Printer Friendly
The Free Library
14,528,975 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Stellar schools? not so fast.


From Florida to California, schools have been given state awards for excellence and even praised by President Bush over the past few years.

But many administrators are still frustrated frus·trate  
tr.v. frus·trat·ed, frus·trat·ing, frus·trates
1.
a. To prevent from accomplishing a purpose or fulfilling a desire; thwart:
. Ironically, many of those otherwise stellar schools do not meet federal guidelines guidelines,
n.pl a set of standards, criteria, or specifications to be used or followed in the performance of certain tasks.
 for showing adequate yearly progress Adequate Yearly Progress, or AYP, is a measurement defined by the United States federal No Child Left Behind Act that allows the U.S. Department of Education to determine how every public school and school district in the country is performing academically.  in state accountability tests according to according to
prep.
1. As stated or indicated by; on the authority of: according to historians.

2. In keeping with: according to instructions.

3.
 No Child Left Behind. And some are even getting "F" grades on their school report cards.

The U.S. Department of Education claims this discrepancy is due to the fact that many schools base their scores on averages, instead of disaggregating data. "On average, the school is doing well but not all kids are learning what they should be learning," says Jo Ann Webb, a spokeswoman for the education department.

And while these schools are doing a good job in educating most students, they still have weak spots that need to be corrected, she adds. "I don't think a school that ... did not make AYP AYP Adequate Yearly Progress (National Assessment of Educational Progress)
AYP Anarchist Yellow Pages
AYP American Youth Philharmonic
 should beat itself up. It simply means there are areas for improvement and growth."
COPYRIGHT 2004 Professional Media Group LLC
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2004, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:Inside the law: analyzing, debating and explaining no child left behind
Author:Pascopella, Angela
Publication:District Administration
Geographic Code:1USA
Date:Jun 1, 2004
Words:171
Previous Article:Signs of improvement with SES.(Inside the law: analyzing, debating and explaining no child left behind)(Supplemental Education Services)
Next Article:What a difference four months makes.(Inside the law: analyzing, debating and explaining no child left behind)
Topics:



Related Articles
Software for hard data: it can be difficult to transform the mountains of data school leaders are faced with into valuable information. Quality...
Another month, another change.(Inside the law: analyzing, debating and explaining no child left behind)
Report: NCLB fails.(Inside the law: analyzing, debating and explaining No Child Left Behind)
Tutor successes.(Inside the law: analyzing, debating and explaining No Child Left Behind)
The federalism debate.(Federal Dateline)
The comeback kid.(Inside the law: analyzing, debating and explaining No Child Left Behind)
Airing out old concerns.(Inside the law: analyzing, debating and explaining no child left behind)
NCLB basics.(Inside the law: analyzing, debating and explaining No Child Left Behind)(Brief Article)
Middle and high lows.(Inside the law: analyzing, debating and explaining No Child Left Behind)
Solid foundation = strong standards.(Inside the law: analyzing, debating and explaining No Child Left Behind)

Terms of use | Copyright © 2009 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles