Printer Friendly
The Free Library
14,582,672 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Sarbanes-Oxley makes publics go private. (News and Views).


In the recent past, many private companies were in a mad rush to go public to reap the benefits of an IPO (Initial Public Offering) The first time a company offers shares of stock to the public. While not a computer term per se, many founders, employees and insiders of computer companies have found this acronym more exciting than any tech term they ever heard. . Now that the stock market has become more erratic er·rat·ic  
adj.
1. Having no fixed or regular course; wandering.

2. Lacking consistency, regularity, or uniformity: an erratic heartbeat.

3.
, and new stringent regulations for public companies have been established by the recent Sarbanes-Oxley legislation, the trend has reversed itself. The number of public companies going private since last July, when Sarbanes-Oxley was passed, has increased 26% over a similar period prior to the legislation.

"Many of the recent regulatory changes benefit shareholders by making executives and directors more accountable," says Edward Nusbaum, Grant Thornton's CEO (1) (Chief Executive Officer) The highest individual in command of an organization. Typically the president of the company, the CEO reports to the Chairman of the Board. . "While this is great from a shareholder's perspective, companies that are publicly traded may now face additional burdens. Most of these regulatory reform Regulatory Reform concerns improvements to the quality of government regulation.

At the international level, the "OECD Regulatory Reform Programme is aimed at helping governments improve regulatory quality -- that is, reforming regulations that raise unnecessary obstacles to
 provisions are focused squarely square·ly  
adv.
1. Mathematics At right angles: sawed the beam squarely.

2. In a square shape.

3.
 on public companies -- while their private company counterparts do not share these same requirements.

"These recent regulatory developments have increased the cost of being a public company," Nusbaum explains. And "going private could save a company accounting and legal fees associated with Securities and Exchange Commission filings, as well as executive time."

For more on this trend visit www.grantthornton.com.
COPYRIGHT 2003 Society of Management Accountants of Canada
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2003 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:Demers, Julie; Colman, Robert
Publication:CMA Management
Article Type:Brief Article
Geographic Code:1USA
Date:Jun 1, 2003
Words:185
Previous Article:Skills management. (News and Views).(new research chair at the School of Management of Universite du Quebec a Montreal)
Next Article:Markets pummel Canadian pension plans. (News and Views).
Topics:



Related Articles
Going Private: The Best Option.
Sarbanes-Oxley: not fading away.(regulation)(Brief Article)
Changes since Sarbanes-Oxley: Financial Executive/Deloitte & Touche survey.(domestic news)
Weighing the benefits: fewer companies are going public post Sarbanes-Oxley. Why?
Ask FERF (financial executives research foundation) about ... private company compliance with section 404.(resources)
Re-examining Sarbanes-Oxley: deadline for compliance with corporate governance mandates approaches.(Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)
Governance in Brief.
How CFOs can contain rising audit costs: high audit costs could start to force smaller businesses to sacrifice fiscal health for compliance....

Terms of use | Copyright © 2009 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles