Printer Friendly
The Free Library
4,637,909 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Smith v. Carrasco.


U.S. District Court

CONFISCATION confiscation

In law, the act of seizing property without compensation and submitting it to the public treasury. Illegal items such as narcotics or firearms, or profits from the sale of illegal items, may be confiscated by the police. Additionally, government action (e.g.
 

Smith v. Carrasco, 334 F.Supp.2d 1094 (N.D.Ind. 2004). A state prison inmate brought a [section] 1983 action alleging that corrections officials violated his constitutional rights by confiscating his anarchist an·ar·chist  
n.
An advocate of or a participant in anarchism.


anarchist
Noun

1. a person who advocates anarchism

2.
 pamphlets. The district court held that the allegation that officers confiscated con·fis·cate  
tr.v. con·fis·cat·ed, con·fis·cat·ing, con·fis·cates
1. To seize (private property) for the public treasury.

2. To seize by or as if by authority. See Synonyms at appropriate.

adj.
 his pamphlets was sufficient to state First Amendment and equal protection claims, but the allegations failed to state a claim of cruel and unusual punishment Such punishment as would amount to torture or barbarity, any cruel and degrading punishment not known to the Common Law, or any fine, penalty, confinement, or treatment that is so disproportionate to the offense as to shock the moral sense of the community. . According to according to
prep.
1. As stated or indicated by; on the authority of: according to historians.

2. In keeping with: according to instructions.

3.
 the court, even if the confiscation meant that the inmate was unable to finish writing his book, any injury was not sufficiently serious to constitute a too-rigorous condition of confinement. The court noted that the inmate could not seek damages for mental or emotional injury because he did not suffer any actual physical injury. The court held that there were adequate remedies under state law for the alleged illegal deprivation of property. (Maximum Control Facility, Indiana)
COPYRIGHT 2005 CRS, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2005, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:PROPERTY-PRISONER PERSONAL
Publication:Corrections Caselaw Quarterly
Article Type:Brief Article
Geographic Code:1U3IN
Date:Feb 1, 2005
Words:152
Previous Article:Jacklovich v. Simmons.(PROPERTY-PRISONER PERSONAL)
Next Article:Barham v. Ramsey.(RELEASE)(Brief Article)
Topics:



Related Articles
Smith v. Muccino.(prisoner on prisoner assault)(Brief Article)
Koger v. Snyder.(ACCESS TO COURTS)(Brief Article)
Koger v. Snyder.(searches and seizures lawsuit)(Brief Article)
Koger v. Snyder.(searches and seizures)(Brief Article)
Koger v. Snyder.(TRANSFERS)(Brief Article)
Singleton v. Norris.(MENTAL PROBLEMS (PRISONER))(Brief Article)
Jacklovich v. Simmons.(PROPERTY-PRISONER PERSONAL)
Shakur v. Selsky.(RELIGION)(Brief Article)
Sutton v. Rasheed.(Brief Article)
Habeas corpus.(Brief Article)

Terms of use | Copyright © 2008 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles