Printer Friendly
The Free Library
14,800,756 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Sash v. Zenk.


U.S. District Court

GOOD TIME

Sash v. Zenk, 344 F.Supp.2d 376 (E.D.N.Y. 2004). A federal prisoner petitioned for habeas relief alleging that the federal Bureau of Prisons Noun 1. Federal Bureau of Prisons - the law enforcement agency of the Justice Department that operates a nationwide system of prisons and detention facilities to incarcerate inmates sentenced to imprisonment for federal crimes
BoP
 (BOP) had improperly im·prop·er  
adj.
1. Not suited to circumstances or needs; unsuitable: improper shoes for a hike; improper medical treatment.

2.
 applied a federal statute that governed calculation of good time credits. The district court denied the petition, finding that the calculation of good time credits based on time served, as opposed to the sentence imposed, was a reasonable interpretation of the statute that permitted an inmate INMATE. One who dwells in a part of another's house, the latter dwelling, at the same time, in the said house. Kitch. 45, b; Com. Dig. Justices of the Peace, B 85; 1 B. & Cr. 578; 8 E. C. L. R. 153; 2 Dowl. & Ry. 743; 8 B. & Cr. 71; 15 E. C. L. R. 154; 2 Man. & Ry. 227; 9 B. & Cr.  to earn up to 54 days of good time credit per year. (Federal Bureau of Prisons, New York New York, state, United States
New York, Middle Atlantic state of the United States. It is bordered by Vermont, Massachusetts, Connecticut, and the Atlantic Ocean (E), New Jersey and Pennsylvania (S), Lakes Erie and Ontario and the Canadian province of
)
COPYRIGHT 2005 CRS, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2005, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:HABEAS CORPUS
Publication:Corrections Caselaw Quarterly
Article Type:Brief Article
Geographic Code:1U2NY
Date:Feb 1, 2005
Words:100
Previous Article:Overturf v. Massie.(HABEAS CORPUS)(Brief Article)
Next Article:24. Immunity.
Topics:



Related Articles
U.S. Appeals Court: EX POST FACTO.(Brief Article)
U.S. Appeals Court: PAROLE EX POST FACTO.(Brief Article)
Bell v. True.(cases of habeas corpus)(Brief Article)
Wang v. Ashcroft.(BAIL)(Brief Article)
Singleton v. Norris.(MENTAL PROBLEMS (PRISONER))(Brief Article)
Wever v. Lincoln County, Nebraska.(LIABILITY)(Brief Article)
Jones v. Blanas.(PRETRIAL DETENTION)(Brief Article)
Colton v. Ashcroft.(petition for habeas corpus relief)(Brief Article)
Gamble v. Calbone.(HABEAS CORPUS)(violation of due process of law)(Brief Article)
Habeas corpus.(Brief Article)

Terms of use | Copyright © 2010 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles