Study: low marks for direct instruction.Despite the common perception of the direct instruction concept's success in reading education, results from a University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee professor's three-year study may make administrators reconsider re·con·sid·er v. re·con·sid·ered, re·con·sid·er·ing, re·con·sid·ers v.tr. 1. To consider again, especially with intent to alter or modify a previous decision. 2. that belief. Yet, the study itself has caused quite a stir. It examined urban and suburban schools in Wisconsin Wisconsin, state, United States Wisconsin (wĭskŏn`sən, –sĭn), upper midwestern state of the United States. It is bounded by Lake Superior and the Upper Peninsula of Michigan, from which it is divided by the Menominee where some teachers were using SRA/McGraw-Hill's Reading Mastery, a reading curriculum that advances the direct instruction approach. Students receiving SRA's Direct Instruction scored significantly lower on standardized tests A standardized test is a test administered and scored in a standard manner. The tests are designed in such a way that the "questions, conditions for administering, scoring procedures, and interpretations are consistent" [1] in overall reading achievement and in comprehension comprehension Act of or capacity for grasping with the intellect. The term is most often used in connection with tests of reading skills and language abilities, though other abilities (e.g., mathematical reasoning) may also be examined. than students receiving more traditional instruction, the report found. Teacher interviews revealed a belief that DI should be limited in its use. Urban teachers report DI texts disregard their students' lack of exposure to life occurrences that are more common for middle-class suburban students. Suburban teachers say DI is worthwhile as a corrective cor·rec·tive adj. Counteracting or modifying what is malfunctioning, undesirable, or injurious. n. An agent that corrects. corrective, n and supplementary reading program. "The study suggests that DI is not the single best approach for all students.... There may be advantages for [using it] with very select types of students, [such as] certain learning-disabled children," says Randall Ryder, the professor of curriculum and instruction at UW-M UW-M University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee who led the study. He suggests administrators whose districts use DI compare program results to results of past programs. For those considering adoption, he recommends getting student feedback on samples first. Districts should also form ongoing reading committees that include teachers, so they have input on program decisions. The study's design has been questioned by DI's founder, Siegfried Engelmann, and others, including Gary Adams of Educational Achievement Systems, who reviews educational research claims, and Sara G. Tarver, a University of Wisconsin-Madison “University of Wisconsin” redirects here. For other uses, see University of Wisconsin (disambiguation). A public, land-grant institution, UW-Madison offers a wide spectrum of liberal arts studies, professional programs, and student activities. professor of education. One cited flaw is that none of the study's teachers use strict DI, and those who use a mixed approach were placed in the DI sample group. For a copy of the report, e-mail Ryder, Randall@uwm.edu. Adams' review of the study can be found at www.edresearch.com. |
|
||||||||||||||||
Printer friendly
Cite/link
Email
Feedback
Reader Opinion