Printer Friendly
The Free Library
14,507,670 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Spiegla v. Hull.


U.S. Appeals Court

FREE SPEECH

RETALIATION RETALIATION. The act by which a nation or individual treats another in the same manner that the latter has treated them. For example, if a nation should lay a very heavy tariff on American goods, the United States would be justified in return in laying heavy duties on the manufactures and  

SCHEDULE

Spiegla v. Hull, 371 F.3d 928 (7th Cir. 2004). A state prison employee sued prison officials under [section] 1983 alleging that they changed her shift schedule and post assignment in retaliation for her exercise of her free speech rights. The district court entered summary judgment for the officials and the employee appealed. The appeals court reversed and remanded, finding that the employee's speech concerning alleged official misconduct official misconduct n. improper and/or illegal acts by a public official which violate his/her duty to follow the law and act on behalf of the public good. Often such conduct is under the guise or "color" of official authority. (See: official)  was made as a private citizen on a matter of public concern, and she demonstrated that her comments were the substantial or motivating factor in her transfer and shift change. The employee's comments addressed her direct observations of prison officials engaged in an activity that was consistent with contraband contraband, in international law, goods necessary or useful in the prosecution of war that a belligerent may lawfully seize from a neutral who is attempting to deliver them to the enemy.  trafficking, in violation of state law, at a facility that had a history of problems with contraband. The court noted that her transfer came only four days after her comments, after seven years of uninterrupted postings on prison gates, and that another prison official admitted he was angry with the employee for her comments. (Westville Correctional Facility The Westville Correctional Facility, located in Westville, Indiana, is a state-operated prison for adult males. The facility contains sections of three levels of security. [1] The average daily population in September 2006 was approximately 3,100. , Indiana Indiana, state, United States
Indiana, midwestern state in the N central United States. It is bordered by Lake Michigan and the state of Michigan (N), Ohio (E), Kentucky, across the Ohio R. (S), and Illinois (W).
)
COPYRIGHT 2004 CRS, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2004, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:prison employee sues prison officials for retaliation for her free speech rights
Publication:Corrections Caselaw Quarterly
Article Type:Brief Article
Geographic Code:1U3IN
Date:Aug 1, 2004
Words:183
Previous Article:Piscottano v. Murphy.(state corrections officers sues prison officials)(Brief Article)
Next Article:Hammond v. Gordon County.(female inmates alleges male officers of violating their Eighth Amendment rights)
Topics:



Related Articles
U.S. Appeals Court: DISCIPLINE.(Brief Article)
Gayle v. Gonyea.(DISCIPLINE)(Brief Article)
Akridge v. Wilkinson.(Brief Article)
Vantassel v. Brooks.(lex talionis claim)(Brief Article)
Allen v. Iranon.(PERSONNEL)(case regarding public comments)(Brief Article)
Purkey v. CCA Detention Center.(ACCESS TO COURT)
Personnel.(Barstow v. Shea)(Getz v. Board)(Corrections, Gorski v. New Hampshire Dept. of)
Searches.(Dye v. Lomen)(Farid v. Goord)(Saulsberry v. Arpaio)
McElroy v. Lopac.(FREE SPEECH, EXPRESSION, AND ASSOCIATION)(Brief Article)
Lashley v. Wakefield.(GRIEVANCE PROCEDURES, PRISONER)(Brief Article)

Terms of use | Copyright © 2009 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles