Saudi-Iranian Relations 1932-1982.Saudi-Iranian Relations 1932-1982, by Saeed M. Badeeb. London: Centre for Arab and Iranian Studies Iranian Studies or Iranistics is an interdisciplinary field dealing with the study of the Iranian cultural region (or the Iranian "cultural continent"). It incorporates the study of history, literature, art and culture of Iran (Persia). , 1993. 164 pages including appendices, notes and index.
As Saudi scholar Saeed M. Badeeb points out in the introduction to this book, history and geopolitics geopolitics, method of political analysis, popular in Central Europe during the first half of the 20th cent., that emphasized the role played by geography in international relations. have repeatedly shown the importance of Saudi Arabia Saudi Arabia (sä`dē ərā`bēə, sou`–, sô–), officially Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, kingdom (2005 est. pop. and Iran to the West. The economic, military and political importance of these two Gulf countries to U.S. strategic interests has long been accepted by American pundits and foreign-policy experts. Over the past 20 years, however, the Iranian revolution This article is about the 1979 Islamic revolution in Iran. For the political movement in Iran 13 years prior, see White Revolution.
The Iranian Revolution (also known as the Islamic Revolution, and two major conflicts in the Gulf have brought home to the American public the volatility of this oil-rich area and the difficulties that U.S. leaders face in devising an effective policy to establish and sustain a satisfactory degree of stability throughout this region.
With the rise to power after 1958 of a series of anti-Western regimes in Iraq and the 1968 British decision to relinquish its century-old security role in the Gulf, U.S. foreign-policy planners looked first to Iran and Saudi Arabia to preserve Western interests in the Gulf region. However, the Nixon administration's "two pillars" policy of relying on Iran and, secondarily, on Saudi Arabia to maintain regional security against Soviet and radical Arab inroads collapsed in 1979 with the fall of the shah. Iraq's 1990 invasion of Kuwait The Invasion of Kuwait, also known as the Iraq-Kuwait War, was a major conflict between the Republic of Iraq and the State of Kuwait which resulted in the 7 month long Iraqi occupation of Kuwait brought an end to any hopes in Washington and Riyadh that Saddam Hussein might become an acceptable partner in countering revolutionary Iran's efforts to export its anti-U.S, and anti-monarchial ideology across the Gulf. The two-pillars policy therefore was succeeded in the 1990s by the Clinton administration's strategy of "dual containment" of both Iraq and Iran, an approach that has had at best limited success in achieving U.S. goals for peace and security in the Gulf.
Following the election last year of the relatively moderate cleric Mohammed Khatami as Iran's president, there has come a new if still very cautious willingness in Washington and in the Gulf to explore whether Iran can once again play a positive role, together with Saudi Arabia and its smaller partners, in the search for regional stability. Key to the success of any such exploration will be the evolution of Iran's attitude toward the United States and its strategic and economic interests in the Gulf. Another key factor, however, must be further improvement in Saudi-Iranian relations, long strained by the Khomeini regime's antipathy toward the Saudi royal family and its collaboration with the United States in regional affairs. Understanding the respective political interests and priorities of these two Gulf states and their attitudes toward each other is therefore important for American policy makers who wish to comprehend intra-regional political dynamics.
The objective of Mr. Badeeb's slim volume is to examine Saudi-Iranian relations in their historical, political, foreign-policy, religious, economic and military contexts. Despite the title of this book, his historical narrative really begins in 1925, when the Saudi conquest of the Hijaz brought the Islamic holy places in Mecca and Medina under Wahhabi control. The first formal contacts between the countries began when the Iranian government of Reza Pahlavi unsuccessfully sought to mediate between Ibn Saud and King Ali, the sharifian ruler of the Hijaz. After the Saudi conquest, Persian diplomatic delegations visited the holy places at Ibn Saud's invitation to assure themselves that the Wahhabis had not damaged the most sacred sites For the term Most Holy Place as used in the King James Version of the Bible, see .
Many religious traditions have a most sacred site, a physical location which is considered especially holy. in Islam. The signature in 1929 of a Saudi-Iranian Friendship Treaty paved the way to the establishment of formal diplomatic relations.
Over the next five decades, however, the relationship waxed and waned as differences over religious practices, especially during the hajj hajj (häj), the pilgrimage to Mecca, Saudi Arabia, one of the five basic requirements (arkan or "pillars") of Islam. Its annual observance corresponds to the major holy day id al-adha, , and Iranian territorial ambitions led to occasional frictions. In 1943, Saudi execution of an Iranian pilgrim who allegedly desecrated the Kaabah during the pilgrimage led to a break in relations while Reza Shah's 1925 seizure of Arabic-speaking Khuzistan and Iran's claims to Bahrain and to various smaller Gulf islands aroused Saudi concerns about Iranian expansionism ex·pan·sion·ism
A nation's practice or policy of territorial or economic expansion.
ex·pansion·ist adj. & n. . Other differences arose over Iran's refusal to cooperate with the Arab boycott by blocking oil shipments to Israel or to participate in the 1973 Arab oil embargo against the United States. There were also serious disputes over oil-production policy within OPEC OPEC: see Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries.
in full Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries
Multinational organization established in 1960 to coordinate the petroleum production and export policies of its , with the shah seeking for a more gradual escalation of prices and production levels less likely to harm the interests of oil consumers or drive them toward conservation and alternative energy sources.
At the same time, there were important areas of Saudi-Iranian cooperation, especially as both countries sought to halt the spread of revolutionary nationalist and Soviet influence in the region. Proposals in 1957 for a joint military pact came to nought (in part, Badeeb says, because of British fears it would be aimed against their interests in the Gulf) but the two countries separately backed anti-Egyptian royalist roy·al·ist
1. A supporter of government by a monarch.
a. See cavalier.
b. An American loyal to British rule during the American Revolution; a Tory. forces in the Yemen civil war and shared anticommunist intelligence in a French-instigated group code-named the "Safari Club." The shah of Iran supported King Faisal's efforts to promote Islamic solidarity and participated in the establishment of multinational Islamic institutions like the Organization of the Islamic World Congress, the Muslim World League The Muslim World League (MWL, or Rabita from Rabita al-Alam al-Islami) is one of the largest Islamic non-governmental organizations. It was founded in 1962 by Muslim religious figures from 22 countries in Mecca.
The current Secretary General is Dr. , and the Organization of the Islamic Conference. Conclusion of a Median Line median line
1. Anterior median line.
2. Posterior median line. Agreement in the Gulf in 1968 and the shah's acceptance of a U.N.-supervised solution to the Bahrain dispute removed some problems even as the Iranian seizure in 1971 of Abu Musa and the Tunbs and the shah's heavy expenditures on armaments kept alive Saudi suspicions of Iranian intentions in the Gulf. In Badeeb's view, the 1970s were "the decade of mutual understanding" during which "the [two] countries learned to cooperate in certain specified areas without letting their disagreements and rivalry disrupt the wider relationship" (p. 62).
Saudi-Iranian relations deteriorated sharply after 1979, when the Iranian revolution brought to power a regime dominated by Shiite clerics hostile to the West and to Islamic regimes seen as "corrupt." The Iran-Iraq War, in which Saudi Arabia and its smaller Arab Gulf neighbors supported Iraq, put still further strains on the relationship, as did attempts by Iranian pilgrims to mount political demonstrations during the hajj and to smuggle smug·gle
v. smug·gled, smug·gling, smug·gles
1. To import or export without paying lawful customs charges or duties.
2. To bring in or take out illicitly or by stealth. drugs into Saudi Arabia. Unfortunately, for reasons not explained, Mr. Badeeb's survey of Saudi-Iranian relations ends with the year 1982, although his research was not completed until 1991. His conclusion that Saudi-Iranian relations at that point had "stabilized" therefore seems quite premature. Those relations continued to worsen throughout the 1980s, especially during the 1987-88 "tanker war," when Iranian air and naval forces attacked shipping bound for Saudi and Kuwaiti ports in the Gulf and, in Mecca, Iranian pilgrims clashed with Saudi security forces, leaving hundreds killed. In one notable incident, a Saudi interceptor shot down an Iranian fighter aircraft that intruded into
Saudi airspace. Only since late 1997 have the two countries begun to move cautiously toward a new modus vivendi with the participation by Saudi Crown Prince Abdullah in an Islamic summit conference in Tehran, the signing last May of agreements for bilateral cooperation in commercial, cultural and technical matters, and visits by President Khatami and former President Rafsanjani to the kingdom.
The scope of Mr. Badeeb's book is therefore limited primarily to relations during the period of the Iranian monarchy and offers relatively few insights into the current dynamics of this relationship. Another problem with this book is the organization by topics, beginning with "historical background" and going on to chapters on political systems, foreign policy, religion, economics and the military. The author uses this organization to examine and compare developments in the two countries. This analysis tends to be superficial and more often than not reflects the author's pro-Saudi bias rather than a carefully balanced weighing of the strengths and weaknesses of both states and of their political/economic/religious systems. For example, the author cites statements by Saudi leaders that in supporting Iraq against Iran in the early 1980s, their purpose was never to harm Iran or its people; however, he does not try to explain why Iranians might find such assertions disingenuous.
There are also some errors and inconsistencies. Among the notes on page 150, there is the erroneous statement (note 18) that from the mid-eighteenth century, Mecca and Medina had been under Saudi-Wahhabi control, when in fact the initial Wahhabi occupation of the Hijaz lasted only from 1803 (not from 1765, as stated on page 75) to 1814. Note 28 is confusing when it states that a 1988 decision by the Islamic foreign ministers to limit to 10 percent the total population of each Muslim country allowed to make the annual hajj means that only 45,000 of Iran's estimated 45 million population could be pilgrims. While 4.5 million Iranian hajjis would clearly be impracticable, some formula other than 10 percent of total population was used to establish the permissible number.
Despite its limitations, this book does provide some interesting historical tidbits TidBITS is an award-winning electronic newsletter and web site dealing primarily with Apple Computer and Macintosh-related topics. Internet publication
TidBITS has been published weekly since April 16, 1990, which makes it one of the longest running Internet publications. on such subjects as the slave trade slave trade
Capturing, selling, and buying of slaves. Slavery has existed throughout the world from ancient times, and trading in slaves has been equally universal. Slaves were taken from the Slavs and Iranians from antiquity to the 19th century, from the sub-Saharan in the Gulf in the 1920s (p. 103) and early Saudi-Iranian political contacts (p. 47ff). It could therefore serve as a brief introduction to the subject for readers with limited time or background understanding of the Gulf region. While it is helpful in providing a Saudi perspective on the subject, American students of the evolving political-military situation in the Gulf will need to look to other sources for a more up-to-date and thorough analysis of the Saudi-Iranian relationship.
U.S. Foreign Service officer (ret); consul general, Dhahran, 1987-89