Printer Friendly
The Free Library
14,678,647 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Terrorism takes toll on privacy worldwide. (Up front: news, trends & analysis).


Privacy has become an unwitting victim of the 2001 terrorist attacks on the United States United States, officially United States of America, republic (2005 est. pop. 295,734,000), 3,539,227 sq mi (9,166,598 sq km), North America. The United States is the world's third largest country in population and the fourth largest country in area.  and the subsequent war on terrorism Terrorist acts and the threat of Terrorism have occupied the various law enforcement agencies in the U.S. government for many years. The Anti-Terrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, as amended by the usa patriot act . But privacy is not just in danger in the United States. According to according to
prep.
1. As stated or indicated by; on the authority of: according to historians.

2. In keeping with: according to instructions.

3.
 a recent report by privacy activist organizations Electronic Privacy Information Center Electronic Privacy Information Center or EPIC is a public interest research group in Washington D.C.. It was established in 1994 to focus public attention on emerging civil liberties issues and to protect privacy, the First Amendment, and constitutional values in the  and Privacy International, many countries have passed new laws that value increased security over personal privacy. In addition to U.S. laws, the report lists new anti-terrorism legislation in Australia, Austria, Britain, Canada, Denmark, France, Germany, India, Singapore, and Sweden.

Many of the laws, the report notes, have been proposed and rejected for years, only to gain acceptance after the September 11, 2001, attacks. As a result, governments worldwide have made it easier for authorities to expand citizen databases and eavesdrop eaves·drop  
intr.v. eaves·dropped, eaves·drop·ping, eaves·drops
To listen secretly to the private conversation of others.
 on telephone and online conversations under the auspices of fighting terrorism. For example, U.S. anti-terror legislation lowered the bar on authorities' surveillance requirements.

In June, the European Union European Union (EU), name given since the ratification (Nov., 1993) of the Treaty of European Union, or Maastricht Treaty, to the

European Community
 allowed its member states to require that Internet providers retain traffic and location data of all people using any electronic communications device, including mobile phones, faxes, e-mail, and the Internet. The Russian internal security service recently tried to order all Internet providers to install surveillance software, at the company's cost, so that police could perform instant searches without a warrant. There also is increased interest in personal surveillance through biometrics technology and spy cameras. In Britain, there are an estimated 1.5 million cameras that watch public streets and parks.

The report also found that governments want to merge their existing databases, such as those for social programs and traffic infractions, to create profiles to catch suspected terrorists. These actions have dismayed privacy advocates, who fear free speech restrictions and abuses of power.

A bipartisan report by some of the United States' leading information technology and national security experts recommended that the Bush administration develop a system to share intelligence gathered in the United States and abroad among local, state, and federal agencies while developing guidelines to protect against abuses. The 173-page report, "Protecting America's Freedom in an Information Age," outlines a road map for establishing truly national, decentralized de·cen·tral·ize  
v. de·cen·tral·ized, de·cen·tral·iz·ing, de·cen·tral·iz·es

v.tr.
1. To distribute the administrative functions or powers of (a central authority) among several local authorities.
 information systems that would both protect privacy and prevent terror. It endorses giving responsibility for analyzing such information to a new domestic intelligence center in the U.S. Department of Homeland Security Noun 1. Department of Homeland Security - the federal department that administers all matters relating to homeland security
Homeland Security

executive department - a federal department in the executive branch of the government of the United States
 rather than to the Federal Bureau of Investigation Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), division of the U.S. Dept. of Justice charged with investigating all violations of federal laws except those assigned to some other federal agency. . The study also calls upon Bush to develop new guidelines on what information federal agencies may and may not collect about individuals in the United States and with whom, and under what circumstances, such data may be shared.

Despite such proposals, most experts say that privacy post-9/11 will never be the same in any country.
COPYRIGHT 2002 Association of Records Managers & Administrators (ARMA)
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2002, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:Swartz, Nikki
Publication:Information Management Journal
Date:Nov 1, 2002
Words:450
Previous Article:Groups join to ban Spam. (Up front: news, trends & analysis).(Brief Article)
Next Article:E-mails: to delete or not. (Delete?).(Brief Article)
Topics:



Related Articles
High Security, High Alert: 10 Future Trends. (Business Briefs).(Brief Article)
The changing political landscape: the war on terrorism delays congressional action on privacy, the Paperwork Reduction Act, and e-government....
Freedom for safety: an old trade--and a useless one.(privacy and freedom swapped for security and safety following September 11 terrorists attacks )
The global reach of privacy invasion.
The new shape of civil liberties: in the post-9/11 world, Americans are under more scrutiny and surveillance than ever before. How far should...
Canadians' privacy at risk. (Up front: news, trends & analysis).(Brief Article)
Compromising customers' privacy. (Up front: news, trends & analysis).(companies supplying data to U.S. government could leave them open to litigation)
Property and asset management.(NAA Capital Conference)
"Privacy and Data Security Review" from Sheshunoff.
Network Security Hacks, Second Edition Tips & Tools for Protecting Your Privacy.

Terms of use | Copyright © 2009 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles