Stull, Stull & Brody Announces Class Action against Watson Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Business Editors/Legal Writers NEW YORK--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Dec. 4, 2003 Notice is hereby given that a class action lawsuit class action lawsuit A lawsuit in which one party or a limited number of parties sue on behalf of a larger group to which the parties belong. For example, investors may bring a class action lawsuit against a brokerage firm that has actively promoted a tax was filed on December 2, 2003, in the United States District Court United States District Court In the U.S., any of the 94 trial courts of general jurisdiction in the federal judicial system. Each state, as well as the District of Columbia and the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, has at least one federal district court. for the Central District of California, on behalf of all persons who purchased common stock of Watson Pharmaceuticals Watson Pharmaceuticals, Incorporated (NYSE: WPI) is the 5th largest pharmaceutical company in the United States based on number of prescriptions dispensed. Based in Corona, California, Watson's Generics division markets over 150 pharmaceutical product families, including one of the , Inc. ("Watson") (NYSE NYSE See: New York Stock Exchange :WPI WPI - Worcester Polytechnic Institute ) between November 2, 1999 and November 13, 2001, inclusive (the "Class Period") against Watson and certain of its officers and directors. The complaint alleges that defendants violated Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and Rule 10b-5 promulgated prom·ul·gate tr.v. prom·ul·gat·ed, prom·ul·gat·ing, prom·ul·gates 1. To make known (a decree, for example) by public declaration; announce officially. See Synonyms at announce. 2. thereunder, by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market between November 2, 1999 and November 13, 2001, thereby artificially inflating the price of Watson common stock. In particular, the Complaint alleges that defendants' statements were materially false and misleading because they failed to disclose and misrepresented the following material facts: (a) that Watson was materially overstating its financial results by failing to write down the value of its inventories and the value of certain of the Company's assets; (b) that Watson was experiencing significantly increased competition for generic drugs generic drug, a drug sold or prescribed under the nonproprietary name of its active ingredients or under a generally descriptive name rather than under a brand or trade name. and was also experiencing manufacturing difficulties; and (c) that based on the foregoing, defendants' positive statements about the Company were lacking in a reasonable basis at all times and were therefore materially false and misleading. Prior to the disclosure of the true facts about the Company, defendants used millions of shares of Watson common stock to acquire other businesses. On November 13, 2001, Watson shocked the market when it announced its financial results for third quarter 2001 which were well below expectations. Furthermore, the Company announced that it was writing off almost all of its investment in Dilacor XR and that the Company was writing off over $20 million in additional impaired inventory. In response to this negative announcement, the price of Watson common stock plummeted, trading down almost $20 per share, to close trading at $28.54 per share, compared to the prior day's close of $47.15 per share, on tremendous volume of over 15.3 million shares traded - almost 20 times the average trading volume Trading volume The number of shares transacted every day. As there is a seller for every buyer, one can think of the trading volume as half of the number of shares transacted. That is, if A sells 100 shares to B, the volume is 100 shares. for Watson shares. Plaintiff seeks to recover damages on behalf of class members and is represented by, among others, the law firm of Stull, Stull & Brody. Stull, Stull & Brody has litigated many class actions for violations of securities laws in federal courts over the past 30 years and has obtained court approval of substantial settlements on numerous occasions. If you acquired Watson common stock between November 2, 1999 and November 13, 2001, you may, no later than January 12, 2004, request the Court appoint you as lead plaintiff. A lead plaintiff is a representative party that acts on behalf of other class members in directing the litigation An action brought in court to enforce a particular right. The act or process of bringing a lawsuit in and of itself; a judicial contest; any dispute. When a person begins a civil lawsuit, the person enters into a process called litigation. . In order to be appointed lead plaintiff, the Court must determine that the class member's claim is typical of the claims of other class members, and that the class member will adequately represent the class. Under certain circumstances, one or more class members may together serve as "lead plaintiff." Your ability to share in any recovery is not, however, affected by the decision whether or not to serve as a lead plaintiff. You may retain Stull, Stull & Brody, or other counsel of your choice, to serve as your counsel in this action. If you wish to discuss this action or have any questions concerning this notice or your rights or interests with respect to these matters, please contact Tzivia Brody, Esq. at Stull, Stull & Brody by calling toll-free 1-800-337-4983, or by e-mail at SSBNY@aol.com, or by fax at 212/490-2022, or by writing to Stull, Stull & Brody, 6 East 45th Street, New York New York, state, United States New York, Middle Atlantic state of the United States. It is bordered by Vermont, Massachusetts, Connecticut, and the Atlantic Ocean (E), New Jersey and Pennsylvania (S), Lakes Erie and Ontario and the Canadian province of , NY 10017. |
|
||||||||||||||||

Printer friendly
Cite/link
Email
Feedback
Reader Opinion