Printer Friendly
The Free Library
14,757,006 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Supreme Court limits ADA. (News).


On February 21, 2001, the U.S. Supreme Court limited the scope of the 1990 Americans with Disabilities Act Americans with Disabilities Act, U.S. civil-rights law, enacted 1990, that forbids discrimination of various sorts against persons with physical or mental handicaps.  (ADA Ada, city, United States
Ada (ā`ə), city (1990 pop. 15,820), seat of Pontotoc co., S central Okla.; inc. 1904. It is a large cattle market and the center of a rich oil and ranch area.
) in the case of University of Alabama The University of Alabama (also known as Alabama, UA or colloquially as 'Bama) is a public coeducational university located in Tuscaloosa, Alabama, USA. Founded in 1831, UA is the flagship campus of the University of Alabama System.  v. Garrett. In a narrow 5-4 decision, the Court ruled that workers employed by state or local governments alleging job discrimination can no longer sue their employers in federal court for monetary damages Monetary damages, in civil law, refers to compensation given to an injured party by a liable party. Monetary damages may be restitution, a penalty, or both.  under the ADA.

The majority ruling, written by Chief Justice William Rehnquist, held that Congress did not find enough evidence of state discrimination against people with disabilities to warrant the remedy of allowing employees to sue. However, Justice Stephen Breyer, in the dissent opinion, included a list of hundreds of cases of discrimination by state governments.

State and local governments are still required to abide by To stand to; to adhere; to maintain.

See also: Abide
 Title II of the ADA, and provide people with disabilities equal access to education, transportation, health care, and job training. But state governments can no longer be sued for monetary damages in federal court for failing to provide reasonable accommodations reasonable accommodations A standard of providing for a worker's or customer's needs, as mandated by the ADA, which requires that a business make appropriate changes in the environment to accommodate those with mental or physical disabilities as long as such  on the job.

The National MS Society will work with our partners in the disability community to explore other remedies to prevent employment discrimination by state governments. We will advocate for strong state laws that protect the rights of people with disabilities who work for state governments.

Use our Web site to join the Action Alert team. Team members receive federal alerts and updates electronically. They can e-mail elected representatives right from the site. Go to: <www.nationalmssociety.org> and click on "Advocacy". No Web access? Call 1-800-FIGHT-MS (1-800-344-4867), Option #1, and talk to your chapter.
COPYRIGHT 2001 National Multiple Sclerosis Society
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2001, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:Americans with Disabilities Act
Publication:Inside MS
Date:Jun 22, 2001
Words:262
Previous Article:Productivity.
Next Article:Confirmed: no link between hepatitis B vaccinations and MS. (News).(multiple sclerosis)
Topics:



Related Articles
Wheelchairs at third base. (Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990)
Protecting HIV-positive workers: whose ADA is it anyway? (Americans with Disabilities Act)
Worker with disability who applied for benefits can sue, court rules.
Employees lose most ADA suits, study shows. (Americans with Disabilities Act)
Judge says state's sovereign immunity intact despite ADA's mandate.
Wal-Mart found vicariously liable in ADA case.
Case involving impotence tests bounds of the ADA.
Court expands state sovereign immunity--again.
How do you spell relief? ADA, FMLA, SSA ... lawyers representing injured workers sit down to an alphabet soup of possible legal remedies. Here's how...
Supreme Court rules employer needn't rehire recovered drug user.

Terms of use | Copyright © 2009 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles