Printer Friendly
The Free Library
14,558,467 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Seeds of doubt: Monsanto in court.


Did Canadian canola farmer Percy Schmeiser intentionally plant patented, genetically engineered genetically engineered adjective Recombinant, see there  (GE) seed on his Saskatchewan farm in 1997 and 19987 Chemical giant Monsanto says he did; he says he didn't. The question is important, because Schmeiser has become a major figure in the anti-GE movement, lecturing widely on the wrongs done him by Monsanto.

A Canadian federal court ruled in 2001 that Schmeiser violated Monsanto's patent--regardless of how the seed got there--and must pay the company nearly $100,000. Anti-genetic-engineering activists call him David fighting a corporate Goliath.

The case is now headed for Canada's Supreme Court, with Schmeiser's countersuit coun·ter·sue  
tr.v. coun·ter·sued, coun·ter·su·ing, coun·ter·sues Law
To bring proceedings against (a plaintiff) in direct opposition to a suit brought against onself.
 against Monsanto following close behind. The Saskatchewan farmer argues the chemical giant contaminated contaminated,
v 1. made radioactive by the addition of small quantities of radioactive material.
2. made contaminated by adding infective or radiographic materials.
3. an infective surface or object.
 the environment and his crops through inadequate safeguards to prevent the spread of pollen and seed for its herbicide-resistant canola.

In 1996, Monsanto began marketing seed for plants that withstand the company's ubiquitous herbicide herbicide (hr`bəsīd'), chemical compound that kills plants or inhibits their normal growth. A herbicide in a particular formulation and application can be described as selective or nonselective. , RoundUp (glyphosate glyphosate

herbicide and desiccant for grains. Heavy doses to birds cause soft shells on their eggs.
). Farmers who want the seed must buy it new from the company each year, sign special agreements to spray only Monsanto herbicides and allow company officials unfettered access to their fields. Anyone else caught growing the "RoundUp Ready" canola violates the patent and risks legal action from Monsanto.

Is it plausible that RoundUp Ready seed got on Schmeiser's field by mistake? Published studies have found that pollen from genetically engineered canola can contaminate fields more than 1.5 miles away. The lightweight seed also bounces off passing trucks, contaminating non-engineered fields across a wider range.

Researchers at the University of Manitoba Location
The main Fort Garry campus is a complex on the Red River in south Winnipeg. It has an area of 2.74 square kilometres. More than 60 major buildings support the teaching and research programs of the university.
 are shortly to publish findings that 32 of 33 supposedly GE-free seed lots in Canada were contaminated by as much as five percent genetically engineered seed.

Schmeiser's case is more complicated. Unlike most farmers who buy new seed each year, Schmeiser saved his own to replant re·plant
v.
To reattach an organ, limb, or other body part surgically to the original site.

n.
An organ, limb, or body part that has been replanted.
. He discovered the herbicide-resistant seed during the common practice of spraying RoundUp around roadside power poles edging his land.

Lyle Friesen--who led the University of Manitoba study and tested the seed from Schmeiser's field for the court case--doesn't doubt that the seed got there by blowing off a truck. But, he says, by the time Monsanto officials found it, there was enough of it growing that it must have been planted. Some fields had five percent GE crops, some up to 67 percent, Friesen says. Years of unwitting replanting of engineered seed could not account for the highest of those levels, he says.

Schmeiser acknowledges that he saved the Monsanto seed, but he claims that he planted it only by accident. Now the courts will once again have to rule on his veracity veracity (vras´itē),
n
. CONTACT: Percy Schmeiser, www.percyschmeiser.com; the 2001 court decision, www.decisions.fct-cf.gc.ca/fct/2001/2001fct256.html.
COPYRIGHT 2003 Earth Action Network, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2003, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:Izakson, Orna
Publication:E
Geographic Code:1USA
Date:May 1, 2003
Words:449
Previous Article:Throw it out at the old ballgame.
Next Article:Spilt ink.
Topics:



Related Articles
DuPont Co.(resolves lawsuits against Monsanto Co.)(Brief Article)
Seeds of discontent. (Interview).(canola farmer sued by Monsanto)(Interview)
Marketing campaign helps DEKALB take a bite out of Canadian competitors. (Canadian Update).(markeing strategies of Monsanto Co.'s DEKALB brand)
How big will it grow? The fortunes of Roundup Ready corn.(Monsanto Co. looks for greater hold in seed production)
Monsanto Co.(At Closing News)(Brief Article)
Farming's new feudalism: Percy Schmeiser and other casualties of industrial agriculture's drive to own it all.
A Federal District Court judge rules in favor of Syngenta Seeds, Inc., granting summary judgment with respect to the patents asserted by Monsanto...

Terms of use | Copyright © 2009 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles