Standards.
44. Standards
U.S. District Court Armstrong v. Metropolitan Government of
Nashville, 196 F.Supp.2d 673 (M.D.Tenn. 2002).
PROFESSIONAL Inmates and pretrial detainees brought a class
STANDARDS action against a metropolitan government in 1987,
alleging that overcrowding in jails was
ACCREDITATION unsanitary and unsafe. The district court issued
an injunction and set population caps. The
district court granted the government's motion to
lift the injunction in 2002, finding that
conditions in new jails met the requirements of
the Eighth Amendment. The court found that the
new jails' environment, sanitation and fire
safety complied with the Eighth Amendment,
providing adequate levels of personal security
for inmates and staff. The court held that food
service was adequate and acceptable and that
there was adequate physical space available for
recreation. The court noted that two of the four
jails had achieved accreditation by the American
Correctional Association and the other two had
applied, and would also probably receive
accreditation. The court called the jail
administration at the time of the 1987 suit "a
brutal and corrupt regime" The court praised the
government's correctional experts who assisted
the county, and the plaintiffs' counsel "for the
enormous service she has performed for the class
of plaintiffs and the community." The court
complimented the Special Master for his "wise
guidance in overseeing the rehabilitation of the
Metropolitan Government's jail system."
(Metropolitan Government of Nashville, Tennessee)
COPYRIGHT 2002 CRS, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2002, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.
|
Reader Opinion