Printer Friendly
The Free Library
14,694,313 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Royal v. Kautzky.


U.S. Appeals Court

PUNITIVE DAMAGES Monetary compensation awarded to an injured party that goes beyond that which is necessary to compensate the individual for losses and that is intended to punish the wrongdoer.  

NOMINAL DAMAGES Minimal money damages awarded to an individual in an action where the person has not suffered any substantial injury or loss for which he or she must be compensated.  

PLRA PLRA Partido Liberal Radical Autentico (Paraguay)
PLRA Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1995
 -- Prison Litigation An action brought in court to enforce a particular right. The act or process of bringing a lawsuit in and of itself; a judicial contest; any dispute.

When a person begins a civil lawsuit, the person enters into a process called litigation.
 Reform Act

Royal v. Kautzky, 375 F.3d 720 (8th Cir. 2004). A prisoner filed a civil rights action against a prison employee, alleging retaliation against his First Amendment rights and access to the courts. Finding that the prisoner did not sustain a physical injury, the district court denied mental or emotional damages, awarding only nominal damages, and further denied an award of punitive damages. The prisoner appealed. The appeals court affirmed. The appeals court held that Prison Litigation Reform Act's (PLRA) limitation on damages to those who sustain a physical injury applied to First Amendment violations. The court found that the district court did not abuse its discretion by not awarding punitive damages. (Iowa Medical Classification Center)
COPYRIGHT 2004 CRS, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2004, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:damages, civil rights action
Publication:Corrections Caselaw Quarterly
Article Type:Brief Article
Geographic Code:1U4IA
Date:Nov 1, 2004
Words:129
Previous Article:Riley v. Kurtz.(LIABILITY)(Brief Article)
Next Article:Shaw v. Coosa County Com'n.(LIABILITY)(Brief Article)
Topics:



Related Articles
U.S. district court eleventh amendment official capacity. (Liability).(Brief Article)
Religion.
Johnson v. Breeden.(ATTORNEY FEES)(Brief Article)
Johnson v. Breeden.(FAILURE TO PROTECT)(case regarding lawyers fees)(Brief Article)
Johnson v. Breeden.(LIABILITY)(Brief Article)
Williams v. Kaufman County.(false improsonment and violation of constitutional rights)(Brief Article)
Hock v. Thipedeau.(LIABILITY)(Brief Article)
White v. Kautzky.(prisoner alleges correction officials of violating his access to courts rights)(Brief Article)
Thomas v. Barker.(Thomas v. Barker, 371 F.Supp.2d 636)(Brief Article)
Hubbs v. Alamao.(Hubbs v. Alamao, 360 F.Supp.2d 1073)(Brief Article)

Terms of use | Copyright © 2009 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles