Shoshone Indians ask for UN intervention.In an appeal to the UN Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination, the Western Shoshone Western Shoshone n. See Shoshone. tribe has asked the world body to intervene in a land ownership dispute with the federal government. The Shoshone petition "challenges the U.S. government's assertion of federal ownership of nearly 90 percent of Western Shoshone lands," reported Indian Country Today Indian Country Today is a weekly U.S. newspaper which describes itself as "The Nations' Leading American Indian News Source." Focusing on news of interest to the Native American community, the newspaper was founded in 1981. on August 19. The dispute involves roughly 60 million acres stretching across Nevada, Idaho, Utah, and California. "The lands include the proposed Yucca Mountain Yucca Mountain, mountain in the SW Nevada desert about 100 mi (161 km) northwest of Las Vegas. It is the proposed site of a Dept. of Energy (DOE) repository for up to 77,000 metric tons of nuclear waste (including commercial and defense spent fuel and high-level high-level nuclear waste facility and lands targeted for expanded gold extraction Gold extraction or recovery from its ores may require a combination of comminution, mineral processing, hydrometallurgical, and pyrometallurgical processes to be performed on the ore. ," notes the report. "Our traditional laws tell us we were placed here as caretakers of the land," stated Western Shoshone spokesman Joe Kennedy Joe Kennedy might refer to:
Also among the grievances listed by the tribe was the fact that "domestic law allowed the U.S. government to unilaterally abrogate abrogate v. to annul or repeal a law or pass legislation that contradicts the prior law. Abrogate also applies to revoking or withdrawing conditions of a contract. (See: repeal) Indian treaties, [a question] to which the United States never provided an answer." Some--not all--of the Western Shoshones' grievances have merit. Unconstitutional federal control over lands in the western U.S. vexes Americans of all backgrounds, as does Washington's habit of redefining the law and constitutional provisions to suit its whims. If genuine federal accountability and reform are the desired outcome of the petition--as opposed to building precedents for global governance--turning the matter over to the UN is exactly the worst way to proceed. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||

Printer friendly
Cite/link
Email
Feedback
Reader Opinion