern Cheyenne Compact quantification: 91,330 acre-feet. Mont. Code Ann. [sections] 85-20-301 (1995); and Fort Hall Settlement quantification: 581,031 acre-feet. Pub. L. No. 101-602, 104 Stat. 3059 (1990).

(151.) The federal bill negotiated in February 1998 to ratify the Compact states that the Reservation water supply is inadequate to fulfill the drinking water needs of the Tribe.

(152.) This proposal remained on the table as of August, 1997, despite strong opposition by the State and the Tribe. Letter from David J David J. Haskins (b. April 24, 1957, in Northampton, England) is a British alternative rock musician. He was the bassist for the seminal gothic rock band Bauhaus. Life and work . Hayes, Counselor to the Secretary of the Interior, to Susan Cottingham and Barbara Cosens of the Reserved Water Rights Compact Commission staff (July 22, 1997). In October, 1997, Interior took this proposal off the table.

(153.) See Municipal, Rural and Industrial Water Supply System, supra note 2.

(154.) Commission Staff Technical Report, supra note 4.

(155.) See, e.g., "Special Message to the Congress on the Problems of the American Indian: `The Forgotten American,'" President Johnson, 1 Pub. Papers 335, 336 (Mar. 6, 1968) (articulating the new goal for Indian Programs: "A goal that erases the old debate about `termination' of Indian programs and stresses self-determination; a goal that erases old attitudes of paternalism and promotes partnership and self-help."). Under President Nixon, the greatest progress in the concept of self-determination was made. In his "Special Message to the Congress on Indian Affairs," Public Papers 213 at 564, July 8, 1970, President Nixon rejected the extremes of termination and paternalism and called for self-determination among Indian people. He rejected termination because it ignores the legal obligation of the federal government to tribes and the harmful effects in the cases in which termination has been tried. (at 565-66) He rejected paternalism because it results in "the erosion of Indian initiative and morale." (at 566).

(156.) Act Appropriating the Receipts from the Sale and Disposal of Public Lands to the Construction of Irrigation Works, Pub. L. No. 161, 32 Stat. 388, ch. 1093 (1902) (codified in scattered sections of 43 U.S.C. [subsections] 371-498 (1994)).

(157.) See, e.g., Ivanhoe Irrigation Dist. v. McCracken, 357 U.S. 275, 292 (1958). Congress intended the Reclamation program to benefit "the largest number of people, consistent, of course, with the public good." See also Peterson v. United States Department of the Interior, 899 F.2d 799, 802-03 (9th Cir. 1990) ("[w]ith the Reclamation Act, Congress created a blueprint blueprint, white-on-blue photographic print, commonly of a working drawing used during building or manufacturing. The plan is first drawn to scale on a special paper or tracing cloth through which light can penetrate.  for the orderly development of the West, and water was the instrument by which the plan would be carried out ..."); United States v. Tulare Lake Tulare Lake, intermittent lake, in the Central Valley, central Calif. The Kings, Kaweah, and Kern rivers at one time flowed into the lake, but their waters have been diverted for irrigation. The land in the lake's basin has a high salt content.  Canal Co., 535 F.2d 1093, 1119 (9th Cir. 1976) (stating that the Act had the following goals: "to create family-sized farms in areas irrigated by federal projects.... to secure the wide distribution of the substantial subsidy involved in reclamation projects and limit private speculative gains resulting from the existence to such projects").

(158.) Reed D. Benson, Whose Water is it? Private Rights and Public Authority Over Reclamation Project Water, 16 VA. ENV ENV Environment
ENV Envelope
ENV Environmental Science
ENV Emissions Neutral Vehicle
ENV École Nationale Vétérinaire (French)
ENV Estimated Net Value
ENV European Norm Voluntary
. L.J. 363 (1997).

(159.) 55 Fed. Reg. 9,223 (1990).

(160.) See, e.g., Salt River Pima - Maricopa Indian Community Water Rights Settlement Act of 1988, Pub. L. No. 100-512, 102 Stat. 2549 (1988) ($58.22 million in federal funding, $126 million in local cost share).

(161.) Personal communication from Hill County Commissioner Kathy Bessette.

(162.) Testimony in support of SB 337 ratifying the Compact included representatives of: Hill County Commissioners, Milk River Irrigation Districts, Bear Paw Resources Alliance, Montana Stock Growers Assoc., Montana Water Users Assoc., and area Legislators.

Barbara A. Cosens, Legal Counsel, Montana Reserved Water Rights Compact Commission. J.D. 1990, University of California, Hastings College of the Law University of California, Hastings College of the Law is a premier, first-tier law school located in downtown San Francisco, California. It was founded in 1878 by Serranus Clinton Hastings, the first Chief Justice of California, as the first law school of the University of . M.S. Geology, 1982, University of Washington. B.S. Geology, 1977, University of California, Davis The University of California, Davis, commonly known as UC Davis, is one of the ten campuses of the University of California, and was established as the University Farm in 1905. . The views expressed are not necessarily those of the Montana Reserved Water Rights Compact Commission. The author would like to acknowledge Gene Etchart, Chris Tweeten and Jack Salmond of the Commission, Susan Cottingham, Bill Greiman, Bob Levitan, Joan Specking, Andy Anderson For other persons named Andy Anderson, see Andy Anderson (disambiguation).
Andy Anderson (birth name Clifford Leon Anderson) is a drummer, notably for the band The Cure. He was born in West Ham, East London, England on January 30, 1951.
, Craig Bacino and Dolores Dolores (or Delores) was a common given name (until the 1960s in the USA); it is cognate with the English word "dolorous" (meaning sorrowful) and equivalent in meaning.  Eustice of the Commission staff, Paul Russette, Jr. and Jim D. Morsette of the Tribal Staff, and Yvonne Knight and Kim Gottschalk of the Native American Rights Fund, attorneys for the Tribe, Bob Larson of the Montana Department of Natural Resources and Conservation, Tom Sheehy of the Bear Paw Resources Alliance, and Kathy Bessette and the Hill County Commissioners for the considerable technical work, creative problem solving Creative problem solving is the mental process of creating a solution to a problem. It is a special form of problem solving in which the solution is independently created rather than learned with assistance. Creative problem solving requires more than just knowledge and thinking.  and patience. It is their efforts which made this historic agreement possible.
COPYRIGHT 1998 University of California at Los Angeles, School of Law
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 1998 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:Cosens, Barbara A.
Publication:UCLA Journal of Environmental Law & Policy
Geographic Code:1U8MT
Date:Dec 22, 1998
Words:17450
Previous Article:The crafting of the National Low-Emission Vehicle program: a private contract theory of public rulemaking.
Next Article:Habitat conservation plans as recovery vehicles: jump-starting the Endangered Species Act.
Topics:



Related Articles
American Indian reserved water rights: the federal obligation to protect tribal water resources and tribal autonomy.
A watershed issue: the role of streamflow protection in Northwest river basin management.
Leasing water rights for instream flow uses: a survey of water transfer policy, practices, and problems in the Pacific Northwest.
To clear the muddy waters: tribal regulatory authority under section 518 of the Clean Water Act.
Stakeholders and Water Rights in Montana: An Introduction.
Water Law and the American West.
Conflict comes to roost! The Bureau of Reclamation and the federal Indian trust responsibility.
Water dispute resolution in the West: process elements for the modern era in basin-wide problem solving.
The Nez Perce water rights settlement and the revolution in Indian country.
The mirage of Indian reserved water rights and western streamflow restoration in the McCarran amendment era: a promise unfulfilled.

Terms of use | Copyright © 2014 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters