Printer Friendly
The Free Library
14,716,803 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Supreme Court supports Nova Scotia family court judge in protective care ruling.


OTTAWA -- The Supreme Court of Canada The Supreme Court of Canada (French: Cour suprême du Canada) is the highest court of Canada and is the final court of appeal in the Canadian justice system.[1]  agreed that a Nova Scotia Nova Scotia (nō`və skō`shə) [Lat.,=new Scotland], province (2001 pop. 908,007), 21,425 sq mi (55,491 sq km), E Canada. Geography
 family court had the jurisdiction to determine where an adult needing protective custody An arrangement whereby a person is safeguarded by law enforcement authorities in a location other than the person's home because his or her safety is seriously threatened.  should receive care.

An adult, (identified as "J." was found by a Family Court judge to be in need of protective custody under Nova Scotia law. The judge would not permit the the Minister of Health to vary the order by placing him for care outside of Halifax. The Minister's reasons were lack of funds and staffing for the Halifax area.

The judge concluded that the Minister's proposed placement was contrary to J.'s welfare and would not enhance her ability to care and fend for Verb 1. fend for - argue or speak in defense of; "She supported the motion to strike"
defend, support

argue, reason - present reasons and arguments
 herself.

The Court of Appeal found that the Family Court judge had exceeded her jurisdiction by prohibiting J.'s placement outside the Halifax region, holding that when the Family Court is provided with only one plan of care, its jurisdiction under the Adult Protection Act is limited to simply accepting or vetoing it.

The Supreme Court of Canada supported the family court judge.

The Advocacy Centre for the Elderly, People First of Canada and Canadian Canadian (kənā`dēən), river, 906 mi (1,458 km) long, rising in NE New Mexico. and flowing E across N Texas and central Oklahoma into the Arkansas River in E Oklahoma.  Association for Community Living were intervenors.
COPYRIGHT 2005 Community Action Publishers
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2005, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:HEALTH
Publication:Community Action
Article Type:Brief Article
Geographic Code:1CNOV
Date:Apr 18, 2005
Words:191
Previous Article:New fellowship for study in rural and remote health care needs.(HEALTH)(Brenda Elias receivs Gerry McDole Fellowship)(Brief Article)
Next Article:How many long term care beds in BC? Minister's count differs from CCPA's.(HEALTH)(Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives)(Brief Article)
Topics:



Related Articles
Miscellaneous Canadiana.(Brief Article)
Same-sex couples (Canada).(adoption laws and the constitution)(Brief Article)
Online research strategies for the bookish lawyer: lawyers with more legal than technical know-how can still use the many computer tools available to...
Morgentaler may sue NB and NS for support of abortion clinics. (Health).
Supreme Court expanding judicial powers.(Canada)(Brief Article)
From Doctoral candidate in Acadian Education History, Brad Sweet.(Letters To The Editor)(Letter to the Editor)
Democracy and religion beyond judicial activism.(the Doucet-Boudreau case is examined)
Morris Fish, Rosalie Abella, Louise Charron.(Canada)(Brief Article)
Top court backs family judge on placing adult in Halifax area.(HEALTH)(Brief article)
A timeline of the homosexual "rights" juggernaut.

Terms of use | Copyright © 2009 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles