Printer Friendly
The Free Library
14,680,804 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

She said, he says. (Editing).


Last fall Copy Editor newsletter polled its readers: "Which verb tense do you prefer when attributing quotations?"

The answers available were "Present tense. For example, John Doe John Doe

formerly, any plaintiff; now just anybody. [Am. Pop. Usage: Brewer Dictionary, 329]

See : Everyman
 says"; "Past tense. For example, John Doe said"; "I don't follow any particular rule"; and "I follow a rule that depends on context."

Frankly, it's a question we here at NL/NL have never quite come to grips with. We have no iron-clad rule-sometimes it's "John Doe told us," other times it's, "John Doe says."

We consulted a number of style and usage manuals--including The Associated Press Stylebook style·book  
n.
A book giving rules and examples of usage, punctuation, and typography, used in preparation of copy for publication.
 and Libel Manual, The New York Public Library New York Public Library, free library supported by private endowments and gifts and by the city and state of New York. It is the one of largest libraries in the world.  Writers Guide to Style and Usage, Webster's Dictionary of English Usage, and the Harper Dictionary of Contemporary Usage-and came up empty.

Except, that is, for a brief notation in Webster's Dictionary of English Usage:

"The use of the present tense where the past might be expected appears to add a certain immediacy to the narration. Such usage is fine in a chatty chat·ty  
adj. chat·ti·er, chat·ti·est
1. Inclined to chat; friendly and talkative.

2. Full of or in the style of light informal talk: a chatty letter.
, colloquial col·lo·qui·al  
adj.
1. Characteristic of or appropriate to the spoken language or to writing that seeks the effect of speech; informal.

2. Relating to conversation; conversational.
 style, even though a bit iffy if·fy  
adj. if·fi·er, if·fi·est Informal
Doubtful; uncertain: an iffy proposition.



[From if.
 by modern grammatical standards."

Similarly, Copy Editor reports in its December 2001--January 2002 issue:

"Few stylebooks offer guidance on this point, a fact that might help explain the lack of consensus in the responses to this question: 24 percent of respondents voted for the present tense, 34 percent voted for the past tense, and 3 percent apparently come to work every day with no rule whatsoever in mind. The remaining 40 percent of respondents voted for 'depends on context."'

Many Copy Editor subscribers among this last group who sent comments along with their responses "felt that spot news articles demand the use of the past tense whereas the present is more appropriate in features, columns, and the like."

One copy editor wrote that the present tense is simply "more personal."

While one respondent wrote that "she uses the present tense tense whenever quoting literature" [We call that "the Bible says" rule], another wrote that she doesn't use the present tense for "deceased speakers." Oddly, both seem to make sense.

Copy Editor, "looking for Looking for

In the context of general equities, this describing a buy interest in which a dealer is asked to offer stock, often involving a capital commitment. Antithesis of in touch with.
 someone to lead the way out of the thicket," polled a few authorities by e-mail. "They all, it turned out, belong to the 'depends on context' school....

"Patricia T. O'Conner, the author of Woe Is I and Words Fail Me, cautioned that the present tense 'often seems mannered when used for writerly writ·er·ly  
adj.
Of, relating to, characteristic of, or befitting a writer: "set a standard of writerly craft for that...well-wrought magazine" Newsweek. 
 effect.' She added, 'Whichever tense you choose, be consistent, and don't mix your seds with your sezes."'

Copy Editor, Barbara Wallraff editor, 1010 E. Missouri Ave., Phoenix, AZ 85014, 888-626-8779, www.copyeditor.com.
COPYRIGHT 2002 The Newsletter on Newsletters LLC
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2002, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Publication:The Newsletter on Newsletters
Date:Jan 31, 2002
Words:430
Previous Article:NEPF sets deadline for newsletter journalism competition. (Editing).
Next Article:NEPA marks 25th anniversary, founding member questions its future.



Related Articles
Onstage: who censored Anne Frank? (theory that Frank rewrote her diary in preparation for publication)(Brief Article)
She makes the cut(s).(Nika Hunter, video editor, profile)(Brief Article)
Bridging Two Eras: The Autobiography of Emily Newell Blair 1877-1951.
EDITING AWARDS GO TO 'ROUGE,' 'HAWK'.(U)
DID THE GOP DOCTOR TAPES? HUBBELL'S LAWYER SAYS EDITS TARGET CLINTON.(News)
ART OF GOOD BUSINESS : WRITERS NETWORK OFFERS TIPS TO SUCCESS.(NEWS)
How to get your literary freak on. (Erotic fiction).(Bibliography)
Film views Cambodia 25 years after terror.(Arts & Literature)(A movie maker will screen her documentary about survivors of the killing fields)
Passages.(Obituary)
Harder than Hardscrabble: Oral Recollections of the Farming Life from the Edge of the Texas Hill Country.(Country Women Cope with Hard Times: A...

Terms of use | Copyright © 2009 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles