Printer Friendly
The Free Library
5,669,545 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Seventh Circuit Dismisses Appeal by Leo Stoller.


Pure Fishing's Assertions of Invalid Trademarks Upheld

WASHINGTON -- Last week the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals dismissed the appeal of Leo Stoller Leo D. Stoller (born June 5, 1946) is an American self-styled "intellectual property entrepreneur" based in suburban Chicago, Illinois. Stoller controversially claimed rights to a large inventory of "famous" trademarks and engaged in the assertive enforcement of those alleged  against the outcomes of the trademark infringement Trademark infringement is a violation of the exclusive rights attaching to a trademark without the authorization of the trademark owner or any licensees (provided that such authorization was within the scope of the license).  case Central Mfg. Co. vs. Pure Fishing, Inc. The dismissal of Mr. Stoller's appeal ends decades of trademark infringement lawsuits and oppositions of questionable factual foundation. By upholding the original conviction, the court validates Pure Fishing's assertion that Mr. Stoller's trademarks were invalid and that the injunction levied against him was just and fair.

On October 4, 2006, the federal district court in Illinois entered final judgment on all counts in favor of Pure Fishing, et al. Further, the district court declared the case to be "exceptional" under 15 U.S.C. u 1117(a) and ordered Mr. Stoller, Central Mfg. Co. and several other of Mr. Stoller's wholly owned companies to pay Pure Fishing's costs, charges and disbursements incurred in the action.

In addition, the district court:

(1) Ordered that US Trademark Registration No. 1,766,806 and the STEALTH mark for fishing bobbers was "lapsed LEGACY, LAPSED. A legacy is said to be lapsed or extinguished, when the legatee dies before the testator, or before the condition upon which the legacy is given has been performed, or before the time at which it is directed to vest in interest has arrived. Bac. Ab. Legacy, E; Com. Dig. , invalid, abandoned, unenforceable Adj. 1. unenforceable - not enforceable; not capable of being brought about by compulsion; "an unenforceable law"; "unenforceable reforms"
enforceable - capable of being enforced
, and forfeit under federal and common laws;"

(2) Canceled each of the 33 STEALTH trademark registrations listed in the complaint;

(3) Held that there was no reasonable likelihood of confusion with respect to the mark used by Pure Fishing;

(4) Held that Mr. Stoller and his companies were liable for a prior sanction judgment in S Industries, Inc. v. Centra 2000, Inc., 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10649, 1998 WL 395161 (N.D. Ill. 1998) so as to allow execution against that judgment; and

(5) Enjoined Mr. Stoller and his companies from, inter alia [Latin, Among other things.] A phrase used in Pleading to designate that a particular statute set out therein is only a part of the statute that is relevant to the facts of the lawsuit and not the entire statute. , "dissipating, transferring, assigning, liquidating, or otherwise removing the trademark assets."

In a rare decision, the Court further ordered that Mr. Stoller and his companies were "vexatious litigants" and barred them "from instituting any lawsuit or trademark opposition without prior leave of this Court pursuant to this Court's authority under the All Writs Act 28 U.S.C. u 1651(a)." This injunction follows a sanction entered by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office in July 2006 that prohibits Mr. Stoller from filing certain types of documents against trademark applicants for two years and requires that he use a lawyer for such documents thereafter.

In response to this district court judgment, Mr. Stoller filed an appeal to challenge the fairness of the sanctions and the cancellation of his STEALTH trademarks.

Over the course of these legal proceedings All actions that are authorized or sanctioned by law and instituted in a court or a tribunal for the acquisition of rights or the enforcement of remedies. , documents and testimony revealed that Mr. Stoller was engaged in an average of 30-40 oppositions or trademark lawsuits each year since 1996. Conservative estimates place Mr. Stoller's impact on the US economy for the last 11 years between $60-100 million in unnecessary legal costs to trademark applicants. Mr. Stoller's personal bankruptcy Personal bankruptcy is a procedure which, in certain jurisdictions, allows an individual to declare bankruptcy. In other jurisdictions, bankruptcies are reserved for corporations.  case remains pending in Illinois (05 B 64075), and he continues to assert his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination against efforts by the court-appointed trustee to determine the scope and extent of his financial estate.

Roylance, Abrams, Berdo & Goodman, L.L.P. (www.roylance.com) based in Washington, DC, served as lead counsel; Banner & Witcoff (www.bannerwitcoff.com) of Chicago was the local firm.

Roylance, Abrams, Berdo & Goodman, L.L.P. specializes in protecting and defending the intellectual property assets, copyrights and trademarks for their clients. Known for innovative solutions, we use groundbreaking and traditional legal strategies to provide a full range of services including litigation An action brought in court to enforce a particular right. The act or process of bringing a lawsuit in and of itself; a judicial contest; any dispute.

When a person begins a civil lawsuit, the person enters into a process called litigation.
, licensing, trade secret matters and unfair competition to companies worldwide. We have extensive experience in proceedings before the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office and prevailed in the first-filed inter partes INTER PARTES. This, in a technical sense, signifies an agreement professing in the outset, and before any stipulations are introduced, to be made between such and such persons as, for example, " This Indenture, made the _____ day of _____ 1848, between A B of the one part, and C D of the  patent reexamination re·ex·am·ine also re-ex·am·ine  
tr.v. re·ex·am·ined, re·ex·am·in·ing, re·ex·am·ines
1. To examine again or anew; review.

2. Law To question (a witness) again after cross-examination.
. Clients include Hubble Incorporated, Pure Fishing, Samsung Electronics Samsung Electronics (SEC, Hangul:삼성전자; KSE: 005930, KSE: 005935, LSE: SMSN, LSE: SMSD) is a South Korean multinational corporation and the world's largest and leading electronics and information technology company. , The American Farm Bureau, and XM Satellite Radio. Roylance, Abrams is headquartered in Washington, DC. For more information, visit www.roylance.com.
COPYRIGHT 2007 Business Wire
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2007, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Publication:Business Wire
Date:Feb 23, 2007
Words:630
Previous Article:ECFL Catapults Forward Opening Negotiations with an Alternative Fuels Company.
Next Article:Landmark Communications, Inc. Acquires Franchise.com.



Related Articles
Individual taxpayers disallowed deficiency interest deduction.
Take it from the top.
Federal courts have no autherity to expunge records, Third Circuit rules.
Court rules that banks can charge discretionary settlement service fees.(Brief Article)
ILLINOIS VILLAGE GETS A SPANKING OVER QUALIFIED IMMUNITY.
ILLINOIS: NO ATTORNEY FEES FOR RICO DEFENDANTS.
SUIT OF THE WEEK: GAMBLER LOSES THE BIG ONE-A RICO LAWSUIT.
CITIZENSHIP OF LLOYD'S 'NAME' ALLOWS JURISDICTION, U.S. COURT SAYS.
Plaintiffs may not file for nationwide class certification in state courts, Seventh Circuit says.
They wrote that, too? Celebrating a song-writing powerhouse.(Entertainment)

Terms of use | Copyright © 2009 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles