Printer Friendly

Serbia's leap year: the path to EU candidate status--to say nothing of actual membership--is never without its complications.

The term "red lines" is much-used in the Balkans; frequently spoken in Athens and Skopje amid the Macedonia name dispute, for years it has been heard in Belgrade too, in reference to Kosovo.

But just as those in favour of Serbia being granted European Union candidate country status were making what they hoped would be the final encouraging noises needed to achieve this milestone, Serbia's president Boris Tadicfound himself again speaking of "red lines"--but for once, not about Kosovo, but about Romanian demands.


By February 28, there was confirmation that EU ministers meeting in Brussels had agreed to recommend Serbia for candidate country status. But Nicolai Wammen, European affairs minister for Denmark, current holder of the EU rotating presidency, conceded publicly that the talks among the foreign ministers had been "difficult and tough".

In sum, while most of the 27 ministers were in favour of the go-ahead for Serbia, Romania has underlined demands about the estimated 30 000-strong Vlach minority. Bucharest set as a trade-off for its consent that Vlachs in Serbia would declare themselves to be members of the Romanian minority. A complex issue, it is one on which Vlachs themselves are divided.

Hopes were, ahead of the March 1 and 2 meeting of the European Council, that in the same way agreement had been achieved among the EU ministers, the same could be done at the level of heads of government and state.

But Serbia has experienced disappointment at the European Council before, most recently in December when a decision on its candidate status was postponed because of conflict in northern Kosovo.

Serbian president Boris Tadic, speaking on February 28 to Radio Television Serbia, made it clear that he would not give in to what he called "blackmails".

"If we do not define red lines, no one will take us seriously," Tadic said, as quoted by Serbian news website B92. "If Serbia showed weakness and agreed to black-mails, there would be no end to them. It is important that we stick firmly to our principles."

European path

Among the EU's top office-bearers and those EU countries that have been very public about their backing for Serbia (not without tandem support for Kosovo), the messages were generally upbeat.

Stefan Fule, European Com-missioner for Enlargement and Neighbourhood Policy, said after the EU ministers meeting: "Today is a good day, not only for Serbia and Kosovo but for the enlargement process of the EU in general".

Fule hastened to express confidence that the European Council would endorse the agreement of the EU foreign ministers.

Also not missing a message that several at EU level and regional leaders such as Bulgaria want to underline, Fule said that candidate status would open a new era in EU-Serbia relations "and I expect that Serbia, as a candidate country, will be able to further progress on its reform agenda so as to prepare for the future opening of accession negotiations".

Bulgarian Foreign Minister Nikolai Mladenov, in a statement on February 27, said that agreement by EU foreign ministers to grant candidate country status Serbia would be good for the entire region. He reaffirmed Bulgaria's support for all its neighbours progressing towards the EU on the basis of all commitments in the political and legal criteria for membership, which included how the rights of citizens in the state were respected.

He said that Bulgaria would monitor the situation in Serbia closely, with an emphasis on minority issues and human rights.

European Commission President Jose Barroso, speaking on February 28 after talks with Tadic, said that it was "important that Serbia remains committed to an ambitious reform agenda and to its dialogue with Pristina".

It was key breakthroughs in that dialogue between Belgrade and Pristina, just a few days previously, that helped achieve the agreement among the EU foreign ministers.

"Only concrete steps and results will allow our relationship to develop further," Barroso said. "Serbia holds the key to deepen our ties and to its own progress".


Tadicemphasised that Serbia deserved to be given a date for the start of accession talks as soon as possible.

Meanwhile, Kosovo was not without its benefits from the meeting. Ministers agreed to the starting of a feasibility study into a stabilisation and association agreement with Kosovo. The EU has a track record of such agreements with countries seen as possibly, ultimately, headed for membership of the bloc.

In the case of Kosovo, where five out of 27 EU states decline to recognise Kosovo's independence and the official EU position is "status neutral", even the beginning of such a process is sure to generate further complications, and no doubt, some red lines too.

'If Serbia showed weakness and agreed to blackmails, there would be no end to them,' Tadicsaid.
COPYRIGHT 2012 The Sofia Echo
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2012 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.
milanovicb (Member): Double arshines 3/27/2012 10:03 AM
Me, as an citizen of Serbia, living in A.P "Vojvodina" (North Serbia), can say one thing "everything for Kosovo, Kosovo for nothing " . Nearly 7M people is on edge of real life-existance. As an candidate, now, for EU - Serbia has an average wage of 250euros PER MONTH, with gasoline/gas price of 1.6 euros per liter ?! With 50 euro cents for 700grams of bread? For health-care status in country, that can be compared with those in Azerbejan, with no disrespect. I don't know, but I don't recall that any country has been required to "give" part of land for so called "better life" in EU. Don't get me wrong, as an Sistem Administrator (CERTIFICATED) with English for Business : Upper Intermediate certificate - I AM WITHOUT A JOB! Yes, I am on MMT, but that wasn't an issues when I was working for NCR, the American company that recently opened it's European Center for Customer Care Support. I was hiried in "TESCO UK" team. I had decent sailary, but, after little bit more than a month I've got an "both-agreed" contract closure - without written reason, why ?! I don't think that in EU worker can be fired whitout a reason. I was the best in my team. Their representative, who gave me that paper just said:"You didn't have the right people skills with that woman from Bosnia...You should had be there for here, whenever she needs You.". What am I, a trainee ?
Fast rewind... We had a month of training before hiring...

 Reader Opinion




Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:Leviev-Sawyer, Clive
Publication:The Sofia Echo (Sofia, Bulgaria)
Date:Mar 2, 2012
Previous Article:Western union.
Next Article:Btc offers.

Terms of use | Copyright © 2016 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters