Printer Friendly
The Free Library
22,710,190 articles and books

Supreme Court senility: historian David J. Garrow discusses decrepit judges.

William Rehnquist Noun 1. William Rehnquist - United States jurist who served as an associate justice on the United States Supreme Court from 1972 until 1986, when he was appointed chief justice (born in 1924)
Rehnquist, William Hubbs Rehnquist
, the chief justice of the U.S. Supreme Court, announced in October that he had thyroid cancer Thyroid Cancer Definition

Thyroid cancer is a disease in which the cells of the thyroid gland become abnormal, grow uncontrollably, and form a mass of cells called a tumor.
. John Paul Stevens John Paul Stevens (born April 20, 1920) is currently the most senior Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States. He joined the Court in 1975 and is the oldest and longest serving incumbent member of the Court. , the long-serving associate justice, just turned 85. From the outside, it's hard to tell whether they're still able to perform the jobs they hold. But we do have an idea of what the worst-case scenario worst-case scenario nSchlimmstfallszenario nt  would look like.

In his last years on the Court, Thurgood Marshall For people and institutions etc. named after Thurgood Marshall, see .
Thurgood Marshall (July 2, 1908 – January 24, 1993) was an American jurist and the first African American to serve on the Supreme Court of the United States.
 reportedly spent his days telling tales, watching TV, and letting his clerks do the bulk of his work. Slow, feeble, and increasingly deaf, he once embarrassed himself during oral arguments by revealing he didn't realize which side the lawyer he was interrogating represented.

He probably didn't realize it, but he was part of a long Supreme Court tradition. A decade and a half earlier, William O. Douglas O. Douglas is the pen name of Anna Masterton Buchan (1877-1948), a Scottish novelist.[1] She was born in Perth, Scotland, the daughter of the Reverend John Buchan and Helen Masterton, and the younger sister of John Buchan, the renowned statesman and author.  closed out his time on the bench by dozing during arguments, addressing people by the wrong names, and speaking in non sequiturs; after his resignation, he continued to show up for work, apparently convinced that he was still on the Court. Joseph McKenna
For Joseph McKenna the member (Volunteer) in the Irish Republican Army see

Joseph McKenna (August 10, 1843–November 21, 1926) was an American politician who served in all three branches of the U.S. federal government, as a member of the U.S.
 was so incompetent at the end of his term that, in the words of his colleague William Howard Taft, he once "wrote an opinion deciding the case one way when there had been a unanimous vote the other, including his own." Taft stayed on the job a little too long himself: In 1930 Louis Brandeis wrote to Felix Frankfurter that their colleague "had really lost his grip."

This wasn't merely a sad sideshow See Windows SideShow. . In some important cases--notably Bowers v. Hardwick Bowers v. Hardwick, 478 U.S. 186 (1986), was a United States Supreme Court decision that upheld the constitutionality of a Georgia sodomy law that criminalized oral and anal sex in private between consenting adults. , the infamous 1986 decision that upheld Georgia's sodomy sodomy

Noncoital carnal copulation. Sodomy is a crime in some jurisdictions. Some sodomy laws, particularly in Middle Eastern countries and those jurisdictions observing Shari'ah law, provide penalties as severe as life imprisonment for homosexual intercourse, even if the
 law--an incapacitated in·ca·pac·i·tate  
tr.v. in·ca·pac·i·tat·ed, in·ca·pac·i·tat·ing, in·ca·pac·i·tates
1. To deprive of strength or ability; disable.

2. To make legally ineligible; disqualify.
 judge (in that case, Lewis Powell) actually cast the deciding vote.

These stories, and many others like them, are related in "Mental Decrepitude de·crep·i·tude  
The quality or condition of being weakened, worn out, impaired, or broken down by old age, illness, or hard use.

Noun 1.
 on the U.S. Supreme Court," a thorough study by the historian David J. Garrow in the Fall 2000 University of Chicago Law Review The University of Chicago Law Review is a law journal published by the University of Chicago Law School, and was founded in 1933. From 1942 through 1945 the Review was published by the faculty, due to the second world war. . Garrow, 52, is best known for his books Bearing the Cross (1987), a Pulitzer-winning biography of Martin Luther King, and Liberty and Sexuality (1994), which explores the background to Roe v. Wade Roe v. Wade, case decided in 1973 by the U.S. Supreme Court. Along with Doe v. Bolton, this decision legalized abortion in the first trimester of pregnancy. . His article demonstrates in uncomfortable detail that the Supreme Court is an institution not just of laws but of men, and that since the 18th century some of those men have suffered from senility senility (sənil`ətē), deterioration of body and mind associated with old age. Indications of old age vary in the time of their appearance. , severe depression, even drug addiction. In the late 1940s, Justice Frank Murphy was hooked on Seconal and then Demerol, and "some of his closest acquaintances were convinced that the Justice was regularly purchasing illegal drugs." He was hospitalized more than once, and during his absence he instructed a colleague to cast his votes for him. In at least one case, "his" position was conjured by committee, with two justices and Murphy's clerk collaborating to invent an opinion for the phantom judge.

This year Garrow wrote "The Brains Behind Blackmun," published in the May/June Legal Affairs. From Justice Harry Blackmun's papers, Garrow uncovered the story of a judge who, in the historian's words, "ceded to his law clerks much greater control over his official work than did any of the other 15 justices from the last half-century whose papers are publicly available." Blackmun wasn't the only justice to use his clerks as a crutch crutch (kruch) a staff, ordinarily extending from the armpit to the ground, with a support for the hand and usually also for the arm or axilla; used to support the body in walking.

, but he didn't even have the excuse of mental decrepitude: As far as anyone can tell, he was perfectly capable of doing the work he gave his assistants. He just didn't want to.

Reading Garrow's articles, you get the impression of the Court as a closed society with its own customs, its members urging obviously incapable colleagues to retire but closing ranks to protect their own. Managing Editor Jesse Walker spoke with Garrow in March.

reason: What are some of the reasons people stay on the Court after their faculties begin to fail?

David J. Garrow: I think the No. 1 reason--it's not talked about much, but it's one I found quite visible in Harry Blackmun's papers--is that the justices lead such isolated lives. Almost without exception, the people with whom they are in close touch are, if not unanimously sycophantic syc·o·phant  
A servile self-seeker who attempts to win favor by flattering influential people.

[Latin s
, almost wholly uncritical towards the justice him- or herself. That is a quality of Supreme Court life that's harder to articulate than the more obvious ones, of justices convincing themselves that their constitutional insight is indispensable.

Once we understand the present Supreme Court--where each justice is entitled to four law clerks and the Court is annually deciding no more than about 80 full-fledged cases--we have to acknowledge frankly that being a justice is a very pleasant and cushy cush·y  
adj. cush·i·er, cush·i·est Informal
Making few demands; comfortable: a cushy job.

[Origin unknown.
 part-time job. You have some of the smartest people in the country helping you do your work--or, if you so choose, doing your work for you. And the Court today has significantly less work on its platter than it did 25 or 50 years ago, because the docket is completely discretionary. Back in the 1970s, they took around 150 cases a year.

Both with justices past and with at least two present members of the Court--I don't want to use names--there is every indication that they so enjoy the social stature of being a justice that they are loathe to give up the position when the minimal job performance demands can either be met rather easily or handed off.

reason: What's most striking isn't just how many times the Court has had an incapacitated justice on the bench, but the number of times the problem leaked into the press but then disappeared down the memory hole after the judge left. Why do you think that happens ?

Garrow: The great majority of people who write about the Court, both journalists and historians, look up to it in at times a frankly worshipful wor·ship·ful  
1. Given to or expressive of worship; reverent or adoring.

2. Chiefly British Used as a respectful form of address.
 way. Sad or embarrassing incidents in the Court's history tend to get overlooked or minimized.

It's quite striking to me, as a small example, that in all the coverage of the chief justice's thyroid cancer battle, there's been virtually no mention of his disability in the early '80s, his excessive dependence on pain medication for his longtime back ailment ail·ment
A physical or mental disorder, especially a mild illness.
. We had major newspaper stories back then talking about a justice slurring his comments during the argument of cases.

The underlying dynamic applies to more than just decrepitude. We've seen, for example, a dramatic increase over the last 35 or 45 years in the amount of the justices' work that is performed by their law clerks. But both among Supreme Court scholars and among journalists, there's a widely shared mind-set that that's a development that's better not discussed.

The Blackmun material certainly makes me feel that a reduction to two or, even better yet, one clerk would be highly desirable.

reason: In your research into Blackmun, did anything strike you as particularly egregious ?

Garrow: I think what's in there can be divided into two categories. In one--like that memo from Martha Matthews, the clerk in [the 1990 landmark right-to-die decision] Cruzan--Blackmun wasn't telling his clerks what his substantive views were on truly important, famous cases, and the clerks were left searching for direction. And if they weren't given any, they were going off on their own.

The second category is the expressions of overtly partisan sentiments and commentary on how things will affect the presidential election. I think everyone should acknowledge that this is absolutely improper on its face.

reason: With Rehnquist's current condition, do you think we're facing the prospect of another incapacitated judge?

Garrow: Only a minority of the news coverage has acknowledged that, back in November and December, it appears that the chief justice was not strong or energetic or sharp enough to absorb the necessary materials on all the cases which were argued. The Court itself announced that he would be voting only in cases where his vote would prove decisive. Yet at the same time, the Court continued to pretend that he was participating and voting fully in the certiorari certiorari

In law, a writ issued by a superior court for the reexamination of an action of a lower court. The writ of certiorari was originally a writ from England's Court of Queen's (King's) Bench to the judges of an inferior court; it was later expanded to include writs
 process, whereby every petition that comes in is subject to winning the votes of at least four justices to be heard.

The certiorari petitions are a major part of the Court's weekly work, but there was never any formal indication that the chief justice was not taking part 100 percent in that. But for the Court to simultaneously acknowledge that the chief justice was not capable of reading the materials and voting in all of the argued cases clearly indicated that at a minimum he was too weak physically to do all of the job.

The good news is that since January, as best we can tell, that partial participation has been replaced with a return to full participation.

reason: You propose a constitutional amendment requiring Supreme Court justices to retire by age 75.

Garrow: Yes.

reason: A lot of the justices who have been problems are younger than 75. Frank Murphy was pretty young when he had his drug trouble.

Garrow: He was under 65. And he's not the only one. Setting a mandatory retirement age, which could be done only by constitutional amendment, is no magic bullet (jargon) magic bullet - (Or "silver bullet" from vampire legends) A term widely used in software engineering for a supposed quick, simple cure for some problem. E.g. "There's no silver bullet for this problem". . But the historical record teaches us that it would solve the great majority of problems.

As a practical matter, much as I think it would be desirable for that constitutional amendment to be approved, I know that's not going to happen until another William O. Douglas situation occurs.

So are you hoping Rehnquist stays on too long, to force the issue?

Garrow: I've never been someone who slows down to look at accidents.
COPYRIGHT 2005 Reason Foundation
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2005, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion




Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:Walker, Jesse
Article Type:Interview
Geographic Code:1USA
Date:Jul 1, 2005
Previous Article:Not so Supreme: A Court Divided author Mark Tushnet explains William Rehnquist's legal legacy--and why the nation's top court matters less than you...
Next Article:The fighting Scots-Irish: they shaped America, but did they make it more free?

Related Articles
Liberty and Sexuality: The Right to Privacy and the Making of Roe v. Wade.
Pay up or zip up.
High Court anxiety.
Who should reign Supreme? reason asks libertarian legal experts: Who are your favorites--past, present, and future--on the nation's highest court?
A court in transition: with the death of Chief Justice William Rehnquist and Sandra Day O'Connor's pending retirement, the Supreme Court is about to...
The political bias of the judiciary.

Terms of use | Copyright © 2014 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters