Printer Friendly
The Free Library
14,679,288 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Supreme Court rules medical marijuana users not protected as employees.


Supreme Court Rules Medical Marijuana Users Not Protected As Employees: In a 5-2 ruling, the state Supreme Court upheld a lower court decision Jan. 31 that California's Compassionate Use compassionate use Pharmacology The use of an agent to treat Pts for whom conventional therapies have failed, or for whom no other drug exists; CU refers to the use of an agent on humanitarian grounds before it has received regulatory–FDA–approval  Act, which shields medical marijuana users against state criminal charges of drug possession, does not extend protections to employees.

U.S. Air Force veteran Gary Ross For the baseball player, see .

Gary Ross (born November 3, 1956 in Los Angeles, California) is an American writer, director and actor. He is best known for directing Pleasantville and Seabiscuit, both of which had Tobey Maguire in the lead role.
 had tried to sue Sacramento-based Raging-wire Telecommunications Inc. after it fired him for off-duty medicinal smoking. Ross, who said he was prescribed marijuana by his physician to treat chronic pain resulting from injuries sustained while serving in the Air Force, had no standing to state a claim for either disability discrimination or wrongful termination wrongful termination n. a right of an employee to sue his/her employer for damages (loss of wage and "fringe" benefits, and, if against "public policy," for punitive damages). , according to according to
prep.
1. As stated or indicated by; on the authority of: according to historians.

2. In keeping with: according to instructions.

3.
 the court's decision.

"Nothing in the text or history of the Compassionate Use Act suggests the voters intended the measure to address the respective rights and duties of employers and employees," the court ruled. "Under California law, an employer may require pre-employment drug tests and take illegal drug use into consideration in making employment decisions."

The act was intended to defend medical marijuana users against charges of drug possession. The court added that there are still no protections under federal law, which bans drug possession for medical use or other purposes.

Chris Hoffman, managing partner in the San Diego office of labor law labor law, legislation dealing with human beings in their capacity as workers or wage earners. The Industrial Revolution, by introducing the machine and factory production, greatly expanded the class of workers dependent on wages as their source of income.  firm Fisher & Phillips LLP LLP - Lower Layer Protocol , said employers often weigh safety and productivity concerns about those working with traces of the marijuana in their system with fear of wrongful termination lawsuits.

"I think this was a significant and important decision for employers," Hoffman said. "It allows them to do what's right in most decisions without having to litigate it."
COPYRIGHT 2008 CBJ, L.P.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2008 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:LAW; California. Supreme Court; California. Compassionate Use Act of 1996
Author:Chambers, Heather
Publication:San Diego Business Journal
Article Type:Brief article
Geographic Code:1U9CA
Date:Feb 11, 2008
Words:271
Previous Article:Thomas Jefferson to offer advanced degrees with international focus.(LAW)(Brief article)
Next Article:Veteran CEO comes out of second retirement to run San Marcos Bank.(FINANCE)(Frank Mercardante of San Marcos National Bank)
Topics:



Related Articles
On the Right - The Legal Jam.(Brief Article)(Column)
Oregon Court of Appeals Weighs in on Medical Marijuana and the Definition of Disability.
Employers Exhale: United States Supreme Court Medical Marijuana Decision Aids Employer Anti-Drug Programs.(Gonzales v. Raich)
Reasonable accommodation for marijuana use: are you kidding? What employees need to know.(Ross v. Ragingwire Telecommunications Inc)
Medicinal marijuana and palliative care: carving a liberty interest out of the Glucksberg framework.
Court cases/bills in the U.S. Congress.
California Employers No Longer Holding Their Breath: Applicants Using Medical Marijuana May Be Denied Employment.
California Supreme Court Affirms Employer's Ability To Terminate Employee For Off-Duty Medical Marijuana Use.
Fenwick Employment Brief - February 8, 2008.
California Supreme Court: Medicinal Marijuana Prescription Won't Protect Your Job.(California. Compassionate Use Act of 1996)(Case overview)

Terms of use | Copyright © 2009 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles