Printer Friendly

Sexual harassment settlement not deductible.

The girlfriend of a professional football llayer filed a criminal complaint player filed a criminal complaint charging the athlete with sexual offense. At the time, the player was negotiating a contract with his team management, who indicated his employment would be terminated if the incident was made public.

The player arranged a $25,000 payment to the woman in exchange for her dropping the charges and keeping the matter private. On his tax return for the year of payment he deducted the $25,000 as a "professional development expense," claiming that, in light of the threat by the football team, the payment was made to keep his job.

The Tax Court, in Michael Harden v. Commissioner (TC Memo 1991-454) denied deductibility. It cited the U.S. Supreme Court test basing deductibility on the origin and character of the claim to which the payment relates. To be deductible, the expense must have a business origin.

The Tax Court held the reason for the player's payment and the origin of the criminal complaint were two separate items. Since the criminal complaint and charge arose from a personal relationship, and the condition for continued employment was only consequence, no business expense deduction was allowed.

Observation: Tax return preparers must be mindful of the disclosures that might be required for claimed deductions. What might appear at first to be a deductible item may not properly qualify as such when more closely examined.
COPYRIGHT 1992 American Institute of CPA's
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 1992, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:Michael Harden v. Commissioner
Author:Paul, Herbert
Publication:Journal of Accountancy
Date:Jan 1, 1992
Words:238
Previous Article:IRS deficiency thrown out due to "gross ineptitude."
Next Article:Unpaid business payroll taxes.
Topics:


Related Articles
Beyond horseplay: students sue schools over sexual harassment.
No recourse for same-sex harassment, Fourth Circuit rules.
Same-sex harassment: gay men and lesbians being harassed in the workplace are about to have their day in court.
Sexual orientation irrelevant in man-to-man harassment.
Burden of proof shifted in sex harassment cases.
Defining sexual harassment.
But is it harassment?
Iowa justices allow Title VII claim for fatal punch.
Challenging masculinity: a rise in male-on-male sexual harassment in the workplace is more about homophobia than sexual favors.

Terms of use | Copyright © 2016 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters