Printer Friendly

Taking food from thought: fruitful entry to the brain's word index.

Early in 1983, researchers at the University of Maryland and Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore saw a stroke patient with a bizarre problem. Many stroke victims suffer wide-ranging memory losses, but this patient was fine save for his inability to remember the names of many fruits and vegetables. As it turned out, his produce problem provided the scientists with important clues to the "thesaurus-like" ordering of words in the brain.

Although the patient s a sample of one, he displays the most specific organization of categories of words in a discrete brain area yet observed, according to investigators John Hart Jr., Rita Sloan Berndt and Alfonso Caramazza.

The patient, whom hey dubbed "M.D.," did not fit into their larger study of gross language problems since he had virtually recovered from several strokes that had occurred almost two years earlier. He complained, however, of difficulty remembering certain "food" words. Further tests suggested that his core problem was with the names of fruits and vegetables. M.D. could, for instance, name pictures of an abacus or a sphinx, but he was dumbfounded when shown an orange or a peach.

Over the next year, to better understand M.D.'s unusual problem, the scientists probed his knowledge of word categories. When asked to name a large number of fruits and vegetables -- using drawings, photographs or actual pieces of produce -- he was correct just under two-thirds of the time. But when shown other items, such as vehicles, household objects, animals, shapes and trees, he correctly named nearly all of them. When M.D. ha to sort pictures from different conceptual classes into appropriate piles, he again had considerable difficulty only with fruits and vegetables. (The other classes were animals, vehicles and food products.) The same pattern emerged when he was asked to generate as many names as possible from a series of categories and to name items based on verbal definitions or on feeling an object without seeing it.

On the other hand, report the scientists in the Aug. 1 NATURE, when provided with the names of fruits and vegetables, M.D. pointed "immediately and with certainty" to the corresponding pictures. He categorized correctly all the written names of fruits and vegetables that had mystified him as pictures.

"It is as if the name is the key to knowledge of fruits and vegetables; the patient cannot find the key for himself," writes psychologist John C. Marshall of Radcliffe Infirmary in Oxford, England, in the same issue. "But, given the name key by the examiner, the patient has no problem in unlocking his apparently intact store of information about fruits and vegetables." According to Marshall, this indicates that M.D.'s brain lesion, which involved the frontal lobe of the cortex and the basal ganglia, impaired part of a "thesaurus-like indexing system of names that give access to the knowledge base represented in the brain."

Cautions Berndt, "We only have data on one patient, but this clearly suggests that items in the mental 'encyclopedia' are organized along specific categories in the same brain area."

Her claim that the estimated 75,000 words that an educated adult commands may be categorically indexed in the brain goes beyond previous findings with brain-damaged individuals. It is known that left-hemisphere damage can, for example, interfere with memory for faces, colors, color names and numbers. British researchers recently identified more fine-grained disturbances in four brain-damaged patients who were markedly better at naming inanimate objects than they were at naming living things and foods.

"Evidence is beginning to accrue for [Berndt's] claim that there is semantic memory composition in the brain for categories cush as vegetables and flowers," comments psychologist Myrna Schwartz of the University of Pennsylvania in Philadelphia. More patients need to be examined for similar category-specific deficits, she adds; this is rarely done with stroke victims. Research in the area is further limited, explains Schwartz, who works with Alzheimer's disease patients, because it is not known how common various language and memory problems are among brain-damaged patients and data are scarce on their language capacities prior to brain damage.

Nevertheless, Berndt says that M.D., who has returned to work at a federal agency, has shown investigators that an adult's vocabulary may be segmented into specific categories that can be disrupted "highly selectively" when the brain is injured.
COPYRIGHT 1985 Science Service, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 1985, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:research on brain injury
Author:Bower, Bruce
Publication:Science News
Date:Aug 10, 1985
Words:720
Previous Article:Supernova encounter of a third kind.
Next Article:Spacelab 2 on the space shuttle: abort to success.
Topics:


Related Articles
Emotional changes following brain injury: psychological and neurological components of depression, denial and anxiety.
Introduction to the RSA regional brain injury centers.
Maximizing the continuum of care through prevention.
Outreach from the regional centers to improve services for brain injury survivors in the community.
Whole-brain interpreter: a cognitive neuroscientist seeks to make theoretical headway among split brains.
Creatures in the brain: various concepts may emanate from separate cerebral niches.
Proving cognitive and behavioral brain injuries.
A brain area to count on.
Brains show two sides of language function. (Hemispheric Cross Talk).

Terms of use | Copyright © 2016 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters