Printer Friendly
The Free Library
14,757,569 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Russell v. Richards.


U.S. Appeals Court

HYGIENE

Russell v. Richards, 384 F.3d 444 (7th Cir. 2004). Two inmates brought an action against a sheriff, challenging a jail's policy of instructing new inmates to use delousing shampoo. The district court entered summary judgment for the sheriff and the inmates appealed. The appeals court affirmed, finding that the jail's policy did not violate the inmates' due process right to be free from unwanted medical treatment. The court noted that the jail's policy had a legitimate penological pe·nol·o·gy also poe·nol·o·gy  
n.
The study, theory, and practice of prison management and criminal rehabilitation.



[Latin poena, penalty (from Greek
 interest in preventing inmates and staff from being exposed to lice, and avoiding the costs associated with eradicating a lice infestation Lice Infestation Definition

Lice infestations (pediculoses) are infections of the skin, hair, or genital region caused by lice living directly on the body or in hats or other garments.
. According to according to
prep.
1. As stated or indicated by; on the authority of: according to historians.

2. In keeping with: according to instructions.

3.
 the court, allowing individual inmates to reject delousing shampoo would have placed the sanitation of other prisoners at risk and exposed the jail to potential lawsuits. (Johnson County Johnson County is the name of several counties in the United States:
  • Johnson County, Arkansas
  • Johnson County, Georgia
  • Johnson County, Illinois
  • Johnson County, Indiana
  • Johnson County, Iowa
  • Johnson County, Kansas
  • Johnson County, Kentucky
 Jail, Indiana)
COPYRIGHT 2004 CRS, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2004, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:HYGIENE-PRISONER PERSONAL
Publication:Corrections Caselaw Quarterly
Article Type:Brief Article
Geographic Code:1U3IN
Date:Nov 1, 2004
Words:136
Previous Article:Gates v. Cook.(HYGIENE-PRISONER PERSONAL)(Brief Article)
Next Article:Davis v. Hall.(due process violations)(Brief Article)
Topics:



Related Articles
Liability.
Hewes v. Magnusson.(FAILURE TO PROTECT)(case regarding prisoner abuse)
Board v. Farnham.(HYGIENE-PRISONER PERSONAL)(Brief Article)
Owens v. Sebelius.(HYGIENE-PRISONER PERSONAL)(Brief Article)
Boyd v. Anderson.(prisoners allegs violation of federally-protected rights)
Boyd v. Anderson.(Brief Article)
Hygiene-prisoner personal.(Brief Article)
Atkins v. County of Orange.(HYGIENE-PRISONER PERSONAL)(Brief Article)
Calhoun v. Thomas.(HYGIENE-PRISONER PERSONAL)(Brief Article)
Davidson v. Murray.(HYGIENE-PRISONER PERSONAL)(Brief Article)

Terms of use | Copyright © 2009 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles