Summary Notice of Pendency and Settlement of Class Action Against Signal Technology Corp., Posted by Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP and Robert C. Susser, P.C.Business Editors NEW YORK--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Feb. 29, 2000 The following is an announcement by the law firm of Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP LLP - Lower Layer Protocol and Robert C. Susser, P.C. Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP and Robert C. Susser, P.C. post this notice to all persons or entities who purchased or acquired common stock of Signal Technology Corp. (Symbol: STZ STZ Steinbeis-Transferzentrum STZ Streptozotocin ) from April 28, 1997 through August 17, 1998, inclusive (the "Class"). This Summary Notice is given pursuant to Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (FRCP) are rules governing civil procedure in United States district (federal) courts, that is, court procedures for civil suits. The FRCP are promulgated by the United States Supreme Court pursuant to the Rules Enabling Act, and then approved and an Order by the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts The United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts is the Federal district court whose jurisdiction is the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. The first court session was held in Boston in 1789. (the "Court"), dated January 21, 2000. The purpose of this Notice is to inform you of the proposed $1,250,000 settlement that has been reached in this Class Action (the "Action") by Lead Plaintiffs with defendants Signal Technology Corp. and Dale L. Peterson (collectively, the "Defendants"). The proposed settlement resolves all claims, rights, causes of action, suits, matters and issues, whether known or unknown arising out of or related to the subject matter of the Action or claims asserted by or on behalf of plaintiffs or any member of the Class, whether individual, class, derivative, representative, legal, equitable or any other type or in any other capacity, against any one of the foregoing parties. The settlement consideration consists of $1,250,000, in cash, plus accrued interest Accrued Interest The interest that has accumulated on a bond since the last interest payment up to but not including the settlement date. There are two methods for calculating accrued interest: 1) 360-day year method, used for corporate and municipal bonds. . (A summary of the settlement and related matters are more fully described in the detailed Notice of Pendency Pend´en`cy n. 1. The quality or state of being pendent or suspended. 2. The quality or state of being undecided, or in continuance; suspense; as, the pendency of a suit s>. of Class Action, Hearing On Proposed Settlement And Attorneys' Fee Petition, And Right To Share In Settlement Fund (the "Detailed Notice")). A hearing will be held by the Court on April 24, 2000 at 2:00p.m., before the Honorable Edward F. Harrington in the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts, United States United States, officially United States of America, republic (2005 est. pop. 295,734,000), 3,539,227 sq mi (9,166,598 sq km), North America. The United States is the world's third largest country in population and the fourth largest country in area. Courthouse, One Courthouse Way, Court Room 19, Boston, Massachusetts “Boston” redirects here. For other uses, see Boston (disambiguation). Boston is the capital and most populous city of Massachusetts.[3] The largest city in New England, Boston is considered the unofficial economic and cultural center of the entire New 02210. The purpose of the hearing will be, among other things: (1) to determine whether the proposed settlement is fair, reasonable, and adequate and should be approved and, therefore, whether this class action should be dismissed on the merits on the merits adj. referring to a judgment, decision or ruling of a court based upon the facts presented in evidence and the law applied to that evidence. A judge decides a case "on the merits" when he/she bases the decision on the fundamental issues and considers and with prejudice and without costs as to the Defendants; and (2) to consider the reasonableness of an application of plaintiffs' counsel for the payment of attorneys' fees and reimbursement of expenses incurred in prosecuting the Action. If you purchased or otherwise acquired Signal Technology common stock between April 28, 1997 and August 17, 1998, inclusive, you are a Class member. Your rights against the Released Parties (as defined in the Detailed Notice) will be affected by this Settlement. In particular, if you wish to share in the $1,250,000 settlement, you must file a valid claim, on a Proof of Claim form, no later than May 22, 2000 establishing that you are entitled to recovery. PLEASE NOTE: IF YOU FAIL TO FILE A PROPER PROOF OF CLAIM FORM, YOU WILL NOT SHARE IN THE SETTLEMENT BUT YOU WILL BE BOUND BY THE FINAL JUDGMENT OF THE COURT. If you have not already received a copy of the Detailed Notice, or a copy of the Proof of Claim, you may obtain such information by contacting the Settlement Administrator at: Decoursey v. Signal Technology Corp. c/o FRG Information Systems Corp. P.O. Box 4059, Grand Central Station New York New York, state, United States New York, Middle Atlantic state of the United States. It is bordered by Vermont, Massachusetts, Connecticut, and the Atlantic Ocean (E), New Jersey and Pennsylvania (S), Lakes Erie and Ontario and the Canadian province of , New York 10163 For additional information about this settlement, please contact Stacey J. Dana, Esq. at Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP. at FaruqiLaw@aol.com or Robert C. Susser, Esq. at Robert C. Susser, P.C. at ClassAction@mail.com. Please do not contact the Court or the Clerk's office for information. |
|
||||||||||||||

Printer friendly
Cite/link
Email
Feedback
Reader Opinion