Printer Friendly
The Free Library
14,599,499 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Scare tacticians.


[ILLUSTRATION OMITTED]

AS we all know, the GOP is the party of fear. Republicans scare Americans out of voting their hopes, their dreams, their noblest aspirations--all of the things that, we are told, the Democrats appeal to. According to according to
prep.
1. As stated or indicated by; on the authority of: according to historians.

2. In keeping with: according to instructions.

3.
 a recent Newsweek cover story, which breaks new proctological ground for the depth and breadth of its butt-kissing of the Obama campaign, "the Republican Party has been successfully scaring voters since 1968, when Richard Nixon built a Silent Majority out of lower- and middle-class folks frightened fright·en  
v. fright·ened, fright·en·ing, fright·ens

v.tr.
1. To fill with fear; alarm.

2.
 or disturbed by hippies hippies

1960s “dropouts of American culture” usually identified with very long hair adorned with flowers. [Popular Culture: Misc.]

See : Hair
 and student radicals and blacks rioting in the inner cities." Apparently Rick Perlstein's much-discussed new book, Nixonland, makes a similar argument.

Indeed, it seems few arguments are less controversial. Al Gore Noun 1. Al Gore - Vice President of the United States under Bill Clinton (born in 1948)
Albert Gore Jr., Gore
 rails with vein-popping intensity about how George W. Bush has "played on our fears." If you Google "fear-mongering" and "Democrats," you'll get about 490,000 results, and nearly every hit for the first few pages (after which, pundits trying to confirm their theses are absolved from seeking more data) is about Republican fear-mongering.

There are at least three questions here. Are the historical claims accurate? Do Republicans continue to play on people's fears today? And, if so, what's wrong with that?

Well, history can be in the eye of the beholder. But if we're setting out to chronicle the politicization of fear in the modern era, it might strike some as odd to start with 1968 when, four years earlier, the Democratic party ran its infamous "daisy" ad suggesting that a vote for Au[H.sub.2]O might well render The Children into radioactive cinder cin·der  
n.
1.
a. A burned or partly burned substance, such as coal, that is not reduced to ashes but is incapable of further combustion.

b. A partly charred substance that can burn further but without flame.
.

As for today, sure it's true. The GOP uses fear. Chiefly, it uses fear of terrorists to focus voters on the differences between Republican and Democratic policies. Whether this is irresponsible is, again, in the eye of the beholder, but you probably think the answer hinges to a large extent on how real the terrorist threat is. More on that in a second.

But first, realize that to concede Republicans use fear is not to say they are alone in doing so. John Edwards's "two Americas" shtick shtick also schtick or shtik  
n. Slang
1. A characteristic attribute, talent, or trait that is helpful in securing recognition or attention:
 conjured phantasms of corporate fat cats taking your job and your health care and then kicking down your door and eating the last of your leftover pizza. How Al Gore can emit so much C[O.sub.2] about Bush's fear-mongering without spontaneously bursting into flames of hypocrisy is beyond me, given that his whole post-vice-presidency has been dedicated to scaring the bejeebers out of the whole planet about global warming global warming, the gradual increase of the temperature of the earth's lower atmosphere as a result of the increase in greenhouse gases since the Industrial Revolution. . "Hurricanes! Cyclones! Famine!" These are the wages of Gaia's wrath, saith saith  
v. Archaic
A third person singular present tense of say.
 this supposedly high-road prophet. While we're at it, let the record show that a former boss of his said all sorts of scary stuff about Saddam Hussein--particularly while that boss was being impeached.

Oh, and who was it again who ran those classic fear-mongering "3:00 A.M. in the White House" ads against Barack Obama?

Liberals, Democrats, Clintonites, and environmentalists would respond to all of these counter-examples by saying I'm missing the point. This isn't fear-mongering, they'd say; it's "raising awareness Raising awareness is a common phrase advocacy groups use to justify a particular event, brochure or even the entire organization. Raising awareness refers to alerting the general public that a certain issue exists and should be approached the way the group desires. " and "highlighting the issue." Which is just another way of saying there's a double standard for Republicans. But you don't need me to tell you that. You could just read Newsweek.
COPYRIGHT 2008 National Review, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2008 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:The Week
Author:Goldberg, Jonah
Publication:National Review
Article Type:Viewpoint essay
Geographic Code:1USA
Date:Jun 2, 2008
Words:548
Previous Article:A 6-3 majority of the U.S. Supreme Court upheld an Indiana voter-identification law.(The Week)(Brief article)
Next Article:For decades Burma has been an impoverished autarchy, ruled by the army.(The Week)(Brief article)
Topics:



Related Articles
Better Business Bureau Offers Scholarship Contest.
The Oxford Companion to Jazz.(Review)(Brief Article)
Spending foes ought to listen to Lincoln.(Columns)(Column)
Enhancing argumentative essay writing of fourth-grade students with learning disabilities.
Spectacle and Public Performance in the Late Middle Ages and the Renaissance.(Book review)
EBSCO UNVEILS "CANADIAN POINTS OF VIEW" DATABASE.

Terms of use | Copyright © 2009 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles