Sec. 199 issues arising from contract manufacturing arrangements.
In the context of the domestic production activities deduction (DPAD DPAD Digital Pixel Array Detector ) provided by Sec. 199, Congress intended that only one taxpayer may claim the deduction for the same function performed regarding the same property. In order to determine whether the taxpayer or the contract manufacturer is entitled en·ti·tle
tr.v. en·ti·tled, en·ti·tling, en·ti·tles
1. To give a name or title to.
2. To furnish with a right or claim to something: to the Sec. 199 deduction for the same manufacturing activity, the Sec. 199 rules require an analysis of which party in a contract manufacturing relationship has the "benefits and burdens of ownership" under judicially developed federal income tax principles.
For tax years beginning after December 31, 2004, manufacturers and producers may be eligible for a deduction relating to relating to relate prep → concernant
relating to relate prep → bezüglich +gen, mit Bezug auf +acc income from certain qualifying domestic production activities under Sec. 199. The DPAD is equal to a percentage of the lesser of qualified production activities income or taxable income Under the federal tax law, gross income reduced by adjustments and allowable deductions. It is the income against which tax rates are applied to compute an individual or entity's tax liability. The essence of taxable income is the accrual of some gain, profit, or benefit to a taxpayer. (as determined without the Sec. 199 deduction). The percentage is phased in from 3% in tax years 2005 and 2006 to 6% in tax years 2007-2009, and 9% in tax years 2010 and beyond.
Under Sec. 199(c)(4), "domestic production gross receipts the total of the receipts, before they are diminished by any deduction, as for expenses; - distinguished from net profits.
See under Gross,
See also: Gross Receipt " refers to the gross receipts derived from, among other things, any lease, rental, license, sale, exchange, or other disposition of:
* Qualifying production property (QPP QPP Quebec Pension Plan
QPP Quebec Provincial Police
QPP Qualifying Production Property
QPP Qualified Project Practitioner
QPP Quality Program Plan
QPP Quality Pork Processors, Inc. ) that was manufactured, produced, grown, or extracted by the taxpayer in whole or in significant part within the United States United States, officially United States of America, republic (2005 est. pop. 295,734,000), 3,539,227 sq mi (9,166,598 sq km), North America. The United States is the world's third largest country in population and the fourth largest country in area. ;
* Any qualified film produced by the taxpayer; and
* Electricity, natural gas, or potable potable /pot·a·ble/ (po´tah-b'l) fit to drink.
Fit to drink; drinkable.
fit to drink. water (i.e., utilities) produced by the taxpayer in the United States.
The regulations under Sec. 199 clarify that the deduction is allowed only for manufacture or production by the taxpayer. Regs. Sec. 1.199-3(f) mandates, with certain exceptions, that only one taxpayer may claim the deduction for the qualifying activities discussed above that are performed in connection with the same QPP or the production of a qualified film or utilities. Further, the regulation provides that if one taxpayer performs a qualifying activity under a contract with another party, only the taxpayer that has the "benefit and burdens of ownership" of the property under federal income tax principles while the qualifying activity occurs is treated as engaging in the qualifying activity. The party without the benefits and burdens of ownership, by default, is treated as a mere service provider.
Benefits and Burdens of Ownership
The final Sec. 199 regulations retain the rules previously set out in Notice 2005-14 on how to determine which party has the benefits and burdens of ownership of the property. Notice 200514, which provided interim guidance until the final Sec. 199 regulations were issued in 2006, indicated that the benefits and burdens of ownership standard is based on the principles under Secs. 263A and 936. While those tests are not entirely directed toward qualification under Sec. 199, similar factors can be derived from these provisions to provide some direction on the application of the benefits and burdens of ownership test for purposes of Sec. 199.
Sec. 263A uses the benefits and burdens test to determine which taxpayer owns the produced property; the "producer" is the taxpayer to which the Sec. 263A capitalization capitalization n. 1) the act of counting anticipated earnings and expenses as capital assets (property, equipment, fixtures) for accounting purposes. 2) the amount of anticipated net earnings which hypothetically can be used for conversion into capital assets. requirements apply. Under Sec. 263A, the case most on point is Suzy's Zoo, 273 F.3d 875 (9th Cir. 2001). In that case, the taxpayer appealed a Tax Court decision in which the Tax Court found that the taxpayer exercised such a degree of control over the manufacturing of its products by third-party contractors that the taxpayer should be considered the owner and producer of the products for purposes of Sec. 263A.
The taxpayer created cartoon characters that were imprinted im·print
tr.v. im·print·ed, im·print·ing, im·prints
1. To produce (a mark or pattern) on a surface by pressure.
2. To produce a mark on (a surface) by pressure.
3. on its greeting cards See e-card. , stationery The term for boilerplate in the Eudora mail client, starting with Version 3.0. Stationery files are stored on disk and brought into new messages or added to replies. See boilerplate. , and various other products. Several independent contractors A person who contracts to do work for another person according to his or her own processes and methods; the contractor is not subject to another's control except for what is specified in a mutually binding agreement for a specific job. manufactured these products. Throughout the manufacturing process, the independent contractors supplied labor and materials labor and materials (time and materials) n. what some builders or repair people contract to provide and be paid for, rather than a fixed price or a percentage of the costs. , held title to the materials and printed goods textile fabrics printed in patterns, especially cotton cloths, or calicoes.
See also: Print until they shipped the goods to the taxpayer, and bore the risk of loss for the materials and printed goods in the event of destruction prior to shipment or in the event of defective production. However, the independent contractors were not permitted to sell the printed goods to anyone other than the taxpayer and did not have a proprietary interest in the cartoon characters created by the taxpayer.
The Tax Court ruled that the taxpayer was subject to the Sec. 263A capitalization requirements because the taxpayer was the owner of its greeting cards until it sold the cards to its customers. The printer never met the requirements of a tax owner. The Tax Court rejected the taxpayer's contention that risk of loss should determine which party owned and produced the greeting cards, finding that identification of the property owner for purposes of Sec. 263A did not turn on which party to an agreement bears the risk of loss but instead required an examination of all the facts and circumstances.
The Ninth Circuit upheld the decision, finding that the relevant requirement necessary to be considered a producer under Sec. 263A was that the taxpayer be considered the owner of the property produced for tax purposes. The court based its determination of ownership on the degree of control that the taxpayer exercised over the manufacturing process from beginning to end. It found that the taxpayer had significant dominion and control over the details of the manufacturing process because it:
* Controlled the manufacturing process, including the quality and quantity of the items manufactured;
* Owned the images reproduced as part of the manufacturing process; and
* Stood to profit most from its sale of the items manufactured (or, alternatively, was exposed to any loss that might occur from the sale of the items manufactured).
Thus, according to according to
1. As stated or indicated by; on the authority of: according to historians.
2. In keeping with: according to instructions.
3. the court, the taxpayer was the owner of the property under Sec. 263A.
Notice 2005-14 also refers to Sec. 936 regarding the determination of what party has the benefits and burdens of ownership. Sec. 936 employs a benefits and burdens test to ascertain whether the possession corporation performs sufficient manufacturing within the possession to meet the "significant business presence" test. Factors that indicate a contract manufacturing relationship can include performing work on inventory without the passage of title, performing production activities under the direct supervision and control of another party, and not undertaking any significant risk in manufacturing the product.
Although not mentioned directly, the factors used in the pre-December 2008 subpart F Subpart F
Special category of foreign-source "unearned" income that is currently taxed by the IRS whether or not it is remitted to the US rules for determining whether a contract manufacturer's manufacturing activities are attributed to a foreign subsidiary that engages its services can also be considered relevant by reference to Sec. 936. These factors similarly refer to the party that controls the process and bears the economic risk of loss as the manufacturer. In both cases, the taxpayer who stands to gain from a successful product and to lose from a product failure is the taxpayer that should be treated as the manufacturer.
Finally, although there is no direct reference given under any Sec. 199 guidance, a taxpayer can also consider tax ownership tests related to the sale or lease of assets. Whether a sale or lease transaction should be respected for federal income tax purposes depends on whether the benefits and burdens of asset ownership have truly passed to the buyer. The facts and circumstances, including the intentions of the parties, are considered in this determination (Grodt & McKay Realty realty n. a short form of "real estate." (See: real estate)
REALTY. An abstract of real, as distinguished from personalty. Realty relates to lands and tenements, rents or other hereditaments. Vide Real Property. , Inc., 77 T.C. 1221 (1981)). These include such factors as:
* Which party bears the risk of loss or damage to the property;
* Which party receives the profits from the operation and sale of the property;
* Who carries insurance or pays property taxes on the property;
* Whether legal title to the property passes;
* Who is responsible for replacing the property; and
* Who has the benefit of any remainder interest in the property.
While no firm guidance exists to specifically address the benefits and burdens of ownership standard for Sec. 199 purposes, the regulations instruct in·struct
v. in·struct·ed, in·struct·ing, in·structs
1. To provide with knowledge, especially in a methodical way. See Synonyms at teach.
2. To give orders to; direct.
v. taxpayers to determine which party in a contract manufacturing arrangement has the benefits and burdens of property ownership "under federal income tax principles" during the qualifying activity. Notice 2005-14 refers taxpayers to the benefits and burdens tests used in Secs. 263A and 936. In a contract manufacturing arrangement, the factors discussed above can give taxpayers some guidelines guidelines,
n.pl a set of standards, criteria, or specifications to be used or followed in the performance of certain tasks. to help determine which party will be deemed to manufacture the property and thereby be entitled to claim the Sec. 199 deduction.
From Brandy brandy [for brandywine, from Du.,=burnt, i.e., distilled, wine], strong alcoholic spirit distilled from wine or from marc, the residue of the wine press. The most noted brandy is cognac, made from white grapes in the Charente district of France. L. Arbuthnot, CPA (Computer Press Association, Landing, NJ) An earlier membership organization founded in 1983 that promoted excellence in computer journalism. Its annual awards honored outstanding examples in print, broadcast and electronic media. The CPA disbanded in 2000. , Dallas, TX