Printer Friendly
The Free Library
14,716,498 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Sorry, wrong number: truly roving wiretaps.


HAVE THE FEDS been snooping on you by mistake? That was the specter raised by a September 2005 report from the Justice Department's inspector general, which found that an undisclosed number of monitored telecommunications picked up conversations between people who were not remotely under suspicion.

Under the PATRIOT Act Patriot Act: see USA PATRIOT Act. , the FBI has unprecedented authority to eavesdrop eaves·drop  
intr.v. eaves·dropped, eaves·drop·ping, eaves·drops
To listen secretly to the private conversation of others.
 on all phone and Internet communications of individual American citizens, as long as agents obtain approval from a secret court. In 2004, 1,745 such warrants were issued. DOJ (Department Of Justice) The legal arm of the U.S. government that represents the public interest of the United States. It is headed by the Attorney General.  Inspector General Glenn Fine zeroed in on the backlog of untranslated foreign-language conversations--38,514 hours' worth, or about 4-4 years of recordings--and found that an unspecified number were "collections of materials from the wrong sources due to technical problems" Neither Fine nor the FBI would say what percentage of taps were erroneous, and both blamed the mistakes on phone companies. According to according to
prep.
1. As stated or indicated by; on the authority of: according to historians.

2. In keeping with: according to instructions.

3.
 law, the FBI has to report the wrong numbers to the secret court that authorized the warrant, and it can't build a new investigation on the ill-gotten data.

The roving wiretap authorization was one of the few provisions in the original PATRIOT Act that was not made permanent last summer. The House of Representatives' version of the act's reauthorization has the wiretap wiretap n. using an electronic device to listen in on telephone lines, which is illegal unless allowed by court order based upon a showing by law enforcement of "probable cause" to believe the communications are part of criminal activities.  power expiring after 10 years, while the Senate gives it just four.
COPYRIGHT 2006 Reason Foundation
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2006, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001
Author:Welch, Matt
Publication:Reason
Article Type:Brief Article
Geographic Code:1USA
Date:Jan 1, 2006
Words:221
Previous Article:Correction.(Correction Notice)
Next Article:Don't ask, yet: gays in combat.(Citings)(Brief Article)
Topics:



Related Articles
Are companies unwittingly supporting terrorism? (Charity).(charitable donations)
Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act: before and after the USA Patriot Act. (Legal Digest).
Civil liberties.(Hill Bulletin)(Brief Article)
Press conference bars press.(No Comment)
U.S. cities, states fight PATRIOT Act.(Up front: news, trends and analysis)
PATRIOT act's reach expanded despite part being struck down.(Up front: news, trends & analysis)
You've got mail (and AOL can read it).(Up front: news, trends & analysis)
E-mail intercept violates wiretap law, First Circuit holds.
New online service helps firms comply with the Patriot Act.(TECHNOLOGY)

Terms of use | Copyright © 2009 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles