Printer Friendly
The Free Library
18,914,692 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Technology Contracts And The Companies Act.




The Companies Act 2006 (the "2006 Act"), which is coming into force in stages, is re-shaping company law in the United Kingdom. Parts of the 2006 Act which came into force on 6 April 2008 impact the drafting and execution of technology (and commercial) contracts generally.

Defined Terms

Technology contracts frequently refer to sections of the Companies Act 1985 (as amended a·mend  
v. a·mend·ed, a·mend·ing, a·mends

v.tr.
1. To change for the better; improve: amended the earlier proposal so as to make it more comprehensive.

2.
) ("1985 Act") to define what constitutes a "group" (e.g. for the purposes of scoping the licence granted or setting out who the benefit of the agreement can be assigned to). For contracts executed from 6 April 2008, these references may need to be updated to refer to the relevant sections of the 2006 Act. The table below details sections of the 1985 Act frequently referred to in defining a "group" and the corresponding section reference in the 2006 Act (the relevant sections having come into force on 6 April 2008). The definitions in these sections are effectively the same under the 1985 Act and the 2006 Act.

> In updating these references, it is important to remember that the terms "parent undertaking" and "subsidiary undertaking" are used in the Companies Acts to define an 'accounting' group whereas the terms "holding company" and "subsidiary" are used to define a 'legal' group. This means that the constituent members of an accounting and legal group may well be different. In particular, an 'accounting group' may be larger and include non-corporate entities such as partnerships and unincorporated Adj. 1. unincorporated - not organized and maintained as a legal corporation
unorganised, unorganized - not having or belonging to a structured whole; "unorganized territories lack a formal government"
 associations.

If a technology contract makes general reference to the 1985 Act (e.g. in the interpretation clause), it is important to remember that it should also make reference to the 2006 Act (as parts of both of these Acts are currently in force).

Execution of documents by a company formed under the Companies Acts Ordinary Contracts. Section 43 of the 2006 Act restates the position in the 1985 Act on executing a 'simple' contract (i.e. a contract which is not a deed deed, in law, written document that is signed and delivered by which one person conveys land or other realty (see property) to another. A deed may assure the extent of the conveying party's ownership or, if the party is uncertain of the precise extent, he issues a ). Specifically, a single signatory sig·na·to·ry  
adj.
Bound by signed agreement: the signatory parties to a contract.

n. pl. sig·na·to·ries
One that has signed a treaty or other document.
 can sign on behalf of a company if that signatory has the necessary express or implied authority Implied Authority of Contract is a legal term. In contract law, it is the implied ability of an individual to make a legally binding contract on behalf of an organization, by way of uniform or interaction with the public on behalf of that organization. .

Deeds. One of the key changes made by the 2006 Act is to introduce a new method for the execution of a deed.

Briefly and by way of background, the key differences between a deed and a simple contract are that some additional execution formality formality, in chemistry: see chemical equilibrium; concentration.  is required (beyond a simple signature) for a deed to be enforceable. Also, deeds are generally enforceable despite a lack of consideration and the limitation period for actions brought under a deed is generally 12 years from the date on which the cause of action accrued ac·crue  
v. ac·crued, ac·cru·ing, ac·crues

v.intr.
1. To come to one as a gain, addition, or increment: interest accruing in my savings account.

2.
 (the period is 6 years under a simple contract).

The reasons commonly encountered for executing a technology contract as a deed include (i) the existence of concerns as to the consideration (e.g. because the agreement includes a parent company guarantee), (ii) that a longer limitation period is sought and (iii) that there is a power of attorney in the contract to support the transfer of an asset such as intellectual property rights (under English law The system of law that has developed in England from approximately 1066 to the present.

The body of English law includes legislation, Common Law, and a host of other legal norms established by Parliament, the Crown, and the judiciary.
 a power of attorney must be executed as a deed).

Execution of a Deed. The 2006 Act does not change the traditional method for execution of a deed i.e. by the company affixing a common seal COMMON SEAL, A seal used by a corporation. See Corporation.  which is attested at·test  
v. at·test·ed, at·test·ing, at·tests

v.tr.
1. To affirm to be correct, true, or genuine: The date of the painting was attested by the appraiser.

2.
 to. However, Section 44(2) of the Act provides that if the company does not have a seal (or prefers not to use it) a document can be signed by a company as a deed if it is signed on behalf of the company by:

two "authorised Adj. 1. authorised - endowed with authority
authorized

lawful - conformable to or allowed by law; "lawful methods of dissent"

legitimate - of marriages and offspring; recognized as lawful
 signatories" (every director of a company is an authorised signatory as is the secretary or joint secretary of a public company or a private company with a secretary (it being no longer compulsory for a private company to have a secretary)). This reflects the position that existed under the 1985 Act in relation to the execution of deeds by a company; or

by one director, in the presence of a witness, who attests to the director's signature. This is a new method of executing a deed. The witness who may attest To solemnly declare verbally or in writing that a particular document or testimony about an event is a true and accurate representation of the facts; to bear witness to. To formally certify by a signature that the signer has been present at the execution of a particular writing so as  the director's signature need not be connected to the company in any way.

The new method will be required where a company does not have a secretary and will be useful in situations where it is difficult for two corporate officers to be available to execute a deed. It is also a useful alternative to having a power of attorney where only one signatory is available. At the back of this corporate clips is suggested wording for execution of a deed.

The general requirements imposed by common law and the Law of Property (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1989 for the making of a contract as a deed are not affected by the 2006 Act, i.e. the contract must be in writing; it must state on its face that it is a deed; and it must be validly executed as a deed and delivered.

Multiple signatures. Section 44(6) of the 2006 Act expands on the earlier rule that a person who is an officer of several companies and who signs a document on behalf of more than one of them must sign separately in each capacity for each of them. Specifically, this Section provides that where a document is to be signed by a person (including a person who is not an officer, such as an attorney) on behalf of more than one company, that person must sign separately in each capacity.

Attorney. Section 47 of the 2006 Act provides that a company which appoints an attorney to execute a document must, like an individual, do so by an instrument executed as deed. The 1985 Act did not specify that such an appointment must be by way of a deed (although this was always best practice based on case law in relation to the execution of deeds).

We have set out below some suggested execution wording:

EXECUTION USING A COMPANY'S COMMON SEAL > EXECUTION BY TWO AUTHORISED SIGNATORIES > EXECUTION BY ONE DIRECTOR > www.kemplittle.com

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances CIRCUMSTANCES, evidence. The particulars which accompany a fact.
     2. The facts proved are either possible or impossible, ordinary and probable, or extraordinary and improbable, recent or ancient; they may have happened near us, or afar off; they are public or
.

Ms Anne Dolan

Kemp n. 1. Coarse, rough hair in wool or fur, injuring its quality.  Little LLP LLP - Lower Layer Protocol  

Cheapside House

138 Cheapside

London

EC2V 6BJ

UNITED KINGDOM

Tel: 2076008080

Fax: 2076007878

E-mail: helle.asquith@kemplittle.com

URL URL
 in full Uniform Resource Locator

Address of a resource on the Internet. The resource can be any type of file stored on a server, such as a Web page, a text file, a graphics file, or an application program.
: www.kemplittle.com

Click Here for related articles

(c) Mondaq Ltd, 2008 - Tel. +44 (0)20 8544 8300 - http://www.mondaq.com
COPYRIGHT 2008 Mondaq Ltd.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2008 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Publication:Mondaq Business Briefing
Geographic Code:4EUUK
Date:Apr 28, 2008
Words:1090
Previous Article:IRS Releases Draft Instructions To Revised Form 990.
Next Article:State Taxation - Taxing Out-of-State Business Activities.
Topics:



Related Articles
Implications of the Electronic Signatures Act.
Intelligence tool: The Freedom of Information Act.(to help win future contracts)(Brief Article)
Will FBI have access to BC medicare data?(General)(Brief Article)
2005 Bankruptcy Code Amendments Affecting Financial Contracts.
DFARS Change Notice 20050916.(Policy & Legislation)
Congress should consider further acquisition reform.(GOVERNMENT POLICY NOTES)
Myanmar's Legal System And Contract Law1.
When Are Standard Terms Of Business Unfair?
Drafting Commercial Contracts.
Contracting Under Indian Or English Law: Part 1 - The Indian Legal Framework.

Terms of use | Copyright © 2010 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles