Printer Friendly
The Free Library
14,634,628 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

TOBACCO BILL VOTE COULD BENEFIT L.A.


Byline: Lee Condon Daily News Staff Writer

The U.S. Senate vote blocking tobacco legislation this year may turn out to be a blessing in disguise for the city and county of Los Angeles Los Angeles (lôs ăn`jələs, lŏs, ăn`jəlēz'), city (1990 pop. 3,485,398), seat of Los Angeles co., S Calif.; inc. 1850. , Supervisor Zev Yaroslavsky Zev Yaroslavsky (born December 21, 1948) is a Los Angeles County politician. He served on the Los Angeles City Council from 1975 until 1994, when he was elected to the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors. He was preceded in both offices by Edmund D. Edelman.  said Thursday.

``It frees us up to proceed full steam ahead with our lawsuit,'' Yaroslavsky said. ``I look forward to trying this case in court. It allows counties and cities to prosecute these cases in front of judges and juries. Big Tobacco may have brought themselves bigger problems than they thought.''

Los Angeles County sued tobacco companies in August 1996, joining states and communities around the country in challenging the tobacco industry. Now that federal legislation has been delayed for at least a year, plaintiffs can move ahead individually in court.

``If Congress had acted, it might have taken away our right to (pursue) such a suit,'' he said.

The Los Angeles lawsuit is expected to be coordinated with similar cases brought by 13 other counties, the city of Los Angeles
For the city, see Los Angeles, California.
The City of Los Angeles was a streamlined passenger train jointly operated by the Chicago and North Western Railway and the Union Pacific Railroad.
, the city of San Francisco
For the city, see San Francisco, California.
The City of San Francisco was a streamlined passenger train operated jointly by the Chicago and North Western Railway, the Southern Pacific Railroad, and the Union Pacific Railroad.
 and the state of California, and is slated to go to trial in February 1999.

The suit claims tobacco companies have violated a section of the California Business and Professional Code, which outlaws dishonest and deceptive de·cep·tive  
adj.
Deceptive or tending to deceive.



de·ceptive·ness n.
 business practices, including targeting minors in advertising.

``I'm a classic case of who they went after,'' Yaroslavsky said. ``You never lose that temptation.''

The suit seeks reimbursement Reimbursement

Payment made to someone for out-of-pocket expenses has incurred.
 for the $200 million to $300 million the county pays annually to treat smoking-related illnesses in its public health system, which provides care to the county's 2.7 million uninsured residents.
COPYRIGHT 1998 Daily News
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 1998, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Publication:Daily News (Los Angeles, CA)
Date:Jun 19, 1998
Words:267
Previous Article:EX-EXPLORER CLAIMS ABUSE IN LAPD SUIT.(News)
Next Article:MUSICAL HELPS CAST TAP INTO EMOTIONS.(News)



Related Articles
Bread and circuses: up in smoke.(Pres Bill Clinton's failed tobacco legislation)(Brief Article)
Who didn't kill tobacco killers?(On the Right)(Pres Bill Clinton's and Congress' stance on tobacco industry is confused)(Column)(Brief Article)
IN THE CAPITAL.
TOBACCO BILL DIES; BACKERS FALL SHORT IN CRUCIAL SENATE VOTE.(News)
BARS MAY DODGE SMOKE BAN; BILL WOULD LET SOME EXEMPT SELVES.(News)
CLINTON, GOP DELAY TRADE BILL VOTE AS SUPPORT FALLS SHORT.(NEWS)
PUBLIC FORUM : ALCOHOL INDUSTRY MUST BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE.(Editorial)(Editorial)(Letter to the Editor)
Legislators' views on tobacco policy: Are there regional differences in Kentucky?
Taking on tobacco.(Editorials)(Congress must seize chance to bolster regulation)(Editorial)
EDITORIAL SPLIT ON TAXES ADOPT OIL TAX; REJECT TOBACCO TAX.(Editorial)(Editorial)

Terms of use | Copyright © 2009 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles