Printer Friendly
The Free Library
14,559,951 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Superior National Commences Litigation Against Foundation Health Corporation, Foundation Health Systems, Inc., and Milliman & Robertson, Inc.


Business Editors & Legal Writers

OAK PARK, Calif.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--May 1, 2000

Superior National Insurance Group, Inc. (SNTL or "Superior National") filed a lawsuit in United States United States, officially United States of America, republic (2005 est. pop. 295,734,000), 3,539,227 sq mi (9,166,598 sq km), North America. The United States is the world's third largest country in population and the fourth largest country in area.  Bankruptcy Court bankruptcy court n. the specialized Federal court in which bankruptcy matters under the Federal Bankruptcy Act are conducted. There are several bankruptcy courts in each state, and each one's territory covers several counties.  on April 28, 2000, alleging that Foundation Health Corporation ("FHC FHC Fernando Henrique Cardoso (President of Brazil, 1994-2002)
FHC Family History Center
FHC Financial Holding Company
FHC Feline Health Center (Cornell University)
FHC Fixed Head Coupe
"), Foundation Health Systems, Inc. (NYSE NYSE

See: New York Stock Exchange
:FHS FHS - Filesystem Hierarchy Standard ), and Milliman & Robertson, Inc., actuary actuary

One who calculates insurance risks and premiums. Actuaries compute the probability of the occurrence of such events as birth, marriage, illness, accidents, and death.
 for FHC's insurance subsidiaries, defrauded SNTL when in 1998 FHC sold Business Insurance Group, Inc. ("BIG") to Superior National knowing at the time of the sale that BIG was insolvent.

Superior National alleges that Milliman & Robertson, Inc. ("M&R") conspired with FHC and FHS and assisted in the execution of the fraud. Superior National's lawsuit contains seven causes of action alleging:

1.   Under the California Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act Superior
     National is entitled to void the BIG acquisition because Superior
     National did not receive reasonably equivalent value for the
     purchase price it paid for BIG and became insolvent as a result
     of the BIG acquisition.
2.   FHC, FHS, and M&R conspired and committed fraud to induce
     Superior National to purchase BIG.
3.   Superior National is entitled to rescission of the BIG
     acquisition based on the fraud committed by FHC, FHS, and M&R.
4.   Superior National is entitled to indemnification by FHC due to
     misrepresentations FHC made to SNTL regarding the adequacy of its
     reserves, the status of its accounts receivables, the financial
     health of its captive insurance companies, and the provision of
     reliable and enforceable reinsurance to guarantee BIG's reserves.
5.   FHC breached the BIG purchase agreement when it made the
     misrepresentations regarding the adequacy of its reserves, the
     status of its accounts receivables, and the financial health of
     its captive insurance companies, and the provision of reliable
     and enforceable reinsurance to guarantee BIG's reserves.
6.   FHC, FHS, and M&R committed securities fraud under the California
     Corporations Code by fraudulently misrepresenting BIG's reserve
     adequacy, the enforceability of reinsurance acquired by FHC to
     guarantee BIG's reserves, and the assets and liabilities of BIG
     as disclosed to Superior National.
7.   Superior National is entitled to recovery of the value of the
     acquisition from FHC under the United States Code due to FHC's
     bad faith.


Superior National seeks recovery from FHC, FHS, and M&R of at least $300 million in damages, rescission The abrogation of a contract, effective from its inception, thereby restoring the parties to the positions they would have occupied if no contract had ever been formed. By Agreement  of the BIG acquisition, indemnification of SNTL by FHC, FHS, and M&R from any damages suffered by SNIG due to the fraud, the return to Superior National of the $285 million that it paid FHC to acquire BIG, punitive damages Monetary compensation awarded to an injured party that goes beyond that which is necessary to compensate the individual for losses and that is intended to punish the wrongdoer. , and reimbursement of Superior National's costs associated with the lawsuit.

J. Chris Seaman SEAMAN. A sailor; a mariner; one whose business is navigation. 2 Boulay Paty, Dr. Com. 232; Code de Commerce art. 262; Laws of Oleron, art. 7; Laws of Wishuy, art. 19. The term seamen, in it most enlarged sense, includes the captain a well as other persons of the crew; in a more confined , Superior National's President and Chief Executive Officer, stated, "Superior National believes the plain language of the California Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act alone results in the voiding of the BIG acquisition, let alone the six other causes of action alleged in the lawsuit. Foundation Health Systems issued a press release on April 27, 2000, in which it attempted to offer several anticipatory defenses to Superior National's lawsuit, none of which were relevant with respect to Superior National's right to void the contract under the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act."

Mr. Seaman further stated, "The filing of the lawsuit in U.S. Bankruptcy Court should significantly accelerate the disposition of this action, as litigation An action brought in court to enforce a particular right. The act or process of bringing a lawsuit in and of itself; a judicial contest; any dispute.

When a person begins a civil lawsuit, the person enters into a process called litigation.
 in Bankruptcy Court could conceivably be resolved within the next twelve to eighteen months versus three to five years in the California state courts. Superior National intends to exact rescission of the BIG acquisition and damages, which would entail the return of the $285 million that Superior National paid for BIG and its insolvent insurance subsidiaries, at least $300 million of compensation for the considerable damages Superior National has suffered as a result of the California Department of Insurance The California Department of Insurance (CDI), established in 1868, is the angency charged with overseeing the regulation of insurance regulations, enforcing statutes mandating consumer protections, educating consumers, and fostering the stability of insurance markets in the state  conservation of Superior National's insurance subsidiaries, and indemnification for any claims or damages that might be asserted by other parties."

Superior National previously announced that it sought Chapter 11 protection in a petition filed on April 26, 2000, and on March 3, 2000 announced that the California Department of Insurance seized the assets and operations of Superior National's four California domiciled dom·i·cile  
n.
1. A residence; a home.

2. One's legal residence.

v. dom·i·ciled, dom·i·cil·ing, dom·i·ciles

v.tr.
1.
 insurance subsidiaries.
COPYRIGHT 2000 Business Wire
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2000, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Publication:Business Wire
Date:May 1, 2000
Words:680
Previous Article:Micronetics Wireless Adds New Executives in Sales, Engineering and Manufacturing.
Next Article:CSG Systems, Inc. and DIVA Deliver Completely Integrated Billing Solutions For Video-On-Demand.
Topics:



Related Articles
Much-touted report on health care costs is actually a figment of reality. (Milliman and Robertson Inc.'s report)
New market forces are special challenge to academic health centers.(Health Care Marketplace)
Penn Plaza lease Studley brokers.(Milliman & Robertson, Inc., )(Brief Article)
Physicians Lead the Way at America's Top Hospitals.
SUPERIOR WILL SUE FHS AFFILIATE.(Business)
FHS RAISES PRICES, PROFITS.(Business)
BICO ENTITY TO BE SOLD BY SUPERIOR.(BUSINESS)
INVESTORS BOOST STOCK OF FHS; SHARES UP 19% AS DEAL EMERGES.(BUSINESS)
Giving, and Taking Away: A controversy at Princeton offers broad lessons.(Robertson Foundation lawsuit)
Utilization review and managed health care liability.(Review Article)

Terms of use | Copyright © 2009 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles