Printer Friendly
The Free Library
14,557,847 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Smooth celling.


I have always admired the linguistic standards maintained by NR. I wish therefore to raise a question about your usage of the construction "cellphone (CELLular telePHONE) The first ubiquitous wireless telephone. Originally analog, all new cellular systems are digital, which has enabled the cellphone to turn into a smartphone that has access to the Internet. " versus the original two-word "cell phone." While the "cellular telephone" root clearly needs abbreviation abbreviation, in writing, arbitrary shortening of a word, usually by cutting off letters from the end, as in U.S. and Gen. (General). Contraction serves the same purpose but is understood strictly to be the shortening of a word by cutting out letters in the middle, , it seems rather drastic to compress the two words into one. Doing so would suggest that other phone types should also be compacted to single-word status: "cordedphone," "wirelessphone," or perhaps "cordlessphone." These wouldn't work. So why does "cellphone"?

Jeremy Weidenhof

Houston, Tex.

THE EDITORS REPLY: Cellmate cell·mate  
n.
A person with whom one shares a cell, especially in a prison.
, cellblock cell·block  
n.
A group of cells that make up a section or unit of a prison.

Noun 1. cellblock - a division of a prison (usually consisting of several cells)
ward
, cellphone. Sold?

NATIONAL REVIEW encourages letters to the editor. Letters should be submitted by e-mail to letters@nationalreview.com or by fax to (212) 849-2835 or by mail to: Letters Editor, NATIONAL REVIEW, 215 Lexington Avenue, New York New York, state, United States
New York, Middle Atlantic state of the United States. It is bordered by Vermont, Massachusetts, Connecticut, and the Atlantic Ocean (E), New Jersey and Pennsylvania (S), Lakes Erie and Ontario and the Canadian province of
, N.Y. 10016.

Please include your full name, address, and daytime phone number. Letters will be edited for space and clarity.
COPYRIGHT 2006 National Review, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2006, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:letters to the editor
Publication:National Review
Article Type:Letter to the editor
Date:Sep 25, 2006
Words:144
Previous Article:Air power.(letters to the editor)(Letter to the editor)
Next Article:The week.(Survivor reality show, Mitt Romney confirmed monogamist, George W. Bush's new rhetoric on Iraq war)



Related Articles
Trust your staff to solve workflow problems.
Rudolph Agricola. Letters (MR 216).(Book Review)
Head of U.S. homebuilders backs stand on agreement.(Letter to the Editor)
Fish freedom act.(lifelines)
Smith v. Muccino.(CONDITIONS OF CONFINEMENT)(violation of constitutional rights)(Brief Article)
Smith v. Muccino.(CRUEL AND UNUSUAL PUNISHMENT)(Brief Article)
Baker v. Haun.(Brief Article)
Baker v. Haun.(LIABILITY)(Brief Article)
Warts and all.(LETTERS)(Letter to the Editor)

Terms of use | Copyright © 2009 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles