Printer Friendly
The Free Library
14,792,997 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Supreme Court holds for service in Goodyear case.


International

SUPREME COURT HOLDS FOR SERVICE IN GOODYEAR CASE

In a unanimous decision A Unanimous Decision is a winning criterion in several full-contact combat sports, such as boxing, kickboxing, Muay Thai, mixed martial arts and others sports involving striking in which all 3 judges agree on which fighter won the match.  in December 1989, the U.S. Supreme Court decided the case of Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. et al. in favor of the IRS An abbreviation for the Internal Revenue Service, a federal agency charged with the responsibility of administering and enforcing internal revenue laws. . At issue was whether U.S. or foreign legal concepts prevailed in a determination of "accumulated ac·cu·mu·late  
v. ac·cu·mu·lat·ed, ac·cu·mu·lat·ing, ac·cu·mu·lates

v.tr.
To gather or pile up; amass. See Synonyms at gather.

v.intr.
To mount up; increase.
 profits" for purposes of the section 902 foreign tax credit.

Originally, the U.S. Court of Claims had held for the IRS but, on appeal, the Federal Circuit Court found for the taxpayer. As a result, the IRS reportedly received refund claims for approximately $900 million. The Supreme Court then granted the IRS's petition for certiorari certiorari

In law, a writ issued by a superior court for the reexamination of an action of a lower court. The writ of certiorari was originally a writ from England's Court of Queen's (King's) Bench to the judges of an inferior court; it was later expanded to include writs
 and agreed with the IRS that U.S. law was controlling. (See JofA, Apr.89, page 112, and July89, page 123.)

Observation: The result in Goodyear was expected. However, the IRS was allegedly prepared to ask Congress for legislative change if the Supreme Court had upheld the federal circuit.
COPYRIGHT 1990 American Institute of CPA's
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 1990, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:Willens, Robert
Publication:Journal of Accountancy
Date:Feb 1, 1990
Words:157
Previous Article:S corporation acquisitions.
Next Article:1989 tax act.
Topics:



Related Articles
One last gasp for group fighting Hollywood redevelopment plan. (Save Hollywood Our Town taking case against the Community Redevelopment Agency to...
Duty and reliance. (accounting firms' professional liability)(Brief Article)
Wisconsin Supreme Court upholds Steven Sharp verdict.
Supreme Court Cases 1998-1999 Term.
IN THE CAPITAL.(Brief Article)
California Dental Association Wins Another Victory.(Brief Article)
U.S. District Court: ADA - Americans with Disabilities Act DISCRIMINATION.(Brief Article)
U.S. District Court: ALTERNATIVES TO CONFINEMENT.(Brief Article)
Election in the Courts.(results of presidential election in 2000 contested in court)
Eleventh Circuit revives disability bias lawsuits against states.

Terms of use | Copyright © 2010 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles