Printer Friendly
The Free Library
14,380,416 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Rolling average cost inventory method.


In Jan. 19, 2006 continents, the AICPA AICPA

See American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA).
 proposed that the IRS An abbreviation for the Internal Revenue Service, a federal agency charged with the responsibility of administering and enforcing internal revenue laws.  and Treasury should allow the use of the rolling average cost method in valuing inventories when this method approximates actual cost. Revenue rulings issued in 1971 and 1977 held that average cost determinations could not consider costs incurred before the beginning of the year (i.e., roiling average costs). Because inventory costing systems at that time were less sophisticated, the averaging process took place infrequently; in periods of rapidly increasing prices, an averaged cost for ending inventory items could be lower than any cost incurred during the current year. It was for this reason that the IILS IILS International Institute for Labour Studies (International Labour Organization)
IILS Image Interpretation Light Station
 rejected the rolling average cost method.

Because today's accounting systems are much more sophisticated, "the weight accorded to the costs incurred in prior years is so slight that the ending inventory cost more nearly approximates first in, first out (FIFO (First In First Out) A storage method that retrieves the item stored for the longest time. Contrast with LIFO. See traffic engineering methods.

FIFO - first-in first-out
)." In addition, because there is an increasing number of inventory costing systems that use a rolling average cost, a continuation of the ban puts taxpayers at risk. Noting two recent revenue procedures that allowed a replacement cost method that approximated actual cost, the AICPA urged the IRS and Treasury to "allow the use of rolling average cost whenever it approximates actual cost consistent" with these rulings.

Lesli S. Laffie, J.D., LL.M LL.M Legum Magister (Master of Laws) .
COPYRIGHT 2006 American Institute of CPA's
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2006, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:AICPA ACTIVITIES
Author:Laffie, Lesli S.
Publication:The Tax Adviser
Date:Apr 1, 2006
Words:221
Previous Article:Environmental remediation denied sec. 1341 relief again.
Next Article:Disregarded entities.(AICPA ACTIVITIES)



Related Articles
Compliance with the uniform capitalization rules: a study involving smaller manufacturers and resellers.
Resolved: start-up costs are not assets.
Change of accounting method for small taxpayers with inventory under rev. proc. 2000-22.
Congress Includes AICPA GST Tax Proposal in Estate Tax Bill; Other Institute-Backed Changes Poised for Action.(Brief Article)
The cash method for small businesses.
"America counts on CPAs"--new tagline for the profession.(news update)(Certified public accountants)(Brief Article)
TEC initiatives.(Tax Executive Committee)
Kobe Steel Reports Consolidated Financial Results for the First Half of Fiscal 2006.
No significant problems arise during 2006 tax filing season, AICPA tells Congress.
Tax-strategy patents and the tax gap.(DC Currents)

Terms of use | Copyright © 2009 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles