Printer Friendly
The Free Library
14,582,377 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

Rodriguez v. Ames.


U.S. District Court

ATTORNEY-CLIENT COMMUNICATION

Rodriguez v. Ames, 224 F.Supp.2d 555 (W.D.N.Y. 2002). A pro se state prisoner one in confinement, or under arrest, for a political offense.

See also: State
 brought a suit against state corrections officials and employees, alleging violations of [section] 1983. The district court granted partial summary judgment for the defendants. The court held that a prison directive that prohibited pro·hib·it  
tr.v. pro·hib·it·ed, pro·hib·it·ing, pro·hib·its
1. To forbid by authority: Smoking is prohibited in most theaters. See Synonyms at forbid.

2.
 prisoners from soliciting did not violate the prisoner's First Amendment rights because there was a rational connection between the directive and a legitimate governmental interest in prison security, and where there were no alternative avenues that would allow the prisoner to exercise his rights. The court found that the prisoner's Sixth Amendment right to privacy while speaking to an attorney was not violated vi·o·late  
tr.v. vi·o·lat·ed, vi·o·lat·ing, vi·o·lates
1. To break or disregard (a law or promise, for example).

2. To assault (a person) sexually.

3.
 by the presence of a corrections counselor for the duration of the call. The prisoner was attempting to secure legal representation for a potential [section] 1983 action and the court found that the prisoner failed to show any harm that resulted from the presence of the counselor. (Auburn Correctional Facility Auburn Correctional Facility is a state prison located on State Street in Auburn, New York. It is classified as a maximum security facility.

Constructed in 1816 as Auburn Prison
, New York New York, state, United States
New York, Middle Atlantic state of the United States. It is bordered by Vermont, Massachusetts, Connecticut, and the Atlantic Ocean (E), New Jersey and Pennsylvania (S), Lakes Erie and Ontario and the Canadian province of
)
COPYRIGHT 2003 CRS, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2003, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:PRIVACY
Publication:Corrections Caselaw Quarterly
Article Type:Brief Article
Geographic Code:1U2NY
Date:May 1, 2003
Words:172
Previous Article:Wood v. Hancock County.(violation of civil rights, strip searches)(Brief Article)
Next Article:Calhoun v. Detella.(PRIVACY)(Brief Article)
Topics:



Related Articles
Was Ames a mortal blow?(CIA spy Aldrich Ames)(Editorial)
New study analyzes AIDS cases, identifies trends.
Correction.(Correction Notice)
BRIEFLY : CLIPPERS IN NO RUSH TO HIRE A NEW COACH.(SPORTS)
Rodriguez v. Ames.(violation of constitutional right to privacy)(Brief Article)
Rodriguez v. Ames.(violation of right of privacy)(Brief Article)
Rodriguez v. Ames.(ACCESS TO COURT)(Brief Article)
Rodriguez v. Ames.(soliciting)(Brief Article)
Hubbs v. Alamao.(Hubbs v. Alamao, 360 F.Supp.2d 1073)(Brief Article)
In the affirmative.(FROM THE READERS)(Letter to the editor)

Terms of use | Copyright © 2009 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles