Printer Friendly
The Free Library
14,799,441 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Should Humans Be Cloned?


New methods can create a baby who is your genetic twin

YES

The cloning of human beings is now possible. Scientists can take an egg cell, remove its DNA DNA: see nucleic acid.
DNA
 or deoxyribonucleic acid

One of two types of nucleic acid (the other is RNA); a complex organic compound found in all living cells and many viruses. It is the chemical substance of genes.
, insert DNA from a cell of any person, and create an embryo who is that person's younger but identical twin. This technology offers a miracle option for families who cannot have children of their own by any other method. After 25 years as a fertility specialist, trying to help couples have babies, I have joined with scientists in Europe and elsewhere to develop that option. By doing so, I believe, we will be helping humanity.

It is true that the cloning of animals--such as Dolly the sheep, created in Scotland in 1997--has so far had a high failure rate and is fraught with risks. But those risks have been exaggerated, and many of them have resulted from improper cloning. Meanwhile, I can show you e-mails from thousands of families eager to accept those risks. They say in their messages that if they are able to have a child through cloning, they will love that son or daughter just as much as they would any other.

Believe it or not, the genie genie: see jinni.


An online information and bulletin board service that closed its doors at the end of 1999, much to the dismay of its many users, some of whom were still chatting when the plug was pulled.
 is out of the bottle. Human cloning Although genes are recognized as influencing behavior and cognition, "genetically identical" does not mean altogether identical; identical twins, despite being natural human clones with near identical DNA, are separate people, with separate experiences and not altogether  will be done whether we like it or not. I think we should accept it, make it legal, regulate it, and make sure it is done in a responsible, scientifically correct way --not left to unscrupulous black-market exploiters.

--PANOS ZAVOS, PH.D. Director, Andrology Institute of America Lexington, Ky.

NO

Don't think about human cloning from the point of view of the person being cloned. Think about it as if you were the younger, duplicated copy. If you do, you'll see at once why cloning a human being is deeply unethical.

First, the known grave risks of abnormality and deformity Deformity
See also Lameness.

Calmady, Sir Richard

born without lower legs. [Br. Lit.: Sir Richard Calmady, Walsh Modern, 84]

Carey, Philip

embittered young man with club foot seeks fulfillment. [Br. Lit.
 seen in animal cloning make attempts at human cloning an immoral experiment on the resulting child-to-be. Second, even if you were a healthy clone, would you want to be constantly compared with the adult original in whose image you have been made? Wouldn't you want to have your own unique identity and an open-ended future, fully a surprise to yourself and the world?

If you were the clone of your "mother," would it help your adolescence to turn into the spitting image spitting image
n.
A perfect likeness or counterpart.



[Alteration of spit and image, from spit, an exact likeness, as in the very spit of; see spit1.
 of the woman Daddy fell in love with? If you were the clone of your "father" but your parents later divorced, would you like to look just like the man your mother now detests?

Third, don't you think it is a form of child abuse for parents to try to determine in advance just exactly what kind of a child you are supposed to be? Do you want to live under the tyranny of their biologically determined expectations?

Finally, would you like to turn human procreation PROCREATION. The generation of children; it is an act authorized by the law of nature: one of the principal ends of marriage is the procreation of children. Inst. tit. 2, in pr.  into manufacture, producing children as artifacts artifacts

see specimen artifacts.
? Cloning is tyrannical and dehumanizing. We should have none of it.

--LEON R. KASS KASS Kansas Agricultural Statistics Service , M.D. Professor, Committee on Social Thought University of Chicago
COPYRIGHT 2001 Scholastic, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2001, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:KASS, LEON R.
Publication:New York Times Upfront
Article Type:Brief Article
Date:Apr 30, 2001
Words:505
Previous Article:Those Crazy Rockin' Teenagers.
Next Article:Drawing on the News.(Humor)(Brief Article)
Topics:



Related Articles
A fantastical experiment: the science behind the controversial cloning of Dolly. (first cloning of mammal from adult nucleus)(Cover Story)
Cloning: good science or baaaad idea: (includes a comparison of reproduction of sheep by fertilization and by cloning)(Cover Story)
Cloning isn't sexy.(Editorial)
The mystery remains: what cloning can't reproduce.(Column)
Me and my shadow: the prospect of human cloning raises environmental and ethical issues.
UNNATURAL SELECTION.(ethics of reproductive biotechnology)
Double Trouble.(proposal to ban human cloning)(Brief Article)
Cloning hearing creates media frenzy.(protests, and possible legislation, against human cloning)(Brief Article)
First human clone? (Life News).
The science and politics of genetically modified humans: will new genetic technologies be carefully controlled for their benefits--or will they...

Terms of use | Copyright © 2010 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles