Printer Friendly
The Free Library
5,676,973 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Tax implications for Massachusetts same-sex marriages.


The May 17, 2004 recognition of same sex marriages in Massachusetts created an unprecedented gulf between Federal and state law. In Massachusetts, same-sex spouses are eligible for all benefits available to opposite-sex spouses and also are subject to all requirements applicable to opposite-sex spouses--from income, employment and state taxes, to state inheritance laws; see Technical Information Release (TIR TIR International Road Transport [French Transports Internationaux Routiers] ) 04-17 (7/7/04).

Under Federal law, on the other hand, the Defense of Marriage Act prevents same-sex spouses from taking advantage of certain rights granted to married couples, such as filing status, Social Security benefits and the estate tax marital deduction marital deduction n. when one spouse dies, the survivor may take a tax deduction of half of the value of the estate of the dying spouse. Thus, the minimum value of the estate before there is a possible federal estate tax rises from $600,000 to $1,200,000 at the death ; see Hillary, Goodridge v. Dep't of Pub. Health, 440 Mass. 309 (2003).

This item addresses the Massachusetts tax filing requirements for same sex spouses and reveals the complicated road ahead for such spouses residing in that state and the practitioners preparing their taxes. Although in 2004, these issues apply only to Massachusetts residents, future years will inevitably see additional states recognizing such marriages. Until the Federal government follows the lead of these states, the compliance gymnastics described below will persist.

Effect on Federal and State Income Taxes

Because Federal law does not recognize same-sex marriages, same-sex spouses must continue filing individual Federal returns. Same-sex couples legally married and residing in Massachusetts are required to file either jointly or married filing separately Married Filing Separately

A filing status for married couples who choose to record their respective incomes, exemptions and deductions on separate tax returns. This method is opposite to "married filing jointly" and has few benefits.
. A proforma Federal joint return may need to be prepared to ease the calculation of those elements of state taxation that depend on Federal law.

For example, adjusted gross income (AGI (Artificial General Intelligence) A machine intelligence that resembles that of a human being. Considered impossible by many, most artificial intelligence (AI) research, projects and products deal with specific applications such as industrial robots, playing chess, ) must be recalculated for state purposes to reflect AGI as if a Federal joint return bad been filed. The proforum Federal joint AGI will be used to calculate the allowable Massachusetts deductions for medical and dental expenses in excess of 7.5% of AGI, certain miscellaneous deductions that exceed 2% of AGI and student loan interest, which phases out based on modified AGI (MAGI).

Another calculation that follows Federal law is the limit on passive activity losses from actively managed rental real estate. Under Sec. 469(i), the Federal limit for MAGI under $150,000 is $25,000 for both single taxpayers and for married taxpayers filing jointly, and zero for MAGI over $150,000. Under the MAGI cutoff, a same-sex married couple with large real estate losses may deduct up to a total of $50,000 on their Federal returns, while for Massachusetts tax purposes, their joint loss will be limited to $25,000.

Finally, dependent care expenses must be recalculated as if a joint Federal Form 2441, Child and Dependent Care Expenses, had been filed, because the deduction for dependent care expenses is calculated based on Federal earned income Sources of money derived from the labor, professional service, or entrepreneurship of an individual taxpayer as opposed to funds generated by investments, dividends, and interest. .

Sales and Use Taxes

Same sex spouses qualify for the Massachusetts sales and use tax exemption on the sale or gift of a vehicle, trailer, boat or airplane between spouses. However, a gift tax return may be required for Federal purposes.

Employer Benefits

Spousal benefits spousal benefits Social medicine Benefits, including health and life insurance, provided to a spouse–ie, husband or wife–of an employee; in socially advanced nations and in the US, SBs may be extended to unmarried–including same sex–partners  provided to employees are generally excluded from Federal gross income; for Federal tax purposes, this exclusion does not apply to same sex spouses and their children, unless they qualify as dependents under Sec. 152.

For state tax purposes, however, any benefits that are tax-exempt when extended to opposite-sex spouses are also tax-exempt when extended to same-sex spouses. Thus, the fair market value of benefits attributable to a same-sex spouse will be included in the gross income of an employee for Federal purposes, and excluded for state purposes. Some of the benefits affected include employer-provided health insurance, Sec. 125 cafeteria plans and qualified tuition reductions offered to employees and their families by educational institutions.

Estate and Gift Taxes A combined federal tax on transfers by gift or death.

When property interests are given away during life or at death, taxes are imposed on the transfer. These taxes, known as estate and gift taxes, apply to the total transfers that an individual may make over a lifetime.
 

Many clients are unaware that marriage revokes a will unless the will was executed in contemplation of the marriage. If pre-marriage wills are not affirmed through a signed codicil A document that is executed by a person who had previously made his or her will, to modify, delete, qualify, or revoke provisions contained in it.

A codicil effectuates a change in an existing will without requiring that the will be reexecuted.
 at the very least, the individuals will die intestate The description of a person who dies without making a valid will or the reference made to this condition.


intestate adj. referring to a situation where a person dies without leaving a valid will.
 and subject to state inheritance laws. A Massachusetts same-sex spouse dying intestate will receive a portion of the spouse's estate by law, as follows:

* If there are surviving children, the spouse inherits one-half of the estate and the children inherit the remaining half.

* If there are no children, the spouse inherits the first $200,000, plus one-half of any excess, and the balance passes to living parents or, if none, to any sibling.

There is no Federal marital deduction on Form 706, United States United States, officially United States of America, republic (2005 est. pop. 295,734,000), 3,539,227 sq mi (9,166,598 sq km), North America. The United States is the world's third largest country in population and the fourth largest country in area.  Estate (and Generation-Skipping Transfer) Tax Return, for same-sex spouses. It is not yet certain whether Massachusetts will allow a marital deduction for the calculation of Form M-706, Massachusetts Resident Estate Tax Return, as most of- its estate tax laws reference the Federal laws, and the issue is not addressed in TIR 04-17.

Jointly owned property, is included in full on a Federal estate tax return, unless:

1. The surviving joint owner can prove contribution to the acquisition of the property; or

2. The joint owners joint owners nplcopropietarios mpl  are married, in which case 50% of jointly owned spousal property is included on the return of the first to die.

For Massachusetts same-sex spouses, the first rule applies for Federal purposes; the second rule applies to the state return.

For more discussion of the Federal tax issues, see Downer down·er
n.
A depressant or sedative drug, such as a barbiturate or tranquilizer.
, Tax Clinic, "Federal Tax Implications of Same Sex Marriage," p. 738, this issue.

SUSAN DAY, CPA (Computer Press Association, Landing, NJ) An earlier membership organization founded in 1983 that promoted excellence in computer journalism. Its annual awards honored outstanding examples in print, broadcast and electronic media. The CPA disbanded in 2000. , GRAY, GRAY & GRAY, LLP LLP - Lower Layer Protocol , WESTWOOD, MA
COPYRIGHT 2004 American Institute of CPA's
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2004, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:Day, Susan
Publication:The Tax Adviser
Date:Dec 1, 2004
Words:884
Previous Article:S Corporations, CGES and Sec. 179.(controlled group election statements)
Next Article:Divorce issues and business succession planning.
Topics:



Related Articles
Senate approves Bill C-23 (Canada).(Brief Article)
Opening marriage: do same-sex unions pave the way for polygamy?(Columns)
Marry me and save: gays and lesbians who can legally marry in May could enjoy a financial boost.(Money Talks)
Dodging the altar: gay men and lesbians aren't exactly rushing to marry in Canada. Why marriage equality isn't such a big deal up north.(Marriage)
Equal marriage, equal treatment.(Benefits)(Brief Article)
Gay marriage Inc.: fledgling companies are cashing in on gay and lesbian couples before and after they walk down the aisle.(Marriage)
Marriage gets real: newly married same-sex couples in Massachusetts are fitting in--as long as they stay local and don't ask the feds for...
Federal tax implications of same-sex marriage.
Arrogant judicial power.(judicial versus legislative approval of same-sex marriage)
The senators dodge.(support for, debate over Federal Marriage Amendment, legalization of same-sex marriages)

Terms of use | Copyright © 2009 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles