Printer Friendly
The Free Library
14,702,759 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

State funding lawsuits could hit NCLB next.


Adequacy funding lawsuits have been around for years. But No Child Left Behind's demands appear to be driving more of them.

"In the last couple of years, there has been an increase in litigation An action brought in court to enforce a particular right. The act or process of bringing a lawsuit in and of itself; a judicial contest; any dispute.

When a person begins a civil lawsuit, the person enters into a process called litigation.
, and it will continue," says Steve Smith, education analyst at the National Conference of State Legislatures
The abbreviation NCSL redirects here. For the British educational institution see National College for School Leadership.


The National Conference of State Legislatures
. "I think it's a trend and, with the two-year adequate yearly progress Adequate Yearly Progress, or AYP, is a measurement defined by the United States federal No Child Left Behind Act that allows the U.S. Department of Education to determine how every public school and school district in the country is performing academically.  results under [NCLB NCLB No Child Left Behind (US education initiative) ], if schools don't meet AYP AYP Adequate Yearly Progress (National Assessment of Educational Progress)
AYP Anarchist Yellow Pages
AYP American Youth Philharmonic
 after two years in a row, they will require technical assistance."

Of the 25 states in school finance litigation now, "they all at least indirectly deal with No Child Left Behind. They're saying the system is inadequate" to meet the law's demands, Smith says.

Adequacy lawsuits, which mainly come from poor and disadvantaged districts, were first brought to federal courts in the late 1960s on grounds of inadequate funding. Lawsuits then shifted to fight for equity, or the amount of money spent on one group of students compared to another.

Following the 1983 release of A Nation at Risk, which lambasted American education, the nation's schools embraced standards-based reform, Smith says. Now, the plaintiffs, or districts, have a 70 percent success rate, with more states losing lawsuits.

Smith foresees more subgroups, such as special education students, suing. "The state has to remedy the situation and that often requires an increase in funding and an overhaul of education, such as in curriculum or teachers' salaries ... What we're finding, is that simply increasing funding will not improve student performance. The devil lies in the details: how states target resources."

The Campaign for Fiscal Equity The Campaign for Fiscal Equity (CFE), a not-for-profit organization based in New York City, is a coalition of parent organizations, community school boards and advocacy groups seeking to reform New York State's school finance system to ensure adequate funding of education in New  agrees. Molly Hunter, director of legal research at CFE CFE Conventional Forces in Europe (treaty)
CFE Cash Flow to Equity (finance/accounting)
CFE Comisión Federal de Electricidad (México)
CFE Certified Fraud Examiner
, says putting money into qualified teachers, preschool programs, early literacy programs and small class sizes in early grades have shown to make "a tremendous difference."

Students in small class sizes in the early grades have been shown to achieve more through high school with lower drop-out rates, according to studies in Kentucky, Vermont and New Jersey.
COPYRIGHT 2004 Professional Media Group LLC
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2004, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:Inside the law: analyzing, debating and explaining No Child Left Behind
Publication:District Administration
Geographic Code:1USA
Date:Aug 1, 2004
Words:327
Previous Article:New England's bold test: multi-state assessments.(Inside the law: analyzing, debating and explaining No Child Left Behind)
Next Article:Report: NCLB fails.(Inside the law: analyzing, debating and explaining No Child Left Behind)
Topics:



Related Articles
No child brings every lawyer out. (Inside the law: analyzing, debating and explaining no child left behind).(No Child Left Behind Act cases )(Brief...
The federalism debate.(Federal Dateline)
How the south was lost.(Inside the law: analyzing, debating and explaining No Child Left Behind)
Is pay-off a political punching bag?(Inside the law: analyzing, debating and explaining No Child Left Behind)
Timeline of a waiver request: how one set of questions from Connecticut set off a volley of name-calling and a potential lawsuit that have thrust...
NCLB & IDEA make room for creative learning tools and alternate approaches: federal mandates alert educators of a shift from process to student...
Utah bucks "No Child Left Behind": Utah has passed legislation to maintain its constitutional primacy over the federal government in the education of...
Tread on me--but lightly: the era of big government is complicated.(evaluation of No Child Left Behind Act of 2001)
The future of NCLB.(No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, educational accountability)
NEA sues over NCLB: the bucks are big, but the case is weak.(National Education Association sues Margaret Spellings alleging federal funding...

Terms of use | Copyright © 2009 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles