Printer Friendly
The Free Library
14,716,107 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Tax allocations for securities partnerships.


Due to several factors, including the volume of trading, frequency of changes in partners' profit and loss (P&L)-sharing percentages and their entering and exiting a partnership, realized gains Realized Gain

A gain resulting from selling an asset at a price higher than the original purchase price.

Notes:
There may be tax consequences for a realized profit.
 and losses cannot be allocated for tax purposes based on the partners' economic percentages in the period the gain or loss is recognized, without creating some inequity. This type of allocation The apportionment or designation of an item for a specific purpose or to a particular place.

In the law of trusts, the allocation of cash dividends earned by a stock that makes up the principal of a trust for a beneficiary usually means that the dividends will be treated as
 would lack Sec. 704 "substantial economic effect" because the allocation of recognized gains Recognized Gain

The amount of gain reported for income tax purposes.

Notes:
You can defer recognizing some gains until the following year(s).
See also: Capital Gain, Capital Loss, Deferred Income Tax, Drought Sale, Exempt Income, Exemption, Gain, Recognized Loss
 or losses might not be consistent with the actual economic effect reflected in the allocation for book purposes.

Background

Securities partnerships are defined as either management companies or investment partnerships that make all of their book allocations in proportion to the nonmanaging partners' relative book capital accounts. Partners who provide management or investment advisory services advisory services

advisory services provided to the public, in their capacity as owners and managers of animals, are an important part of veterinary science. They may be provided by government bureaux, by commercial companies who deal in pharmaceuticals or animals or animal
 can receive special allocations (such as management and incentive fees). A partnership is a management company if it is registered with the SEC as such under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended a·mend  
v. a·mend·ed, a·mend·ing, a·mends

v.tr.
1. To change for the better; improve: amended the earlier proposal so as to make it more comprehensive.

2.
 (15 USC An abbreviation for U.S. Code.  Section 80a). An investment partnership is a partnership that makes revaluations at least annually and on the date of each capital restatement Restatement

A revision in a company's earlier financial statements.

Notes:
The need for restating financial figures can result from fraud, misrepresentation, or a simple clerical error.
, and 90% of its noncash assets are deemed to be qualified financial assets Financial assets

Claims on real assets.
. A qualified financial asset is any personal property (including stock), actively traded (as defined in Regs. Sec. 1.1092(d)-1) for purposes of the straddle In the stock and commodity markets, a strategy in options contracts consisting of an equal number of put options and call options on the same underlying share, index, or commodity future.  rules.

Allocation Methods

Example: On Jan. 1, 2003, Partners A and B each contribute $500,000 in return for a 50% interest in securities partnership AB. AB uses the money to purchase X Corp. shares. At the first revaluation Revaluation

A calculated adjustment to a country's official exchange rate relative to a chosen baseline. The baseline can be anything from wage rates to the price of gold to a foreign currency. In a fixed exchange rate regime, only a decision by a country's government (i.e.
 of the partnership's assets on March 31, 2003, the investment in X is valued at $2 million; the book value of A's and B's capital accounts is $1 million each. On April 1,2003, C purchases a 33% interest in AB for $1 million. ABC ABC
 in full American Broadcasting Co.

Major U.S. television network. It began when the expanding national radio network NBC split into the separate Red and Blue networks in 1928.
 then uses C's $1 million to purchase shares of D Corp. On June June: see month.  30, 2003, ABC sells its entire investment in X for $1.5 million and its investment in D for $200,000. The partnership recognizes a $500,000 gain on the sale of the X stock and an $800,000 loss on the sale of the D stock.

In the example, if realized gains and losses were allocated based on the partners' economic percentages for the period in which they were recognized, each partner would be allocated a $100,000 net realized loss Realized Loss

A loss recognized when assets are sold for a price lower than the original purchase price.

Notes:
A portion of the realized loss may be applied against a capital gain or realized profit to reduce taxes.
; see Exhibit 1 on p. 473. Due to the timing or appreciation of the partnership's investment in X, A and B received all of the economic benefit of the appreciation, but C was allocated $166,667 of realized gain and received the same economic loss. To minimize In a graphical environment, to hide an application that is currently displayed on screen. For example, in Windows and Mac, the application's window is removed from the screen and represented by an icon on the Windows Taskbar. In the Mac, the icon is placed in the Dock. See Win Minimize windows.  these disparities, the Code allows securities partnerships to use alternative methods to allocate To reserve a resource such as memory or disk. See memory allocation.  realized gains and losses.

Layering method. When using this method, securities partnerships allocate gains and losses on a partner-by-partner/ security-by-security basis. This allocates recognized gains and losses in the same proportion as the underlying unrealized gains Unrealized Gain

A profit that results from holding on to an asset rather than cashing it in and using the funds.

Notes:
Let's say you own a stock that has doubled, but you haven't sold it yet. This is said to be an unrealized gain.
 and losses were allocated to each partner's book capital account. This would require the securities partnership to track the unrealized gains or losses of each lot of stock by each period in which there was a change in partners' P&L-sharing percentages due to a contribution, distribution or withdrawal.

When a gain or loss is recognized, each "layer" of the gain or loss is allocated to the partners based on their ownership percentages for each period. In the above example, the $500,000 realized gain on the sale of X would be split into two layers--a $1 million gain from January January: see month.  l-March 31 and a $500,000 loss from April l-June 30. Because the investment in D was purchased and sold within the same period, the $800,000 loss would be allocated solely based on the partners' P&L-sharing ratios for that period; see Exhibit 2 on p. 474.

When applying the layering method to this example, there is no disparity dis·par·i·ty  
n. pl. dis·par·i·ties
1. The condition or fact of being unequal, as in age, rank, or degree; difference: "narrow the economic disparities among regions and industries" 
 between each partner's book and tax capital account. This method offers accuracy, but is time-consuming time-con·sum·ing
adj.
Taking up much time.


time-consuming
Adjective

taking up a great deal of time

Adj. 1.
 because of the potentially high number of positions, changing P&L-sharing ratios and turnover; further, the software packages capable of performing these calculations may be cost-prohibitive for some securities partnerships.

Aggregate method. Under this method, securities partnerships allocate realized gains and losses based on the unrealized gains or losses allocated to a partner as a whole, rather than on a security-by-security basis. This minimizes the record-keeping burden found in the layering method, while still minimizing book-versus-tax capital account disparities. The partial-netting and full-netting approaches are the acceptable methods for applying the aggregate method; see Exhibit 3 on p. 476. To allocate gains and losses, the partnership establishes a memorandum An informal record, in the form of a brief written note or outline, of a particular legal transaction or document for the purpose of aiding the parties in remembering particular points or for future reference.  account that tracks the difference between each partner's book and tax capital account. Under the aggregate method, the partnership allocates gains and losses to each partner to minimize the disparities or the balance in the memorandum account.

Partial netting. Under this approach, book gains and losses are netted together for book allocations, but realized gains and losses are aggregated separately before allocation to the partners. Gains are first allocated to the partners whose memorandum account has a positive balance (book capital greater than tax capital), by multiplying mul·ti·ply 1  
v. mul·ti·plied, mul·ti·ply·ing, mul·ti·plies

v.tr.
1. To increase the amount, number, or degree of.

2. Mathematics To perform multiplication on.
 the total gains by each partner's percent of the total positive memorandum account, but only until the memorandum account equals zero. Any additional gains are allocated to each partner based on his or her sharing ratio. Losses are allocated first to partners with negative balances and then in the same way as gains.

Full netting. Under this approach, both book and tax gains are netted together for allocation purposes. If after netting all tax gains, a net gain exists, it would be allocated to partners with positive memorandum accounts first, with any excess then applied to each partner based on his or her sharing ratio.

Conclusion

The three different approaches can render (1) To make visible; to draw. The term comes from the graphics world where a rendering is an artist's drawing of what a new structure would look like. In computer-aided design (CAD), a rendering is a particular view of a 3D model that has been converted into a realistic image.  both similar and different results. Ultimately, management must pick the method that best fits the partnership. The method must preserve the character and other tax attributes of each item of gain or loss; be determined under a consistently applied approach; and not be determined with a view toward reducing substantially the present value of the partners' aggregate tax liability.
Exhibit 1: Book and tax capital accounts

Book capital
accounts

                                  Valuation
                      1/1/03     adjustment     3/31/03       4/1/03

Cash
X stock              1,000,000    1,000,000    2,000,000
D stock                                                     1,000,000

Assets               1,000,000    1,000,000    2,000,000    1,000,000

Partner A              500,000      500,000    1,000,000
Partner B              500,000      500,000    1,000,000
Partner C                                                   1,000,000

Partners' capital    1,000,000    1,000,000    2,000,000    1,000,000

Tax capital
accounts

                                  Realized
                      1/1/03     gain/(loss)    3/31/03      4/1/03

Cash
X stock              1,000,000                 1,000,000
D stock                                                     1,000,000

Assets               1,000,000                 1,000,000    1,000,000

Partner A              500,000                   500,000
Partner B              500,000                   500,000
Partner C                                                   1,000,000

Partners' capitol    1,000,000                 1,000,000    1,000,000

Book capital
accounts

                     Valuation     Sale of
                    adjustment      stock        6/30/03

Cash                              1,700,000     1,700,000
X stock              (500,000)   (1,500,000)
D stock              (800,000)     (200,000)

Assets             (1,300,000)           --     1,700,000

Partner A            (433,333)                    566,667
Partner B            (433,333)                    566,667
Partner C            (433,333)                    566,667

Partners' capital  (1,300,000)           --     1,700,000

Tax capital
accounts

                     Realized      Sale of
                    gain/(loss)     stock        6/30/03

Cash                              1,700,000     1,700,000
X stock               500,000    (1,500,000)           --
D stock              (800,000)     (200,000)           --

Assets               (300,000)           --     1,700,000

Partner A            (100,000)                    400,000
Partner B            (100,000)                    400,000
Partner C            (100,000)                    900,000

Partners' capitol    (300,000)                  1,700,000

Exhibit 2: Layering method

                   1/1 to 3/31  4/1 to 6/30
                      layer        layer        Total

X                    1,000,000   (500,000)     500,000
Partner A's share      500,000   (166,667)     333,333
Partner B's share      500,000   (166,667)     333,333
Partner C's share                (166,667)    (166,667)
                     1,000,000   (500,000)     500,000

D                           --   (800,000)    (800,000)

Partner A's share           --   (266,667)    (266,667)
Partner B's share           --   (266,667)    (266,667)
Partner C's share                (266,667)    (266,667)
                            --   (800,000)    (800,000)

Total                1,000,000  (1,300,000)   (300,000)

Partner A's share      500,000   (433,333)      66,667
Partner B's share      500,000   (433,333)      66,667
Partner C's share           --   (433,333)    (433,333)

                     1,000,000  (1,300,000)   (300,000)

Tax capital
accounts

                                 Realized
                       1/1/03   gain/(loss)     3/31/03

Cash
X                    1,000,000                 1,000,000
D

Assets               1,000,000                 1,000,000

Partner A              500,000                   500,000
Partner B              500,000                   500,000
Partner C

Partners' capital    1,000,000                 1,000,000

Tax capital
accounts

                                 Realized      Sale of
                       4/1/03   gain/(loss)     stock         6/30/03

Cash                                           1,700,000     1,700,000
X                                 500,000     (1,500,000)           --
D                    1,000,000   (800,000)      (200,000)           --

Assets               1,000,000   (300,000)            --     1,700,000

Partner A                          66,667                      566,667
Partner B                          66,667                      566,667
Partner C            1,000,000   (433,333)                     566,667

Partners' capital    1,000,000   (300,000)                  1,700,000

Exhibit 3: Aggregation approaches

Aggregation
method

                               Tax capital
                                 before
                     Book       realized     Positive     Negative
                    capital      gains/     memorandum   memorandum
Partner             6/30/03      losses       account      account

Partner A           566,667      500,000       66,667
Partner B           566,667      500,000       66,667
Partner C           566,667    1,000,000                (433,333)

                  1,700,000    2,000,000      133,334   (433,333)

Partial-netting
approach

                                  Gains       Losses
                  Tax capital   allocated    allocated
                    before      based on     based on
                   realized    memorandum   memorandum
                    gains/       account      account
Partner             losses      balances     balances

Partner A           500,000       66,667          --
Partner B           500,000       66,667          --
Partner C         1,000,000           --   (433,333)

                  2,000,000      133,334   (433,333)

                     Gains       Losses
                   allocated    allocated
                   based on     based on
                    sharing      sharing    Tax capital
Partner             ratios       ratios        6/30

Partner A           122,223   (122,223)       566,667
Partner B           122,223   (122,223)       566,667
Partner C           122,223   (122,223)       566,667

                    366,669   (366,669)     1,700,000

Full-netting
approach

                                Net losses
                  Tax capital    allocated     Losses
                    before       based on     allocated
                   realized     memorandum    based on
                    gains/        account      sharing    Tax capital
Partner             losses       balances      ratios        6/30

Partner A           500,000           --                    500,000
Partner B           500,000           --                    500,000
Partner C         1,000,000    (300,000)                    700,000

                  2,000,000    (300,000)           --     1,700,000


FROM CHRIS BELLAMY Chris Bellamy, born Christopher Eric Bellamy August 3, 1978 in Virginia Beach, Virginia is a saxophonist and guitarist in the Hampton Roads area. He has performed with artists Gladys Knight, Toni Tennille of Captain and Tennille, Tommy Newsome of the Tonight Show band, and Chris , CPA (Computer Press Association, Landing, NJ) An earlier membership organization founded in 1983 that promoted excellence in computer journalism. Its annual awards honored outstanding examples in print, broadcast and electronic media. The CPA disbanded in 2000. , COHEN cohen
 or kohen

(Hebrew: “priest”) Jewish priest descended from Zadok (a descendant of Aaron), priest at the First Temple of Jerusalem. The biblical priesthood was hereditary and male.
 & COMPANY, LTD LTD 1 Laron-type dwarfism 2 Leukotriene D 3 Long-term depression, see there 4. Long-term disability ., CLEVELAND Cleveland, former county, England
Cleveland, former county, NE England, created under the Local Government Act of 1972 (effective 1974). It was composed of the county boroughs of Hartlepool and Teeside and parts of the former counties of Durham and
, OH
COPYRIGHT 2003 American Institute of CPA's
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2003, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:Bellamy, Chris
Publication:The Tax Adviser
Date:Aug 1, 2003
Words:1802
Previous Article:Allocating settlement proceeds in employment cases.
Next Article:A case for updating P.L. 86-272.(Interstate Income Tax Act of 1959)
Topics:



Related Articles
New regulations clarify partnership allocations related to contributed property. (Brief Article)
Several options available for property contributed to a partnership.
Accounting for the value of a partner's services.
Allocations relating to property contributed to partnership.
Accounting for book-tax differences of property contributed to a partnership. (part 2)
Regulations on allocations relating to contributed property affect securities partnerships.
Partnership's allocation method satisfies sec. 704(b) and (c).
Is sec. 704(c) or sale treatment better for a contributing partner?
Reverse sec. 704(c) allocations for securities partnerships.
Understanding the mechanics of minimum gain.

Terms of use | Copyright © 2009 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles