Printer Friendly
The Free Library
5,677,878 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Standards.


44.  Standards

U.S. District Court   Armstrong v. Metropolitan Government of
                      Nashville, 196 F.Supp.2d 673 (M.D.Tenn. 2002).
  PROFESSIONAL        Inmates and pretrial detainees brought a class
  STANDARDS           action against a metropolitan government in 1987,
                      alleging that overcrowding in jails was
  ACCREDITATION       unsanitary and unsafe. The district court issued
                      an injunction and set population caps. The
                      district court granted the government's motion to
                      lift the injunction in 2002, finding that
                      conditions in new jails met the requirements of
                      the Eighth Amendment. The court found that the
                      new jails' environment, sanitation and fire
                      safety complied with the Eighth Amendment,
                      providing adequate levels of personal security
                      for inmates and staff. The court held that food
                      service was adequate and acceptable and that
                      there was adequate physical space available for
                      recreation. The court noted that two of the four
                      jails had achieved accreditation by the American
                      Correctional Association and the other two had
                      applied, and would also probably receive
                      accreditation. The court called the jail
                      administration at the time of the 1987 suit "a
                      brutal and corrupt regime" The court praised the
                      government's correctional experts who assisted
                      the county, and the plaintiffs' counsel "for the
                      enormous service she has performed for the class
                      of plaintiffs and the community." The court
                      complimented the Special Master for his "wise
                      guidance in overseeing the rehabilitation of the
                      Metropolitan Government's jail system."
                      (Metropolitan Government of Nashville, Tennessee)
COPYRIGHT 2002 CRS, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2002, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:jail overcrowding
Publication:Corrections Caselaw Quarterly
Geographic Code:1U6TN
Date:Nov 1, 2002
Words:232
Previous Article:Sentence.(Brief Article)
Next Article:Supervision.(Calderon-Ortiz v. Laboy-Alvarado)(Brief Article)
Topics:



Related Articles
U.S. District Court: CROWDING CONDITIONS MEDICAL CARE.(prisoners and prisons)(Brief Article)
U.S. District Court: STATE REGULATIONS.(prisoners and prisons)(Brief Article)
U.S. Appeals Court: PLRA-Prison Litigation Reform Act CONSENT DECREE-TERMINATION.(prisoners and prisons)(Brief Article)
U.S. Appeals Court: CONDITIONS CROWDING.(prisoners and prisons)(Brief Article)
U.S. district court: crowding sanitation medical care ventilation.(Conditions of Confinement)
Foster v. Fulton County, Georgia.(conditions of confinement, prison administration lawsuit)
Foster v. Fulton County, Georgia.(prisoners complains conditions of confinement and inadequate medical care)
Foster v. Fulton County, Georgia.(conditions of confinement and inadequate medical care)
Brown v. Mitchell.(violation of United States Constitution. 8th Amendment)(Brief Article)
Brown v. Mitchell.(jail mismanagement case)(Brief Article)

Terms of use | Copyright © 2009 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles