Printer Friendly
The Free Library
14,715,855 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Some contested liability trusts now listed transactions.


The IRS's and Treasury's recent actions have shown their dedication to combating perceived abusive Tending to deceive; practicing abuse; prone to ill-treat by coarse, insulting words or harmful acts. Using ill treatment; injurious, improper, hurtful, offensive, reproachful.  tax-avoidance transactions. In November 2003, the IRS An abbreviation for the Internal Revenue Service, a federal agency charged with the responsibility of administering and enforcing internal revenue laws.  issued Notice 2003-77 (later revised), identifying as listed transaction certain trusts created to accelerate deductions for contested liabilities. In conjunction, Treasury and the IRS issued temporary and proposed regulations limiting a taxpayer's ability to deduct de·duct  
v. de·duct·ed, de·duct·ing, de·ducts

v.tr.
1. To take away (a quantity) from another; subtract.

2. To derive by deduction; deduce.

v.intr.
 contested liabilities under Sec. 461(f) before the resolution of the contest.

Overview

The Service issued Notice 2003-77 after discovering transactions in which taxpayers created trusts claiming to qualify under Sec. 461(f). The notice states that transactions that are the same as, or substantially similar to, the following five transactions are "listed transactions" for purposes of Regs. Sees. 1.6011-4(b)(2) (disclosure requirements), 301.6111-2(b)(2) (registration requirements) and 301.6112-1(b)(2) (list maintenance requirements):

1. Transactions in which a taxpayer transfers money or other property to a trust that purportedly pur·port·ed  
adj.
Assumed to be such; supposed: the purported author of the story.



pur·port
 satisfies Sec. 461(f), to provide for the satisfaction of an asserted liability, and retains certain powers over the money or other property transferred;

2. Transactions in which a taxpayer transfers its debt or promise to provide services or property in the future to a trust that supposedly satisfies Sec. 461(f), to provide for the satisfaction of an asserted liability;

3. Transactions in which an accrual-method taxpayer transfers money or other property to a trust that purportedly satisfies Sec. 461(f), to provide for the satisfaction of a workers' compensation workers' compensation, payment by employers for some part of the cost of injuries, or in some cases of occupational diseases, received by employees in the course of their work.  or tort tort, in law, the violation of some duty clearly set by law, not by a specific agreement between two parties, as in breach of contract. When such a duty is breached, the injured party has the right to institute suit for compensatory damages.  liability;

4. Transactions in which an accrual-method taxpayer transfers money or other property in tax years beginning after 1991 to a mist that supposedly satisfies Sec. 461(f), to provide for the satisfaction of a liability for which payment is economic performance under Regs. Sec. 1.461-4(g), other than a liability for workers' compensation or tort; and

5. Transactions in which a taxpayer transfers its stock, or stock or debt of a related party (as defined in Sec. 267(b)), after Nov. 18, 2003, to a trust that purportedly satisfies Sec. 461 (f), to provide for the satisfaction of any asserted liability.

For items 3 and 4 above, the notice provides exceptions (1) for trusts to which the liability is owed or (2) when payment to the trust discharges the taxpayer's liability to the claimant CLAIMANT. In the courts of admiralty, when the suit is in rem, the cause is entitled in the Dame of the libellant against the thing libelled, as A B v. Ten cases of calico and it preserves that title through the whole progress of the suit. .

Sec. 461(f) allows a taxpayer to deduct a contested liability in a year before resolution of the contest if:

1. The taxpayer disputes a claimed liability;

2. It transfers money or other property to satisfy the claimed liability;

3. The dispute exists after the transfer; and

4. But for the fact that the claimed liability is disputed, a deduction deduction, in logic, form of inference such that the conclusion must be true if the premises are true. For example, if we know that all men have two legs and that John is a man, it is then logical to deduce that John has two legs.  would be allowed for the tax year of the transfer (or for an earlier tax year) determined after the application of Sec. 461(h) (the economic performance rules).

A taxpayer meeting these requirements can take a deduction for the liability in the tax year of the transfer. The previous version of Kegs. Sec. 1.461-1(c)(1) included conditions required to meet Sec. 461(f). In the temporary regulations, the IRS and Treasury have removed Regs. Sec. 1.461-1(c)(1) and replaced it with clearer guidelines guidelines,
n.pl a set of standards, criteria, or specifications to be used or followed in the performance of certain tasks.
; see Temp. Regs. Sec. 1.461-2T(c)(1)(i) and (ii). Temp. Regs. Sec. 1.461-2T(c)(1)(iii)(D) and (E) exclude as a "transfer to provide for the satisfaction of an asserted liability" a transfer of a taxpayer's debt or promise to provide services or property in the future and a transfer (other than to the person asserting the liability) of a taxpayer's stock, or a related-party's debt or stock (as defined in Sec. 267(b)).

Conclusion

The IRS's and Treasury's actions clearly show their intent to focus on transactions they deem abusive. Tax advisers can undoubtedly anticipate additional transactions attaining listed stares in the near future.

FROM KIMBERLY GILL gill, in weights and measures
gill, in weights and measures: see English units of measurement.
, VICE PRESIDENT, WASHINGTON MUTUAL “WaMu” redirects here. For the Washington, DC radio station, see WAMU.

Washington Mutual (or WaMu; NYSE: WM) is the United States' largest savings and loan association.
 BANK, SEATTLE, WA
COPYRIGHT 2004 American Institute of CPA's
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2004, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:Gill, Kimberly
Publication:The Tax Adviser
Date:Apr 1, 2004
Words:646
Previous Article:Procedures for obtaining return copies and information.(tax procedures)
Next Article:Structuring corporate payments to shareholder-employees to avoid a second class of stock.
Topics:



Related Articles
Irrevocable grantor trust can provide estate tax planning opportunity for S shareholders. (Brief Article)
Contested liabilities - when is a deduction allowed?
Deductibility of contested liabilities.
Small business tax solutions. (constructive receipt of rental income)
Individuals may not deduct fees for credit cards used to pay personal income tax.
Deducting third party investment mgnt. fees under Sec. 67(e).
The new "offshore" accounts. (Vested Interests).(self-settle trusts)(Brief Article)
New regs. on contested liability trusts.
Trusty trustees: what every trustee should know about California law.(ESTATE PLANNING)
Reportable transactions - what tax advisers need to know.

Terms of use | Copyright © 2009 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles