Printer Friendly
The Free Library
14,635,666 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Skin Show: Indecency in Utah. (Citings).


UTAH'S PORN CZARINA CZARINA. The title of the empress of Russia. , Paula Houston Paula Houston was Utah's Obscenity and Pornography Complaints Ombudsman or "porn czar." She was the czar from 2001-2003. Before rising to her post, she was a prosecutor.

Houston grew up in Columbia Falls, Montana, and graduated from Brigham Young University.
, says her most important job is to educate. This legislative session she's teaching the legislature that its 12-year-old indecent public display law is unconstitutionally strict.

"I realized that you could not prohibit all nudity for anyone under says Houston, who became the country's first porn czar, officially the "obscenity obscenity, in law, anything that tends to corrupt public morals by its indecency. The moral concepts that the term connotes vary from time to time and from place to place. In the United States, the word obscenity is a technical legal term. In the 1950s the U.S.  and pornography complaints ombudsman," last July. "Constitutionally, you had to have an exception if it has any value in it for the child." Houston is working to amend the law to exempt nude material that "when taken as a whole, has serious value for persons younger than 18 years of age."

The reaction has been mixed. "Some citizens would like to prohibit all nudity for children," says Houston, who reports getting far more complaints about Cosmopolitan and In Style magazines than Playboy, Penthouse, or Hustler hustler Sexology A ♂ paid to service–nudge, nudge, wink, wink–♀ or other ♂ , since the fashion mags line supermarket checkout aisles. "Others realize that this provision makes sense. A postcard of the statue of David for sale in a store violates the current law."

Houston adds, "Simple nudity is not, according to according to
prep.
1. As stated or indicated by; on the authority of: according to historians.

2. In keeping with: according to instructions.

3.
 the U.S. Supreme Court, harmful to children, You can't protect children from everything."
COPYRIGHT 2002 Reason Foundation
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2002, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:Lynch, Michael W.
Publication:Reason
Article Type:Brief Article
Geographic Code:1USA
Date:Apr 1, 2002
Words:192
Previous Article:Big talkers. (Data).(Dept. of Justice hypes terrorism to justify budget)(Brief Article)
Next Article:Stale Granola: Laissez-forget it. (Citings).(Brief Article)(Company Profile)
Topics:



Related Articles
Pervasive problem: the 1978 Supreme Court decision allowing censorship of dirty words on radio threatens free speech in cyberspace.
Incontinence Products.(from Tranquility)(Brief Article)(Product Announcement)
Fathers Glendinning and Russell.(Catholic priests sued for indecent acts committed against teenagers)(Brief Article)
VICTORIAN ERA'S TRIAL OF THE CENTURY.(L.A. LIFE)
Exhibitionist gets 10-year term.(Crime)(The defendant had eight earlier convictions and never attended the treatment that was ordered by judges)
Your records, please: the war on "indecency".(Citings)(broadcasters to retain airchecks)(Brief Article)
Common sense returns.(Editorials)(The FCC restores context to indecency rules)(Editorial)
FCC hires Religious Right activist to serve as 'decency advisor'.(PEOPLE & EVENTS)
Supreme Court Labaye ruling: the other side to Group Sex at L'Orage.
The search for decency.(Federal Communications Commission)

Terms of use | Copyright © 2009 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles